All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Allen Hubbe <allenbh@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	ntb@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] net: ntb_netdev: Support ethtool channels for multi-queue
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 17:19:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260304171930.5c3625eb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260228145538.3955864-5-den@valinux.co.jp>

On Sat, 28 Feb 2026 23:55:38 +0900 Koichiro Den wrote:
> +static const struct ntb_queue_handlers ntb_netdev_handlers;

can we move some code around to avoid this forward declaration?

> +static int ntb_set_channels(struct net_device *ndev,
> +			    struct ethtool_channels *channels)
> +{
> +	struct ntb_netdev *dev = netdev_priv(ndev);
> +	unsigned int new = channels->combined_count;
> +	unsigned int old = dev->num_queues;
> +	bool running = netif_running(ndev);
> +	struct ntb_netdev_queue *queue;
> +	unsigned int q, created;
> +	int rc = 0;
> +
> +	if (channels->rx_count || channels->tx_count || channels->other_count)
> +		return -EINVAL;

Pretty sure core will protect from this since your get will return 0
for corresponding max values

> +	if (!new || new > ndev->num_tx_queues)
> +		return -ERANGE;

same, core should protect against this

> +	if (new == old)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (new < old) {
> +		if (running)
> +			for (q = new; q < old; q++)
> +				netif_stop_subqueue(ndev, q);
> +
> +		rc = netif_set_real_num_queues(ndev, new, new);
> +		if (rc)
> +			goto out_restore;
> +
> +		/* Publish new queue count before invalidating QP pointers */
> +		dev->num_queues = new;
> +
> +		for (q = new; q < old; q++) {
> +			queue = &dev->queues[q];
> +
> +			if (running) {
> +				ntb_transport_link_down(queue->qp);
> +				ntb_netdev_queue_rx_drain(queue);
> +				timer_delete_sync(&queue->tx_timer);
> +			}
> +
> +			ntb_transport_free_queue(queue->qp);
> +			queue->qp = NULL;
> +		}
> +
> +		goto out_restore;
> +	}
> +
> +	created = old;
> +	for (q = old; q < new; q++) {
> +		queue = &dev->queues[q];
> +
> +		queue->ntdev = dev;
> +		queue->qid = q;
> +		queue->qp = ntb_transport_create_queue(queue, dev->client_dev,
> +						       &ntb_netdev_handlers);
> +		if (!queue->qp) {
> +			rc = -ENOSPC;
> +			goto err_new;
> +		}
> +		created++;
> +
> +		if (!running)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		timer_setup(&queue->tx_timer, ntb_netdev_tx_timer, 0);
> +
> +		rc = ntb_netdev_queue_rx_fill(ndev, queue);
> +		if (rc)
> +			goto err_new;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Carrier may already be on due to other QPs. Keep the new
> +		 * subqueue stopped until we get a Link Up event for this QP.
> +		 */
> +		netif_stop_subqueue(ndev, q);
> +	}
> +
> +	rc = netif_set_real_num_queues(ndev, new, new);
> +	if (rc)
> +		goto err_new;
> +
> +	dev->num_queues = new;
> +
> +	if (running)
> +		for (q = old; q < new; q++)
> +			ntb_transport_link_up(dev->queues[q].qp);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_new:
> +	if (running) {
> +		unsigned int rollback = created;
> +
> +		while (rollback-- > old) {
> +			queue = &dev->queues[rollback];
> +			ntb_transport_link_down(queue->qp);
> +			ntb_netdev_queue_rx_drain(queue);
> +			timer_delete_sync(&queue->tx_timer);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	while (created-- > old) {
> +		queue = &dev->queues[created];
> +		ntb_transport_free_queue(queue->qp);
> +		queue->qp = NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +out_restore:
> +	if (running) {
> +		ntb_netdev_sync_subqueues(dev);
> +		ntb_netdev_update_carrier(dev);
> +	}
> +	return rc;
> +}

The logic LGTM, but the function is a little long.
Would it be possible to split it up?

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-05  1:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-28 14:55 [PATCH v2 0/4] net: ntb_netdev: Add Multi-queue support Koichiro Den
2026-02-28 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] net: ntb_netdev: Introduce per-queue context Koichiro Den
2026-03-05  1:13   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-05 13:56     ` Koichiro Den
2026-02-28 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] net: ntb_netdev: Gate subqueue stop/wake by transport link Koichiro Den
2026-02-28 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] net: ntb_netdev: Factor out multi-queue helpers Koichiro Den
2026-02-28 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] net: ntb_netdev: Support ethtool channels for multi-queue Koichiro Den
2026-03-05  1:19   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-03-05 13:47     ` Koichiro Den

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260304171930.5c3625eb@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=allenbh@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ntb@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.