Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] arm: Backward compatibility to U-Boot v2020.04

[Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1249 bytes --]

On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 07:30:13AM +0000, Dorde Stojicevic wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> sorry that it took a while to get the response from Lynx but it couldn´t be helped unfortunately.
> 
> I got the response from Lynx:
> 
> " Hello Dorde.
> 
> I’ve got a replay from our engineering team. We do not support u-boot, so we don’t have any plans to make SRP “ARM64 kernel“ compatible.
> 
> We work with board with default u-boot (for now it is U-Boot SPL 2020.04).
> 
> So, you are free to make any changes in u-boot to make SRP run in newest version of u-boot.
> "
> 
> I am a bit surprised by the response that they don´t seem really interested in it, but it is how it is. So we are free to apply the patch to our liking.
> 
> Let me know how we proceed from here

Well, if they aren't going to do the work, someone needs to do the work
to support the OS. What's happened since 2020.04 is that we now
correctly detect and fail something that claims to be a Linux ARM64
Image, but is not. We aren't going to go back and re-allow that, it was
a bug.

The proposal I outlined for how I think it should look, for proper
support, is something that I hope someone interested / motivated can
look in to doing.

-- 
Tom

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]