Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add mm-related procfs files to MM sections

[SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>]

On Thu, 05 Mar 2026 09:26:29 +0100 "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org> wrote:

> Some procfs files are very much related to memory management so let's
> have MAINTAINERS reflect that.
> 
> Add fs/proc/meminfo.c to MEMORY MANAGEMENT - CORE.
> 
> Add fs/proc/task_[no]mmu.c to MEMORY MAPPING.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>

I have a few trivial comments below.  Regardless of those,

Acked-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>

> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 3553554019e8..39987895bcfc 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -16683,6 +16683,7 @@ F:	include/linux/ptdump.h
>  F:	include/linux/vmpressure.h
>  F:	include/linux/vmstat.h
>  F:	include/trace/events/zone_lock.h
> +F:	fs/proc/meminfo.c

Should we sort files alphabetically, and hence put this before 'include/...' ?

I see a few other MAINTAINERS sections including 'MEMORY MANGEMENT -
USERFAULTFD' are doing so.  I have no strong opinion, though.

>  F:	kernel/fork.c
>  F:	mm/Kconfig
>  F:	mm/debug.c
> @@ -16998,6 +16999,8 @@ S:	Maintained
>  W:	http://www.linux-mm.org
>  T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
>  F:	include/trace/events/mmap.h
> +F:	fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +F:	fs/proc/task_nommu.c

Ditto.


Thanks,
SJ

[...]