From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev,
David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: Optimize __READ_ONCE() with CONFIG_LTO=y
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 15:16:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260216142436.2207937-3-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260216142436.2207937-2-elver@google.com>
Rework arm64 LTO __READ_ONCE() to improve code generation as follows:
1. Replace _Generic-based __unqual_scalar_typeof() with more complete
__rwonce_typeof_unqual(). This strips qualifiers from all types, not
just integer types, which is required to be able to assign (must be
non-const) to __u.__val in the non-atomic case (required for #2).
One subtle point here is that non-integer types of __val could be const
or volatile within the union with the old __unqual_scalar_typeof(), if
the passed variable is const or volatile. This would then result in a
forced load from the stack if __u.__val is volatile; in the case of
const, it does look odd if the underlying storage changes, but the
compiler is told said member is "const" -- it smells like UB.
2. Eliminate the atomic flag and ternary conditional expression. Move
the fallback volatile load into the default case of the switch,
ensuring __u is unconditionally initialized across all paths.
The statement expression now unconditionally returns __u.__val.
This refactoring appears to help the compiler improve (or fix) code
generation.
With a defconfig + LTO + debug options builds, we observe different
codegen for the following functions:
btrfs_reclaim_sweep (708 -> 1032 bytes)
btrfs_sinfo_bg_reclaim_threshold_store (200 -> 204 bytes)
check_mem_access (3652 -> 3692 bytes) [inlined bpf_map_is_rdonly]
console_flush_all (1268 -> 1264 bytes)
console_lock_spinning_disable_and_check (180 -> 176 bytes)
igb_add_filter (640 -> 636 bytes)
igb_config_tx_modes (2404 -> 2400 bytes)
kvm_vcpu_on_spin (480 -> 476 bytes)
map_freeze (376 -> 380 bytes)
netlink_bind (1664 -> 1656 bytes)
nmi_cpu_backtrace (404 -> 400 bytes)
set_rps_cpu (516 -> 520 bytes)
swap_cluster_readahead (944 -> 932 bytes)
tcp_accecn_third_ack (328 -> 336 bytes)
tcp_create_openreq_child (1764 -> 1772 bytes)
tcp_data_queue (5784 -> 5892 bytes)
tcp_ecn_rcv_synack (620 -> 628 bytes)
xen_manage_runstate_time (944 -> 896 bytes)
xen_steal_clock (340 -> 296 bytes)
Increase of some functions are due to more aggressive inlining due to
better codegen (in this build, e.g. bpf_map_is_rdonly is no longer
present due to being inlined completely).
NOTE: The return-value-of-function-drops-qualifiers hack was first
suggested by Al Viro in [1], which notes some of its limitations which
make it unsuitable for a general __unqual_scalar_typeof() replacement.
Notably, array types are not supported, and GCC 8.1-8.3 still fail. Why
should we use it here? READ_ONCE() does not support reading whole
arrays, and the GCC version problem only affects 3 minor releases of a
very ancient still-supported GCC version; not only that, this arm64
READ_ONCE() version is currently only activated by LTO builds, which
to-date are *only supported by Clang*!
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260111182010.GH3634291@ZenIV/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
v4:
* Use the return-value-of-function-drops-qualifiers hack to paint the
bikeshed.
v3:
* Comment.
v2:
* Add __rwonce_typeof_unqual() as fallback for old compilers.
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h | 18 ++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h
index fc0fb42b0b64..9fd24cef3376 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h
@@ -19,6 +19,17 @@
"ldapr" #sfx "\t" #regs, \
ARM64_HAS_LDAPR)
+/*
+ * Replace this with typeof_unqual() when minimum compiler versions are
+ * increased to GCC 14 and Clang 19. For the time being, we need this
+ * workaround, which relies on function return values dropping qualifiers.
+ */
+#define __rwonce_typeof_unqual(x) typeof(({ \
+ __diag_push() \
+ __diag_ignore_all("-Wignored-qualifiers", "") \
+ ((typeof(x)(*)(void))0)(); \
+ __diag_pop() }))
+
/*
* When building with LTO, there is an increased risk of the compiler
* converting an address dependency headed by a READ_ONCE() invocation
@@ -32,8 +43,7 @@
#define __READ_ONCE(x) \
({ \
typeof(&(x)) __x = &(x); \
- int atomic = 1; \
- union { __unqual_scalar_typeof(*__x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u; \
+ union { __rwonce_typeof_unqual(*__x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u; \
switch (sizeof(x)) { \
case 1: \
asm volatile(__LOAD_RCPC(b, %w0, %1) \
@@ -56,9 +66,9 @@
: "Q" (*__x) : "memory"); \
break; \
default: \
- atomic = 0; \
+ __u.__val = *(volatile typeof(*__x) *)__x; \
} \
- atomic ? (typeof(*__x))__u.__val : (*(volatile typeof(*__x) *)__x);\
+ __u.__val; \
})
#endif /* !BUILD_VDSO */
--
2.53.0.335.g19a08e0c02-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-16 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-16 14:16 [PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: Fixes for __READ_ONCE() with CONFIG_LTO=y Marco Elver
2026-02-16 14:16 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2026-02-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64, compiler-context-analysis: Permit alias analysis through " Marco Elver
2026-02-16 18:00 ` David Laight
2026-02-16 18:40 ` Marco Elver
2026-02-27 3:16 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: Fixes for " Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260216142436.2207937-3-elver@google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.