From: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v7 04/26] KVM: selftests: Add a test for LBR save/restore (ft. nested)
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 00:33:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260303003421.2185681-5-yosry@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260303003421.2185681-1-yosry@kernel.org>
Add a selftest exercising save/restore with usage of LBRs in both L1 and
L2, and making sure all LBRs remain intact.
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm | 1 +
.../selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h | 5 +
.../selftests/kvm/x86/svm_lbr_nested_state.c | 145 ++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 151 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/svm_lbr_nested_state.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
index fdec90e854671..36b48e766e499 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/svm_vmcall_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/svm_int_ctl_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/svm_nested_shutdown_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/svm_nested_soft_inject_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/svm_lbr_nested_state
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/tsc_scaling_sync
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/sync_regs_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/ucna_injection_test
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h
index 4ebae4269e681..db0171935197d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h
@@ -1360,6 +1360,11 @@ static inline bool kvm_is_ignore_msrs(void)
return get_kvm_param_bool("ignore_msrs");
}
+static inline bool kvm_is_lbrv_enabled(void)
+{
+ return !!get_kvm_amd_param_integer("lbrv");
+}
+
uint64_t *vm_get_pte(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint64_t vaddr);
uint64_t kvm_hypercall(uint64_t nr, uint64_t a0, uint64_t a1, uint64_t a2,
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/svm_lbr_nested_state.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/svm_lbr_nested_state.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..bf16abb1152e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/svm_lbr_nested_state.c
@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2026, Google, Inc.
+ */
+
+#include "test_util.h"
+#include "kvm_util.h"
+#include "processor.h"
+#include "svm_util.h"
+
+
+#define L2_GUEST_STACK_SIZE 64
+
+#define DO_BRANCH() do { asm volatile("jmp 1f\n 1: nop"); } while (0)
+
+struct lbr_branch {
+ u64 from, to;
+};
+
+volatile struct lbr_branch l2_branch;
+
+#define RECORD_AND_CHECK_BRANCH(b) \
+do { \
+ wrmsr(MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR, DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR); \
+ DO_BRANCH(); \
+ (b)->from = rdmsr(MSR_IA32_LASTBRANCHFROMIP); \
+ (b)->to = rdmsr(MSR_IA32_LASTBRANCHTOIP); \
+ /* Disable LBR right after to avoid overriding the IPs */ \
+ wrmsr(MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR, 0); \
+ \
+ GUEST_ASSERT_NE((b)->from, 0); \
+ GUEST_ASSERT_NE((b)->to, 0); \
+} while (0)
+
+#define CHECK_BRANCH_MSRS(b) \
+do { \
+ GUEST_ASSERT_EQ((b)->from, rdmsr(MSR_IA32_LASTBRANCHFROMIP)); \
+ GUEST_ASSERT_EQ((b)->to, rdmsr(MSR_IA32_LASTBRANCHTOIP)); \
+} while (0)
+
+#define CHECK_BRANCH_VMCB(b, vmcb) \
+do { \
+ GUEST_ASSERT_EQ((b)->from, vmcb->save.br_from); \
+ GUEST_ASSERT_EQ((b)->to, vmcb->save.br_to); \
+} while (0)
+
+static void l2_guest_code(struct svm_test_data *svm)
+{
+ /* Record a branch, trigger save/restore, and make sure LBRs are intact */
+ RECORD_AND_CHECK_BRANCH(&l2_branch);
+ GUEST_SYNC(true);
+ CHECK_BRANCH_MSRS(&l2_branch);
+ vmmcall();
+}
+
+static void l1_guest_code(struct svm_test_data *svm, bool nested_lbrv)
+{
+ unsigned long l2_guest_stack[L2_GUEST_STACK_SIZE];
+ struct vmcb *vmcb = svm->vmcb;
+ struct lbr_branch l1_branch;
+
+ /* Record a branch, trigger save/restore, and make sure LBRs are intact */
+ RECORD_AND_CHECK_BRANCH(&l1_branch);
+ GUEST_SYNC(true);
+ CHECK_BRANCH_MSRS(&l1_branch);
+
+ /* Run L2, which will also do the same */
+ generic_svm_setup(svm, l2_guest_code,
+ &l2_guest_stack[L2_GUEST_STACK_SIZE]);
+
+ if (nested_lbrv)
+ vmcb->control.virt_ext = LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK;
+ else
+ vmcb->control.virt_ext &= ~LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK;
+
+ run_guest(vmcb, svm->vmcb_gpa);
+ GUEST_ASSERT(svm->vmcb->control.exit_code == SVM_EXIT_VMMCALL);
+
+ /* Trigger save/restore one more time before checking, just for kicks */
+ GUEST_SYNC(true);
+
+ /*
+ * If LBR_CTL_ENABLE is set, L1 and L2 should have separate LBR MSRs, so
+ * expect L1's LBRs to remain intact and L2 LBRs to be in the VMCB.
+ * Otherwise, the MSRs are shared between L1 & L2 so expect L2's LBRs.
+ */
+ if (nested_lbrv) {
+ CHECK_BRANCH_MSRS(&l1_branch);
+ CHECK_BRANCH_VMCB(&l2_branch, vmcb);
+ } else {
+ CHECK_BRANCH_MSRS(&l2_branch);
+ }
+ GUEST_DONE();
+}
+
+void test_lbrv_nested_state(bool nested_lbrv)
+{
+ struct kvm_x86_state *state = NULL;
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ vm_vaddr_t svm_gva;
+ struct kvm_vm *vm;
+ struct ucall uc;
+
+ pr_info("Testing with nested LBRV %s\n", nested_lbrv ? "enabled" : "disabled");
+
+ vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, l1_guest_code);
+ vcpu_alloc_svm(vm, &svm_gva);
+ vcpu_args_set(vcpu, 2, svm_gva, nested_lbrv);
+
+ for (;;) {
+ vcpu_run(vcpu);
+ TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO);
+ switch (get_ucall(vcpu, &uc)) {
+ case UCALL_SYNC:
+ /* Save the vCPU state and restore it in a new VM on sync */
+ pr_info("Guest triggered save/restore.\n");
+ state = vcpu_save_state(vcpu);
+ kvm_vm_release(vm);
+ vcpu = vm_recreate_with_one_vcpu(vm);
+ vcpu_load_state(vcpu, state);
+ kvm_x86_state_cleanup(state);
+ break;
+ case UCALL_ABORT:
+ REPORT_GUEST_ASSERT(uc);
+ /* NOT REACHED */
+ case UCALL_DONE:
+ goto done;
+ default:
+ TEST_FAIL("Unknown ucall %lu", uc.cmd);
+ }
+ }
+done:
+ kvm_vm_free(vm);
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+ TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SVM));
+ TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_is_lbrv_enabled());
+
+ test_lbrv_nested_state(/*nested_lbrv=*/false);
+ test_lbrv_nested_state(/*nested_lbrv=*/true);
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.53.0.473.g4a7958ca14-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-03 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-03 0:33 [PATCH v7 00/26] Nested SVM fixes, cleanups, and hardening Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:33 ` [PATCH v7 01/26] KVM: nSVM: Avoid clearing VMCB_LBR in vmcb12 Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:33 ` [PATCH v7 02/26] KVM: SVM: Switch svm_copy_lbrs() to a macro Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:33 ` [PATCH v7 03/26] KVM: SVM: Add missing save/restore handling of LBR MSRs Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 16:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-03-03 19:14 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-04 0:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-03-04 0:48 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:33 ` Yosry Ahmed [this message]
2026-03-03 0:33 ` [PATCH v7 05/26] KVM: nSVM: Always inject a #GP if mapping VMCB12 fails on nested VMRUN Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:34 ` [PATCH v7 06/26] KVM: nSVM: Refactor checking LBRV enablement in vmcb12 into a helper Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:34 ` [PATCH v7 07/26] KVM: nSVM: Refactor writing vmcb12 on nested #VMEXIT as " Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:34 ` [PATCH v7 08/26] KVM: nSVM: Triple fault if mapping VMCB12 fails on nested #VMEXIT Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:34 ` [PATCH v7 09/26] KVM: nSVM: Triple fault if restore host CR3 " Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 16:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-03-03 19:15 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:34 ` [PATCH v7 10/26] KVM: nSVM: Clear GIF on nested #VMEXIT(INVALID) Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:34 ` [PATCH v7 11/26] KVM: nSVM: Clear EVENTINJ fields in vmcb12 on nested #VMEXIT Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:34 ` [PATCH v7 12/26] KVM: nSVM: Clear tracking of L1->L2 NMI and soft IRQ " Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 16:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-03-03 19:15 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:34 ` [PATCH v7 13/26] KVM: nSVM: Drop nested_vmcb_check_{save/control}() wrappers Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:34 ` [PATCH v7 14/26] KVM: nSVM: Drop the non-architectural consistency check for NP_ENABLE Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:34 ` [PATCH v7 15/26] KVM: nSVM: Add missing consistency check for nCR3 validity Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 16:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-03-03 19:17 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:34 ` [PATCH v7 16/26] KVM: nSVM: Add missing consistency check for EFER, CR0, CR4, and CS Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:34 ` [PATCH v7 17/26] KVM: nSVM: Add missing consistency check for EVENTINJ Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:34 ` [PATCH v7 18/26] KVM: SVM: Rename vmcb->nested_ctl to vmcb->misc_ctl Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:34 ` [PATCH v7 19/26] KVM: SVM: Rename vmcb->virt_ext to vmcb->misc_ctl2 Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:34 ` [PATCH v7 20/26] KVM: nSVM: Cache all used fields from VMCB12 Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:34 ` [PATCH v7 21/26] KVM: nSVM: Restrict mapping vmcb12 on nested VMRUN Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:34 ` [PATCH v7 22/26] KVM: nSVM: Use PAGE_MASK to drop lower bits of bitmap GPAs from vmcb12 Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:34 ` [PATCH v7 23/26] KVM: nSVM: Sanitize TLB_CONTROL field when copying " Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:34 ` [PATCH v7 24/26] KVM: nSVM: Sanitize INT/EVENTINJ fields " Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:34 ` [PATCH v7 25/26] KVM: nSVM: Only copy SVM_MISC_ENABLE_NP from VMCB01's misc_ctl Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-03 0:34 ` [PATCH v7 26/26] KVM: selftest: Add a selftest for VMRUN/#VMEXIT with unmappable vmcb12 Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-05 22:30 ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-05 22:52 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-06 0:05 ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-06 0:40 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-06 1:17 ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-06 1:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-03-06 1:46 ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-06 15:52 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-06 17:54 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-06 22:15 ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-06 22:35 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-06 16:09 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-06 16:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-03-06 17:25 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-05 17:08 ` [PATCH v7 00/26] Nested SVM fixes, cleanups, and hardening Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260303003421.2185681-5-yosry@kernel.org \
--to=yosry@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.