From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] cxl/port: Fix use after free of parent_port in cxl_detach_ep()
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 11:53:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260227115308.0000249b@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260226184439.1732841-1-alison.schofield@intel.com>
On Thu, 26 Feb 2026 10:44:36 -0800
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com> wrote:
> cxl_detach_ep() is called during bottom-up removal when all CXL memory
> devices beneath a switch port have been removed. For each port in the
> hierarchy it locks both the port and its parent, removes the endpoint,
> and if the port is now empty, marks it dead and unregisters the port
> by calling delete_switch_port(). There are two places during this work
> where the parent_port may be used after freeing:
>
> First, a concurrent detach may have already processed a port by the
> time a second worker finds it via bus_find_device(). Without pinning
> parent_port, it may already be freed when we discover port->dead and
> attempt to unlock the parent_port. In a production kernel that's a
> silent memory corruption, with lock debug, it looks like this:
>
> []DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(__owner_task(owner) != get_current())
> []WARNING: kernel/locking/mutex.c:949 at __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x1ee/0x310
> []Call Trace:
> []mutex_unlock+0xd/0x20
> []cxl_detach_ep+0x180/0x400 [cxl_core]
> []devm_action_release+0x10/0x20
> []devres_release_all+0xa8/0xe0
> []device_unbind_cleanup+0xd/0xa0
> []really_probe+0x1a6/0x3e0
>
> Second, delete_switch_port() releases three devm actions registered
> against parent_port. The last of those is unregister_port() and it
> calls device_unregister() on the child port, which can cascade. If
> parent_port is now also empty the device core may unregister and free
> it too. So by the time delete_switch_port() returns, parent_port may
> be free, and the subsequent device_unlock(&parent_port->dev) operates
> on freed memory. The kernel log looks same as above, with a different
> offset in cxl_detach_ep().
>
> Both of these issues stem from the absence of a lifetime guarantee
> between a child port and its parent port.
>
> Establish a lifetime rule for ports: child ports hold a reference to
> their parent device until release. Take the reference when the port
> is allocated and drop it when released. This ensures the parent is
> valid for the full lifetime of the child and eliminates the use after
> free window in cxl_detach_ep().
>
> This is easily reproduced with a reload of cxl_acpi in QEMU with CXL
> devices present.
>
> Fixes: 2345df54249c ("cxl/memdev: Fix endpoint port removal")
> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
New rule makes sense to me and implementation looks good.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-27 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-26 18:44 [PATCH v4] cxl/port: Fix use after free of parent_port in cxl_detach_ep() Alison Schofield
2026-02-27 11:53 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-02-28 7:04 ` Li Ming
2026-03-03 0:05 ` Alison Schofield
2026-03-03 20:36 ` Dave Jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260227115308.0000249b@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.