From: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>,
Abhishek Dubey <adubey@linux.ibm.com>,
Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] powerpc64/bpf: do not increment tailcall count when prog is NULL
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:09:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260220063933.196141-2-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260220063933.196141-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Do not increment tailcall count, if tailcall did not succeed due to
missing BPF program.
Fixes: ce0761419fae ("powerpc/bpf: Implement support for tail calls")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
---
* No changes since v1.
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index b1a3945ccc9f..44ce8a8783f9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -522,9 +522,30 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o
/*
* tail_call_info++; <- Actual value of tcc here
+ * Writeback this updated value only if tailcall succeeds.
*/
EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), 1));
+ /* prog = array->ptrs[index]; */
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2), b2p_index, 8));
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2), bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2), b2p_bpf_array));
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2), bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2),
+ offsetof(struct bpf_array, ptrs)));
+
+ /*
+ * if (prog == NULL)
+ * goto out;
+ */
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLDI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2), 0));
+ PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_EQ, out);
+
+ /* goto *(prog->bpf_func + prologue_size); */
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2), bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2),
+ offsetof(struct bpf_prog, bpf_func)));
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2), bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2),
+ FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE + bpf_tailcall_prologue_size));
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2)));
+
/*
* Before writing updated tail_call_info, distinguish if current frame
* is storing a reference to tail_call_info or actual tcc value in
@@ -539,24 +560,6 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o
/* Writeback updated value to tail_call_info */
EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2), 0));
- /* prog = array->ptrs[index]; */
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), b2p_index, 8));
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), b2p_bpf_array));
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), offsetof(struct bpf_array, ptrs)));
-
- /*
- * if (prog == NULL)
- * goto out;
- */
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLDI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), 0));
- PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_EQ, out);
-
- /* goto *(prog->bpf_func + prologue_size); */
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), offsetof(struct bpf_prog, bpf_func)));
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1),
- FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE + bpf_tailcall_prologue_size));
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1)));
-
/* tear down stack, restore NVRs, ... */
bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(image, ctx);
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-20 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-20 6:39 [PATCH v2 0/5] powerpc64/bpf: various fixes Hari Bathini
2026-02-20 6:39 ` Hari Bathini [this message]
2026-02-21 3:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] powerpc64/bpf: do not increment tailcall count when prog is NULL Venkat Rao Bagalkote
2026-02-20 6:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] powerpc64/bpf: fix the address returned by bpf_get_func_ip Hari Bathini
2026-02-21 3:41 ` Venkat Rao Bagalkote
2026-02-22 12:21 ` adubey
2026-02-20 6:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] powerpc64/bpf: use consistent tailcall offset in trampoline Hari Bathini
2026-02-22 13:07 ` adubey
2026-03-03 13:43 ` Hari Bathini
2026-02-20 6:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] powerpc64/bpf: remove BPF redzone protection in trampoline stack Hari Bathini
2026-02-21 3:43 ` Venkat Rao Bagalkote
2026-02-20 6:39 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] powerpc64/bpf: fix handling of BPF stack in exception callback Hari Bathini
2026-02-23 9:03 ` adubey
2026-03-03 13:46 ` Hari Bathini
2026-02-24 12:28 ` adubey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260220063933.196141-2-hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--to=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=adubey@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=skb99@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.