From: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched_ext: Separate lock and first_task into distinct cache lines in scx_dispatch_q
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 13:06:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260228130647.87606-1-devnexen@gmail.com> (raw)
lock (write-heavy) and first_task (read-mostly, lockless RCU peek) share
the same cache line in struct scx_dispatch_q. Every lock acquire/release
by a dispatching CPU invalidates the line for all CPUs performing
lockless first_task peeks, causing unnecessary cache coherence traffic,
especially across NUMA nodes.
Add ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp to first_task to place it on its own
cache line, eliminating this false sharing on SMP systems. On
uniprocessor builds the annotation is a no-op, so no space is wasted.
On SMP, the trade-off is increased struct size: each scx_dispatch_q
grows by up to ~56 bytes of padding. There are two instances embedded
per-CPU in scx_rq (local_dsq and bypass_dsq), plus any dynamically
allocated custom DSQs, so the total overhead scales with the number of
CPUs and active DSQs.
Signed-off-by: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/sched/ext.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/ext.h b/include/linux/sched/ext.h
index bcb962d5ee7d..2988df68a97a 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/ext.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/ext.h
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ enum scx_dsq_id_flags {
*/
struct scx_dispatch_q {
raw_spinlock_t lock;
- struct task_struct __rcu *first_task; /* lockless peek at head */
+ struct task_struct __rcu *first_task ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp; /* lockless peek at head */
struct list_head list; /* tasks in dispatch order */
struct rb_root priq; /* used to order by p->scx.dsq_vtime */
u32 nr;
--
2.51.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-02-28 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-28 13:06 David Carlier [this message]
2026-02-28 17:28 ` [PATCH] sched_ext: Separate lock and first_task into distinct cache lines in scx_dispatch_q Tejun Heo
2026-02-28 18:26 ` David CARLIER
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260228130647.87606-1-devnexen@gmail.com \
--to=devnexen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.