From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Junrui Luo <moonafterrain@outlook.com>
Cc: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yuhao Jiang <danisjiang@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] dpaa2-switch: validate num_ifs to prevent out-of-bounds write
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 14:14:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260219141407.7fd697c0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SYBPR01MB788110DFE66BA1A5CE7E594FAF6DA@SYBPR01MB7881.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, 17 Feb 2026 22:42:40 +0800 Junrui Luo wrote:
> The driver obtains sw_attr.num_ifs from firmware via dpsw_get_attributes()
> but never validates it against DPSW_MAX_IF (64). This value controls
> iteration in dpaa2_switch_fdb_get_flood_cfg(), which writes port indices
> into the fixed-size cfg->if_id[DPSW_MAX_IF] array. When firmware reports
> num_ifs >= 64, the loop can write past the array bounds.
>
> Add a bound check for num_ifs in dpaa2_switch_init().
>
> Reported-by: Yuhao Jiang <danisjiang@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Junrui Luo <moonafterrain@outlook.com>
Please remove the self-referential reported-by tags. FWIW:
https://github.com/google/security-research/pull/334
> Fixes: f054e3e217e4 ("dpaa2-switch: refactor the egress flooding domain setup")
This commit looks like refactoring.
Please dig a bit deeper to find the real commit in which the bug was
added.
> Signed-off-by: Junrui Luo <moonafterrain@outlook.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-switch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-switch.c
> index 66240c340492..78e21b46a5ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-switch.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-switch.c
> @@ -3034,6 +3034,13 @@ static int dpaa2_switch_init(struct fsl_mc_device *sw_dev)
> goto err_close;
> }
>
> + if (ethsw->sw_attr.num_ifs >= DPSW_MAX_IF) {
Unclear to me from a quick look at the code and the commit message why
we reject num_ifs == DPSW_MAX_IF. I see there are some references to a
control interface in egress flooding, is that why?
Please explain clearly.
--
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-19 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-17 14:42 [PATCH net] dpaa2-switch: validate num_ifs to prevent out-of-bounds write Junrui Luo
2026-02-19 22:14 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-02-23 8:20 Junrui Luo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260219141407.7fd697c0@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=danisjiang@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ioana.ciornei@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=moonafterrain@outlook.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.