From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>,
Peilin Ye <yepeilin@google.com>,
Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@fau.de>,
Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/6] selftests/bpf: Add __cpu_feature annotation for CPU-feature-gated tests
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 22:29:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260219142933.13904-6-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260219142933.13904-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Add a new __cpu_feature("...") test annotation and parse it in
selftests/bpf test_loader.
Behavior:
- Annotation value is matched against CPU feature tokens from
/proc/cpuinfo (case-insensitive).
- Multiple __cpu_feature annotations can be specified for one test; all
required features must be present.
- If any required feature is missing, the test is skipped.
Limitation:
- __cpu_feature is evaluated per test function and is not scoped per
__arch_* block. A single test that combines multiple architectures
cannot express different per-arch feature requirements.
This lets JIT/disassembly-sensitive tests declare explicit CPU feature
requirements and avoid false failures on unsupported systems.
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h | 7 +
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c | 150 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 157 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h
index c9bfbe1bafc1..75e66373a64d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h
@@ -126,6 +126,12 @@
* Several __arch_* annotations could be specified at once.
* When test case is not run on current arch it is marked as skipped.
* __caps_unpriv Specify the capabilities that should be set when running the test.
+ * __cpu_feature Specify required CPU feature for test execution.
+ * Multiple __cpu_feature annotations could be specified.
+ * Value must match a CPU feature token exposed by
+ * /proc/cpuinfo (case-insensitive).
+ * Can't be used together with multiple __arch_* tags.
+ * If any required feature is not present, test case is skipped.
*
* __linear_size Specify the size of the linear area of non-linear skbs, or
* 0 for linear skbs.
@@ -156,6 +162,7 @@
#define __arch_riscv64 __arch("RISCV64")
#define __arch_s390x __arch("s390x")
#define __caps_unpriv(caps) __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_caps_unpriv=" EXPAND_QUOTE(caps))))
+#define __cpu_feature(feat) __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_cpu_feature=" feat)))
#define __load_if_JITed() __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:load_mode=jited")))
#define __load_if_no_JITed() __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:load_mode=no_jited")))
#define __stderr(msg) __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_stderr=" XSTR(__COUNTER__) "=" msg)))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
index 338c035c3688..3729d1572589 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <test_progs.h>
#include <bpf/btf.h>
+#include <ctype.h>
#include "autoconf_helper.h"
#include "disasm_helpers.h"
@@ -44,6 +45,7 @@
#define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_STDOUT_PFX "comment:test_expect_stdout="
#define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_STDOUT_PFX_UNPRIV "comment:test_expect_stdout_unpriv="
#define TEST_TAG_LINEAR_SIZE "comment:test_linear_size="
+#define TEST_TAG_CPU_FEATURE_PFX "comment:test_cpu_feature="
/* Warning: duplicated in bpf_misc.h */
#define POINTER_VALUE 0xbadcafe
@@ -67,6 +69,11 @@ enum load_mode {
NO_JITED = 1 << 1,
};
+struct cpu_feature_set {
+ char **names;
+ size_t cnt;
+};
+
struct test_subspec {
char *name;
bool expect_failure;
@@ -93,6 +100,7 @@ struct test_spec {
int linear_sz;
bool auxiliary;
bool valid;
+ struct cpu_feature_set cpu_features;
};
static int tester_init(struct test_loader *tester)
@@ -145,6 +153,16 @@ static void free_test_spec(struct test_spec *spec)
free(spec->unpriv.name);
spec->priv.name = NULL;
spec->unpriv.name = NULL;
+
+ if (spec->cpu_features.names) {
+ size_t i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < spec->cpu_features.cnt; i++)
+ free(spec->cpu_features.names[i]);
+ free(spec->cpu_features.names);
+ spec->cpu_features.names = NULL;
+ spec->cpu_features.cnt = 0;
+ }
}
/* Compiles regular expression matching pattern.
@@ -394,6 +412,122 @@ static int get_current_arch(void)
return ARCH_UNKNOWN;
}
+static int cpu_feature_set_add(struct cpu_feature_set *set, const char *name)
+{
+ char **tmp, *norm;
+ size_t i, len;
+
+ if (!name || !name[0]) {
+ PRINT_FAIL("bad cpu feature spec: empty string");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ len = strlen(name);
+ norm = malloc(len + 1);
+ if (!norm)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
+ if (isspace(name[i])) {
+ free(norm);
+ PRINT_FAIL("bad cpu feature spec: whitespace is not allowed in '%s'", name);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ norm[i] = tolower((unsigned char)name[i]);
+ }
+ norm[len] = '\0';
+
+ for (i = 0; i < set->cnt; i++) {
+ if (strcmp(set->names[i], norm) == 0) {
+ free(norm);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ }
+
+ tmp = realloc(set->names, (set->cnt + 1) * sizeof(*set->names));
+ if (!tmp) {
+ free(norm);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ set->names = tmp;
+ set->names[set->cnt++] = norm;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static bool cpu_feature_set_has(const struct cpu_feature_set *set, const char *name)
+{
+ size_t i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < set->cnt; i++) {
+ if (strcmp(set->names[i], name) == 0)
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+static bool cpu_feature_set_includes(const struct cpu_feature_set *have,
+ const struct cpu_feature_set *need)
+{
+ size_t i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < need->cnt; i++) {
+ if (!cpu_feature_set_has(have, need->names[i]))
+ return false;
+ }
+ return true;
+}
+
+static const struct cpu_feature_set *get_current_cpu_features(void)
+{
+ static struct cpu_feature_set set;
+ static bool initialized;
+ char *line = NULL;
+ size_t len = 0;
+ FILE *fp;
+ int err;
+
+ if (initialized)
+ return &set;
+
+ initialized = true;
+ fp = fopen("/proc/cpuinfo", "r");
+ if (!fp)
+ return &set;
+
+ while (getline(&line, &len, fp) != -1) {
+ char *p = line, *colon, *tok;
+
+ while (*p && isspace(*p))
+ p++;
+ if (!str_has_pfx(p, "flags") &&
+ !str_has_pfx(p, "Features") &&
+ !str_has_pfx(p, "features"))
+ continue;
+
+ colon = strchr(p, ':');
+ if (!colon)
+ continue;
+
+ for (tok = strtok(colon + 1, " \t\n"); tok; tok = strtok(NULL, " \t\n")) {
+ err = cpu_feature_set_add(&set, tok);
+ if (err) {
+ PRINT_FAIL("failed to parse cpu feature from '/proc/cpuinfo': '%s'",
+ tok);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ free(line);
+ fclose(fp);
+ return &set;
+}
+
+static int parse_cpu_feature(const char *name, struct cpu_feature_set *set)
+{
+ return cpu_feature_set_add(set, name);
+}
+
/* Uses btf_decl_tag attributes to describe the expected test
* behavior, see bpf_misc.h for detailed description of each attribute
* and attribute combinations.
@@ -650,9 +784,20 @@ static int parse_test_spec(struct test_loader *tester,
err = -EINVAL;
goto cleanup;
}
+ } else if (str_has_pfx(s, TEST_TAG_CPU_FEATURE_PFX)) {
+ val = s + sizeof(TEST_TAG_CPU_FEATURE_PFX) - 1;
+ err = parse_cpu_feature(val, &spec->cpu_features);
+ if (err)
+ goto cleanup;
}
}
+ if (spec->cpu_features.cnt && __builtin_popcount(arch_mask) != 1) {
+ PRINT_FAIL("__cpu_feature requires exactly one __arch_* tag");
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+
spec->arch_mask = arch_mask ?: -1;
spec->load_mask = load_mask ?: (JITED | NO_JITED);
@@ -1161,6 +1306,11 @@ void run_subtest(struct test_loader *tester,
return;
}
+ if (!cpu_feature_set_includes(get_current_cpu_features(), &spec->cpu_features)) {
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+ }
+
if (unpriv) {
if (!can_execute_unpriv(tester, spec)) {
test__skip();
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-19 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-19 14:29 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/6] bpf: Introduce 64-bit bitops kfuncs Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 14:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/6] " Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 17:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-20 15:34 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 14:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/6] bpf, x86: Add 64-bit bitops kfuncs support for x86_64 Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 17:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-20 15:54 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-20 17:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-21 12:45 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-21 16:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-23 16:35 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 22:05 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-20 14:12 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-20 11:59 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-19 14:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/6] bpf, arm64: Add 64-bit bitops kfuncs support Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 15:10 ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-02-19 15:20 ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-02-19 15:25 ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-02-19 15:36 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 14:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/6] selftests/bpf: Add tests for 64-bit bitops kfuncs Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 14:29 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-02-19 14:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add JIT disassembly " Leon Hwang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-02-20 18:57 [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/6] bpf: Introduce " kernel test robot
2026-02-21 9:58 ` Dan Carpenter
2026-02-21 12:50 ` Leon Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260219142933.13904-6-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luis.gerhorst@fau.de \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vmalik@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yepeilin@google.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.