All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCHv4 bpf-next 4/5] selftests/bpf: Add test for checking correct nop of optimized usdt
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2026 11:42:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260220104220.634154-5-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260220104220.634154-1-jolsa@kernel.org>

Adding test that attaches bpf program on usdt probe in 2 scenarios;

- attach program on top of usdt_1, which is single nop instruction,
  so the probe stays on nop instruction and is not optimized.

- attach program on top of usdt_2 which is probe defined on top
  of nop,nop5 combo, so the probe is placed on top of nop5 and
  is optimized.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore        |  2 +
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile          |  3 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/usdt.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_usdt.c | 12 +++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/usdt_1.c          | 18 ++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/usdt_2.c          | 16 ++++
 6 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/usdt_1.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/usdt_2.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore
index a3ea98211ea6..bfdc5518ecc8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore
@@ -47,3 +47,5 @@ verification_cert.h
 *.BTF
 *.BTF_ids
 *.BTF.base
+usdt_1
+usdt_2
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index 6776158f1f3e..23857d17fc5b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@ -749,7 +749,8 @@ TRUNNER_EXTRA_SOURCES := test_progs.c		\
 			 $(VERIFY_SIG_HDR)		\
 			 flow_dissector_load.h	\
 			 ip_check_defrag_frags.h	\
-			 bpftool_helpers.c
+			 bpftool_helpers.c	\
+			 usdt_1.c usdt_2.c
 TRUNNER_LIB_SOURCES := find_bit.c
 TRUNNER_EXTRA_FILES := $(OUTPUT)/urandom_read				\
 		       $(OUTPUT)/liburandom_read.so			\
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/usdt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/usdt.c
index f4be5269fa90..69759b27794d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/usdt.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/usdt.c
@@ -247,6 +247,96 @@ static void subtest_basic_usdt(bool optimized)
 #undef TRIGGER
 }
 
+#ifdef __x86_64__
+extern void usdt_1(void);
+extern void usdt_2(void);
+
+static unsigned char nop1[1] = { 0x90 };
+static unsigned char nop1_nop5_combo[6] = { 0x90, 0x0f, 0x1f, 0x44, 0x00, 0x00 };
+
+static void *find_instr(void *fn, unsigned char *instr, size_t cnt)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
+		if (!memcmp(instr, fn + i, cnt))
+			return fn + i;
+	}
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static void subtest_optimized_attach(void)
+{
+	struct test_usdt *skel;
+	__u8 *addr_1, *addr_2;
+
+	/* usdt_1 USDT probe has single nop instruction */
+	addr_1 = find_instr(usdt_1, nop1_nop5_combo, 6);
+	if (!ASSERT_NULL(addr_1, "usdt_1_find_nop1_nop5_combo"))
+		return;
+
+	addr_1 = find_instr(usdt_1, nop1, 1);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(addr_1, "usdt_1_find_nop1"))
+		return;
+
+	/* usdt_2 USDT probe has nop,nop5 instructions combo */
+	addr_2 = find_instr(usdt_2, nop1_nop5_combo, 6);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(addr_2, "usdt_2_find_nop1_nop5_combo"))
+		return;
+
+	skel = test_usdt__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_usdt__open_and_load"))
+		return;
+
+	skel->bss->expected_ip = (unsigned long) addr_1;
+
+	/*
+	 * Attach program on top of usdt_1 which is single nop probe,
+	 * so the probe won't get optimized.
+	 */
+	skel->links.usdt_executed = bpf_program__attach_usdt(skel->progs.usdt_executed,
+						     0 /*self*/, "/proc/self/exe",
+						     "optimized_attach", "usdt_1", NULL);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.usdt_executed, "bpf_program__attach_usdt"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	usdt_1();
+	usdt_1();
+
+	/* int3 is on addr_1 address */
+	ASSERT_EQ(*addr_1, 0xcc, "int3");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->executed, 2, "executed");
+
+	bpf_link__destroy(skel->links.usdt_executed);
+
+	/* we expect the nop5 ip */
+	skel->bss->expected_ip = (unsigned long) addr_2 + 1;
+
+	/*
+	 * Attach program on top of usdt_2 which is probe defined on top
+	 * of nop1,nop5 combo, so the probe gets optimized on top of nop5.
+	 */
+	skel->links.usdt_executed = bpf_program__attach_usdt(skel->progs.usdt_executed,
+						     0 /*self*/, "/proc/self/exe",
+						     "optimized_attach", "usdt_2", NULL);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.usdt_executed, "bpf_program__attach_usdt"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	usdt_2();
+	usdt_2();
+
+	/* nop stays on addr_2 address */
+	ASSERT_EQ(*addr_2, 0x90, "nop");
+
+	/* call is on addr_2 + 1 address */
+	ASSERT_EQ(*(addr_2 + 1), 0xe8, "call");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->executed, 4, "executed");
+
+cleanup:
+	test_usdt__destroy(skel);
+}
+#endif
+
 unsigned short test_usdt_100_semaphore SEC(".probes");
 unsigned short test_usdt_300_semaphore SEC(".probes");
 unsigned short test_usdt_400_semaphore SEC(".probes");
@@ -516,6 +606,8 @@ void test_usdt(void)
 #ifdef __x86_64__
 	if (test__start_subtest("basic_optimized"))
 		subtest_basic_usdt(true);
+	if (test__start_subtest("optimized_attach"))
+		subtest_optimized_attach();
 #endif
 	if (test__start_subtest("multispec"))
 		subtest_multispec_usdt();
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_usdt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_usdt.c
index a78c87537b07..f00cb52874e0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_usdt.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_usdt.c
@@ -138,4 +138,16 @@ int usdt_sib(struct pt_regs *ctx)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#ifdef __TARGET_ARCH_x86
+int executed;
+unsigned long expected_ip;
+
+SEC("usdt")
+int usdt_executed(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+	if (expected_ip == ctx->ip)
+		executed++;
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/usdt_1.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/usdt_1.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4f06e8bcf58b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/usdt_1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#if defined(__x86_64__)
+
+/*
+ * Include usdt.h with defined USDT_NOP macro to use single
+ * nop instruction.
+ */
+#define USDT_NOP .byte 0x90
+#include "usdt.h"
+
+__attribute__((aligned(16)))
+void usdt_1(void)
+{
+	USDT(optimized_attach, usdt_1);
+}
+
+#endif
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/usdt_2.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/usdt_2.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..789883aaca4c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/usdt_2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#if defined(__x86_64__)
+
+/*
+ * Include usdt.h with default nop,nop5 instructions combo.
+ */
+#include "usdt.h"
+
+__attribute__((aligned(16)))
+void usdt_2(void)
+{
+	USDT(optimized_attach, usdt_2);
+}
+
+#endif
-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-20 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-20 10:42 [PATCHv4 bpf-next 0/5] libbpf: Make optimized uprobes backward compatible Jiri Olsa
2026-02-20 10:42 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 1/5] libbpf: Add uprobe syscall feature detection Jiri Olsa
2026-02-20 10:42 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 2/5] libbpf: Add support to detect nop,nop5 instructions combo for usdt probe Jiri Olsa
2026-02-20 11:24   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-02-21 12:00     ` David Laight
2026-02-22 14:32       ` Jiri Olsa
2026-02-20 10:42 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 3/5] selftests/bpf: Emit nop,nop5 instructions combo for x86_64 arch Jiri Olsa
2026-02-20 10:42 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2026-02-20 10:42 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add usdt trigger bench Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260220104220.634154-5-jolsa@kernel.org \
    --to=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.