From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Cheng Li <lechain@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 next 07/17] tools/nolibc/printf: Move snprintf length check to callback
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 22:11:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260226221150.140ec68a@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dddbec05-2fff-4aa0-89df-2c49144932cf@t-8ch.de>
On Thu, 26 Feb 2026 22:29:07 +0100
Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> wrote:
> On 2026-02-25 23:12:21+0000, David Laight wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Feb 2026 23:37:42 +0100
> > Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> wrote:
> >
> > > On 2026-02-23 10:17:25+0000, david.laight.linux@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > (...)
> > >
> > > > @@ -425,18 +430,25 @@ int __nolibc_printf(__nolibc_printf_cb cb, intptr_t state, size_t n, const char
> > > >
> > > > /* literal char, just queue it */
> > > > }
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Request a final '\0' be added to the snprintf() output.
> > > > + * This may be the only call of the cb() function.
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (cb(state, NULL, 0) != 0)
> > > > + return -1;
> > > > +
> > > > return written;
> > > > }
> > >
> > > (...)
> > >
> > > > +static int __nolibc_sprintf_cb(void *v_state, const char *buf, size_t size)
> > > > {
> > > > - char **state = (char **)_state;
> > > > + struct __nolibc_sprintf_cb_state *state = v_state;
> > > > + size_t space = state->space;
> > > > + char *tgt;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Truncate the request to fit in the output buffer space.
> > > > + * The last byte is reserved for the terminating '\0'.
> > > > + * state->space can only be zero for snprintf(NULL, 0, fmt, args)
> > > > + * so this normally lets through calls with 'size == 0'.
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (size >= space) {
> > > > + if (space <= 1)
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > + size = space - 1;
> > > > + }
> > > > + tgt = state->buf;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* __nolibc_printf() ends with cb(state, NULL, 0) to request the output
> > > > + * buffer be '\0' terminated.
> > > > + * That will be the only cb() call for, eg, snprintf(buf, sz, "").
> > > > + * Zero lengths can occur at other times (eg "%s" for an empty string).
> > > > + * Unconditionally write the '\0' byte to reduce code size, it is
> > > > + * normally overwritten by the data being output.
> > > > + * There is no point adding a '\0' after copied data - there is always
> > > > + * another call.
> > > > + */
> > > > + *tgt = '\0';
> > > > + state->space = space - size;
> > > > + state->buf = tgt + size;
> > > > + memcpy(tgt, buf, size);
> > >
> > > This trips UBSAN for me when 'buf == NULL'.
> > >
> > > if (cb(state, NULL, 0) != 0)
> > > return -1;
> > >
> > > It can be fixed by adding a NULL check around memcpy(),
> > > but I'd rather not do this as a random fixup.
> >
> > Blame Willy, he made me remove the 'if (size)' check to reduce
> > the code size.
>
> Done. But we still can't hard-break our own testsuite.
> If we can detect UBSAN at build-time, that could work.
> But I would prefer to just add the check.
>
> > The '*tgt = 0' line is (only) needed when size is zero, the other lines
> > are clearly pointless.
> > So the 'random fixup' is adding 'if (size)' rather than a NULL
> > pointer check
> > printf("%s", "") will give a zero size with non-NULL buf.
>
> Can you roll this into the next revision?
I'll add the zero check back.
Probably get around to it tomorrow.
At least I don't have to completely re-order the patches again.
I've got about 15 old branches from failed attempts lurking.
David
>
> > IIRC the C standard make memcpy(tgt, NULL, 0) UB because some old system
> > no one has used for 40+ years would trap when NULL was loaded into an
> > 'address register' and they wanted it to be compliant.
>
> Fair enough. But how would this work for functions where NULL is an
> allowed argument value like 'free()'? Anyways, we use UBSAN in the
> testsuite and it actually found a bunch of issues, so I'd like to keep
> it.
>
> > > >
> > > > - memcpy(*state, buf, size);
> > > > - *state += size;
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > >
> > > (...)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-26 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-23 10:17 [PATCH v3 next 00/17] Enhance printf() david.laight.linux
2026-02-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 next 01/17] tools/nolibc: Add _NOLIBC_OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR() to compiler.h david.laight.linux
2026-02-25 21:25 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-25 22:17 ` David Laight
2026-02-25 22:24 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 next 02/17] tools/nolibc: Optimise and common up the number to ascii functions david.laight.linux
2026-02-25 21:40 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-25 22:09 ` David Laight
2026-02-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 next 03/17] selftests/nolibc: Fix build with host headers and libc david.laight.linux
2026-02-25 21:24 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 next 04/17] selftests/nolibc: Improve reporting of vfprintf() errors david.laight.linux
2026-02-25 21:56 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-26 10:12 ` David Laight
2026-02-26 21:39 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 next 05/17] tools/nolibc: Implement strerror() in terms of strerror_r() david.laight.linux
2026-02-25 22:09 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-25 22:58 ` David Laight
2026-02-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 next 06/17] tools/nolibc/printf: Change variables 'c' to 'ch' and 'tmpbuf[]' to 'outbuf[]' david.laight.linux
2026-02-25 22:23 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 next 07/17] tools/nolibc/printf: Move snprintf length check to callback david.laight.linux
2026-02-25 22:37 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-25 23:12 ` David Laight
2026-02-26 21:29 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-26 22:11 ` David Laight [this message]
2026-02-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 next 08/17] tools/nolibc/printf: Output pad characters in 16 byte chunks david.laight.linux
2026-02-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 next 09/17] tools/nolibc/printf: Simplify __nolibc_printf() david.laight.linux
2026-02-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 next 10/17] tools/nolibc/printf: Use goto and reduce indentation david.laight.linux
2026-02-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 next 11/17] tools/nolibc/printf: Use bit-masks to hold requested flag, length and conversion chars david.laight.linux
2026-02-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 next 12/17] tools/nolibc/printf: Handle "%s" with the numeric formats david.laight.linux
2026-02-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 next 13/17] tools/nolibc/printf: Add support for conversion flags david.laight.linux
2026-02-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 next 14/17] tools/nolibc/printf: Add support for left aligning fields david.laight.linux
2026-02-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 next 15/17] tools/nolibc/printf: Add support for zero padding and field precision david.laight.linux
2026-02-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 next 16/17] tools/nolibc/printf: Add support for octal output david.laight.linux
2026-02-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 next 17/17] selftests/nolibc: Use printf variable field widths and precisions david.laight.linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260226221150.140ec68a@pumpkin \
--to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=lechain@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.