All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
	Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>,
	"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: [linus:master] [slab]  17c38c8829: will-it-scale.per_process_ops 60.5% regression
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 15:26:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202602261526.dc2fdec-lkp@intel.com> (raw)



Hello,

kernel test robot noticed a 60.5% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops on:


commit: 17c38c88294d75506c67cae378c9e940d1ce55e3 ("slab: remove cpu (partial) slabs usage from allocation paths")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master

[still regression on linus/master      8bf22c33e7a172fbc72464f4cc484d23a6b412ba]
[still regression on linux-next/master 44982d352c33767cd8d19f8044e7e1161a587ff7]

testcase: will-it-scale
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4
compiler: gcc-14
test machine: 48 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz (Ivy Bridge-EP) with 64G memory
parameters:

	nr_task: 100%
	mode: process
	test: brk1
	cpufreq_governor: performance



If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202602261526.dc2fdec-lkp@intel.com


Details are as below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->


The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260226/202602261526.dc2fdec-lkp@intel.com

=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/mode/nr_task/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
  gcc-14/performance/x86_64-rhel-9.4/process/100%/debian-13-x86_64-20250902.cgz/lkp-ivb-2ep2/brk1/will-it-scale

commit: 
  ed30c4adfc ("slab: add optimized sheaf refill from partial list")
  17c38c8829 ("slab: remove cpu (partial) slabs usage from allocation paths")

ed30c4adfc2b5690 17c38c88294d75506c67cae378c 
---------------- --------------------------- 
         %stddev     %change         %stddev
             \          |                \  
  22625956           -60.5%    8947026        will-it-scale.48.processes
    471373           -60.5%     186395        will-it-scale.per_process_ops
  22625956           -60.5%    8947026        will-it-scale.workload
     20.65           -74.9%       5.19        vmstat.cpu.us
     10502 ±  3%     -87.0%       1366 ±  9%  vmstat.system.cs
      1.31            -0.1        1.20        mpstat.cpu.all.irq%
      4.13            -1.9        2.21        mpstat.cpu.all.soft%
     73.24           +17.4       90.61        mpstat.cpu.all.sys%
     20.67           -15.3        5.36        mpstat.cpu.all.usr%
    179.60            -4.1%     172.24        turbostat.CorWatt
      0.39           -40.0%       0.23 ±  2%  turbostat.IPC
    211.17            -4.4%     201.86        turbostat.PkgWatt
     21.36           -45.0%      11.76        turbostat.RAMWatt
      0.07 ±  6%     -38.7%       0.04 ±  9%  perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.[unknown].[unknown].[unknown].[unknown].[unknown]
      0.07 ±  6%     -38.7%       0.04 ±  9%  perf-sched.total_sch_delay.average.ms
     18.17 ±  3%    +262.0%      65.77 ±  8%  perf-sched.total_wait_and_delay.average.ms
     47429 ±  4%     -84.9%       7139 ± 10%  perf-sched.total_wait_and_delay.count.ms
     18.10 ±  3%    +263.2%      65.72 ±  8%  perf-sched.total_wait_time.average.ms
     18.17 ±  3%    +262.0%      65.77 ±  8%  perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.[unknown].[unknown].[unknown].[unknown].[unknown]
     47429 ±  4%     -84.9%       7139 ± 10%  perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.[unknown].[unknown].[unknown].[unknown].[unknown]
     18.10 ±  3%    +263.2%      65.72 ±  8%  perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.[unknown].[unknown].[unknown].[unknown].[unknown]
      0.68           -83.8%       0.11 ±  6%  perf-stat.i.MPKI
 1.657e+10           -35.2%  1.073e+10        perf-stat.i.branch-instructions
      0.27 ±  2%      +0.1        0.34 ±  2%  perf-stat.i.branch-miss-rate%
  43387409           -17.1%   35980500 ±  2%  perf-stat.i.branch-misses
     38.35           -35.8        2.53 ±  6%  perf-stat.i.cache-miss-rate%
  56795946           -90.4%    5475678 ±  6%  perf-stat.i.cache-misses
  1.48e+08           +48.5%  2.198e+08        perf-stat.i.cache-references
     10520 ±  3%     -87.4%       1322 ±  9%  perf-stat.i.context-switches
      1.70           +65.9%       2.81        perf-stat.i.cpi
      2499         +1000.8%      27508 ±  6%  perf-stat.i.cycles-between-cache-misses
 8.369e+10           -39.7%  5.048e+10        perf-stat.i.instructions
      0.59           -39.7%       0.36        perf-stat.i.ipc
      0.68           -84.0%       0.11 ±  6%  perf-stat.overall.MPKI
      0.26            +0.1        0.34 ±  2%  perf-stat.overall.branch-miss-rate%
     38.37           -35.9        2.49 ±  6%  perf-stat.overall.cache-miss-rate%
      1.70           +65.9%       2.81        perf-stat.overall.cpi
      2500          +942.6%      26067 ±  6%  perf-stat.overall.cycles-between-cache-misses
      0.59           -39.7%       0.36        perf-stat.overall.ipc
   1117006           +52.3%    1700887        perf-stat.overall.path-length
 1.651e+10           -35.2%  1.069e+10        perf-stat.ps.branch-instructions
  43243442           -17.1%   35861582 ±  2%  perf-stat.ps.branch-misses
  56607711           -90.4%    5457714 ±  6%  perf-stat.ps.cache-misses
 1.475e+08           +48.5%  2.191e+08        perf-stat.ps.cache-references
     10485 ±  3%     -87.4%       1318 ±  9%  perf-stat.ps.context-switches
 8.341e+10           -39.7%  5.031e+10        perf-stat.ps.instructions
 2.527e+13           -39.8%  1.522e+13        perf-stat.total.instructions




Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.


-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki



                 reply	other threads:[~2026-02-26  7:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202602261526.dc2fdec-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.