From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
"Leon Romanovsky" <leon@kernel.org>,
Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>,
Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>,
Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>,
Or Har-Toov <ohartoov@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V3 10/10] devlink: Document port-level resources
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 19:14:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260302191448.4750a2b8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260226221916.1800227-11-tariqt@nvidia.com>
On Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:19:16 +0200 Tariq Toukan wrote:
> +Currently, port-level resources only support the ``GET`` command for viewing
> +resource information.
In case there is v4, AI says:
> +Currently, port-level resources only support the ``GET`` command for viewing
^^^^^
This isn't a bug, but the terminology here appears inconsistent with the
rest of the documentation. The document uses user-facing command names
elsewhere (like "devlink port resource show"), but this line uses "GET
command" which seems to reference the internal DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_RESOURCE_GET
netlink command.
Should this be reworded to match the user-facing terminology used throughout
the rest of the document, perhaps "only support the show command" or
"only support viewing"?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-03 3:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-26 22:19 [PATCH net-next V3 00/10] devlink: add per-port resource support Tariq Toukan
2026-02-26 22:19 ` [PATCH net-next V3 01/10] devlink: Add dump support for device-level resources Tariq Toukan
2026-02-26 22:19 ` [PATCH net-next V3 02/10] selftest: netdevsim: Add resource dump test Tariq Toukan
2026-02-26 22:19 ` [PATCH net-next V3 03/10] devlink: Add dump to resource documentation Tariq Toukan
2026-02-26 22:19 ` [PATCH net-next V3 04/10] devlink: Refactor resource functions to be generic Tariq Toukan
2026-02-26 22:19 ` [PATCH net-next V3 05/10] devlink: Add port-level resource registration infrastructure Tariq Toukan
2026-02-26 22:19 ` [PATCH net-next V3 06/10] devlink: Add port resource netlink command Tariq Toukan
2026-02-26 22:19 ` [PATCH net-next V3 07/10] net/mlx5: Register SF resource on PF port representor Tariq Toukan
2026-02-26 22:19 ` [PATCH net-next V3 08/10] netdevsim: Add devlink port resource registration Tariq Toukan
2026-02-26 22:19 ` [PATCH net-next V3 09/10] selftest: netdevsim: Add devlink port resource test Tariq Toukan
2026-02-26 22:19 ` [PATCH net-next V3 10/10] devlink: Document port-level resources Tariq Toukan
2026-03-03 3:14 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-03-04 10:06 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-03-03 3:26 ` [PATCH net-next V3 00/10] devlink: add per-port resource support Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-04 10:05 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-03-04 10:34 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-03-04 18:15 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-05 7:56 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-03-05 14:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-06 12:13 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-03-06 20:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-08 16:03 ` Or Har-Toov
2026-03-09 20:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-11 18:24 ` Or Har-Toov
2026-03-11 21:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-12 8:34 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-03-12 14:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-12 14:29 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-03-12 14:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260302191448.4750a2b8@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=moshe@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ohartoov@nvidia.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=shayd@nvidia.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.