From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8E20310779; Sun, 22 Feb 2026 13:22:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771766577; cv=none; b=AAzHCLsesbXuogd6DCR6DdLNvQl6yWof6YB4OCpJRohv6tst9XnMzOMzoSHMZuohMK6jMmeWkcIMZbnp/VOTvX/CQ4p448d1l6txPIH58XwnOKy9aKogCVGnE8X2bQ0B6W+y/Hhkqwp6DVESjmG0SScgDLfMTExhFyN/BRAqUec= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771766577; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0mbMX9BtqtnvxjQR8l+kExQENImpF3fn0WEWshLOcIg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KPY8E+D/EYo1UOfPK4bMGs5yVzEuq5oJyLRwyxfyif0TtrlptzDd4wJ5jvhrDreGrxPMkoDSiQ3hajRnRjkQelW7JinzHHhw3aBkxnd+noWgQdZxjU5rsqNpPqojnVBAz+7VbznOdbnS5+rRhtTgT9sGuts/7YlJlwBp7V0BkJo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=R9sNBa2E; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="R9sNBa2E" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2030BC116D0; Sun, 22 Feb 2026 13:22:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1771766576; bh=0mbMX9BtqtnvxjQR8l+kExQENImpF3fn0WEWshLOcIg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=R9sNBa2Eb8hYLRQ45rCdtDokkK8KLjW5T73Y+pb3o6FmvDoDHEizKjNLnS2kGFWZY zM3bUtxLJv8pEQ9vT7gqfgziiztATqgLxdBU4214XixqfijBhTn5WucaDIM8Vrk/IJ MSM8//AVzV5/CVVaQWpTMlJIS6wKDFBI0eLtmRxAEh95HRNYIYEiEqs8szagf+mJ4k sdN4C1l/1R+b3OXA1IvSx0eNo94nCeaYjQW+65uoZsQtOBqdiLk6wpX1R20DcoG6Uj 52G9cS1mhOzpQP6VjIsClI+J+qIxZgWY4nzYpJILsc4NH4WT9/dx52G30ZoG5SBt0n iIuRK0rFua+Rg== Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2026 13:22:46 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Alisa-Dariana Roman , Nuno =?UTF-8?B?U8Oh?= , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen , Michael Hennerich , David Lechner , Nuno =?UTF-8?B?U8Oh?= , Andy Shevchenko , Harshit Mogalapalli Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] iio: adc: ad7192: Revert "properly check spi_get_device_match_data()" Message-ID: <20260222132246.6447d539@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: References: <20260217080514.1288115-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20260218095820.00005750@huawei.com> <20260220105507.30a2f7ec@jic23-huawei> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.1 (GTK 3.24.51; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 13:05:04 +0200 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 10:55:07AM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 09:58:20 +0000 > > Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > ... > > > Applied. I also added a link tag to this thread, to say we had > > agreed to make it policy in IIO to not have these checks. > > Thanks! > > Do we still need a process/maintainer-iio.rst? Yes. Been meaning to start drawing one up for a long time but there is always something else that takes higher priority :( If you want to propose something as a straw man that would be great! Jonathan >