From: hch <hch@lst.de>
To: Wilfred Mallawa <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>
Cc: "djwong@kernel.org" <djwong@kernel.org>, hch <hch@lst.de>,
"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"cem@kernel.org" <cem@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: add write pointer to xfs_rtgroup_geometry
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 14:52:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260227135233.GA20671@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dbda17987ff33a132da82b8635ac2a5c6ae01c78.camel@wdc.com>
On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 05:16:39AM +0000, Wilfred Mallawa wrote:
> > > - __u32 rg_reserved[27]; /* o: zero */
> > > + __u32 rg_reserved0; /* o: preserve alignment */
> > > + __u64 rg_writepointer; /* o: write pointer sector for
> > > zoned */
> >
> > Hrm. It's not possible to advance the write pointer less than a
> > single
> > xfs fsblock, right?
>
> I believe so, perhaps Christoph could chime in?
It's not possible.
>
> > zoned rt requires rt groups, so that means the
> > write pointer within a rtgroup has to be a xfs_rgblock_t (32bit)
> > value,
> > so shouldn't this be a __u32 field?
>
> I figured since this is currently returning a basic block offset
> (similar to a zone report from a zoned device), it *could* exceed a
> U32_MAX for larger zones (?). Does it seem more appropriate to return
> the xfs fsblock offset here instead?
No, the count of blocks in a zone is a xfs_rgblock_t, which is a
uint32_t. So all group/zone relative addressing can and should use
32-bit types.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-27 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-27 3:01 [PATCH] xfs: add write pointer to xfs_rtgroup_geometry Wilfred Mallawa
2026-02-27 4:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-27 5:16 ` Wilfred Mallawa
2026-02-27 13:52 ` hch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260227135233.GA20671@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.