From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org, dianders@chromium.org
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: Patch "mfd: core: Add locking around 'mfd_of_node_list'" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 20:22:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260301012249.1679321-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
Thanks,
Sasha
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 20117c92bcf9c11afd64d7481d8f94fdf410726e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 11:30:03 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] mfd: core: Add locking around 'mfd_of_node_list'
Manipulating a list in the kernel isn't safe without some sort of
mutual exclusion. Add a mutex any time we access / modify
'mfd_of_node_list' to prevent possible crashes.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 466a62d7642f ("mfd: core: Make a best effort attempt to match devices with the correct of_nodes")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251210113002.1.I6ceaca2cfb7eb25737012b166671f516696be4fd@changeid
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
---
drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
index 6925bedddc80b..a30f93bf030aa 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
static LIST_HEAD(mfd_of_node_list);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(mfd_of_node_mutex);
struct mfd_of_node_entry {
struct list_head list;
@@ -104,9 +105,11 @@ static int mfd_match_of_node_to_dev(struct platform_device *pdev,
u64 of_node_addr;
/* Skip if OF node has previously been allocated to a device */
- list_for_each_entry(of_entry, &mfd_of_node_list, list)
- if (of_entry->np == np)
- return -EAGAIN;
+ scoped_guard(mutex, &mfd_of_node_mutex) {
+ list_for_each_entry(of_entry, &mfd_of_node_list, list)
+ if (of_entry->np == np)
+ return -EAGAIN;
+ }
if (!cell->use_of_reg)
/* No of_reg defined - allocate first free compatible match */
@@ -128,7 +131,8 @@ static int mfd_match_of_node_to_dev(struct platform_device *pdev,
of_entry->dev = &pdev->dev;
of_entry->np = np;
- list_add_tail(&of_entry->list, &mfd_of_node_list);
+ scoped_guard(mutex, &mfd_of_node_mutex)
+ list_add_tail(&of_entry->list, &mfd_of_node_list);
of_node_get(np);
device_set_node(&pdev->dev, of_fwnode_handle(np));
@@ -284,11 +288,13 @@ static int mfd_add_device(struct device *parent, int id,
if (cell->swnode)
device_remove_software_node(&pdev->dev);
fail_of_entry:
- list_for_each_entry_safe(of_entry, tmp, &mfd_of_node_list, list)
- if (of_entry->dev == &pdev->dev) {
- list_del(&of_entry->list);
- kfree(of_entry);
- }
+ scoped_guard(mutex, &mfd_of_node_mutex) {
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(of_entry, tmp, &mfd_of_node_list, list)
+ if (of_entry->dev == &pdev->dev) {
+ list_del(&of_entry->list);
+ kfree(of_entry);
+ }
+ }
fail_alias:
regulator_bulk_unregister_supply_alias(&pdev->dev,
cell->parent_supplies,
@@ -358,11 +364,13 @@ static int mfd_remove_devices_fn(struct device *dev, void *data)
if (cell->swnode)
device_remove_software_node(&pdev->dev);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(of_entry, tmp, &mfd_of_node_list, list)
- if (of_entry->dev == &pdev->dev) {
- list_del(&of_entry->list);
- kfree(of_entry);
- }
+ scoped_guard(mutex, &mfd_of_node_mutex) {
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(of_entry, tmp, &mfd_of_node_list, list)
+ if (of_entry->dev == &pdev->dev) {
+ list_del(&of_entry->list);
+ kfree(of_entry);
+ }
+ }
regulator_bulk_unregister_supply_alias(dev, cell->parent_supplies,
cell->num_parent_supplies);
--
2.51.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-03-01 1:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-01 1:22 Sasha Levin [this message]
2026-03-02 3:01 ` FAILED: Patch "mfd: core: Add locking around 'mfd_of_node_list'" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree Doug Anderson
2026-03-09 22:50 ` Doug Anderson
2026-03-10 9:52 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260301012249.1679321-1-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.