All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] locking: add mutex_lock_nospin()
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2026 02:12:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202603070239.YyGTDfDj-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260304074650.58165-2-laoar.shao@gmail.com>

Hi Yafang,

[This is a private test report for your RFC patch.]
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on tip/locking/core]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v7.0-rc2 next-20260305]
[cannot apply to trace/for-next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yafang-Shao/locking-add-mutex_lock_nospin/20260304-155633
base:   tip/locking/core
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260304074650.58165-2-laoar.shao%40gmail.com
patch subject: [RFC PATCH 1/2] locking: add mutex_lock_nospin()
config: arm-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260307/202603070239.YyGTDfDj-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 23.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project c32caeec8158d634bb71ab8911a6031248b9fc47)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260307/202603070239.YyGTDfDj-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603070239.YyGTDfDj-lkp@intel.com/

All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> kernel/locking/mutex.c:299:3: error: call to undeclared function '__mutex_lock_nospin'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     299 |                 __mutex_lock_nospin(lock);
         |                 ^
   kernel/locking/mutex.c:299:3: note: did you mean 'mutex_lock_nospin'?
   kernel/locking/mutex.c:294:14: note: 'mutex_lock_nospin' declared here
     294 | void __sched mutex_lock_nospin(struct mutex *lock)
         |              ^
     295 | {
     296 |         might_sleep();
     297 | 
     298 |         if (!__mutex_trylock_fast(lock))
     299 |                 __mutex_lock_nospin(lock);
         |                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |                 mutex_lock_nospin
>> kernel/locking/mutex.c:630:48: error: too many arguments to function call, expected 3, have 4
     630 |             mutex_optimistic_spin(lock, ww_ctx, NULL, nospin)) {
         |             ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~                     ^~~~~~
   kernel/locking/mutex.c:532:1: note: 'mutex_optimistic_spin' declared here
     532 | mutex_optimistic_spin(struct mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx,
         | ^                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     533 |                       struct mutex_waiter *waiter)
         |                       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/locking/mutex.c:731:53: error: too many arguments to function call, expected 3, have 4
     731 |                         if (mutex_optimistic_spin(lock, ww_ctx, &waiter, nospin))
         |                             ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~                        ^~~~~~
   kernel/locking/mutex.c:532:1: note: 'mutex_optimistic_spin' declared here
     532 | mutex_optimistic_spin(struct mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx,
         | ^                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     533 |                       struct mutex_waiter *waiter)
         |                       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> kernel/locking/mutex.c:792:1: warning: no previous prototype for function '__mutex_lock_nospin' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
     792 | __mutex_lock_nospin(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclass,
         | ^
   kernel/locking/mutex.c:791:8: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
     791 | static int __sched
         |        ^
   1 warning and 3 errors generated.


vim +/__mutex_lock_nospin +299 kernel/locking/mutex.c

   293	
   294	void __sched mutex_lock_nospin(struct mutex *lock)
   295	{
   296		might_sleep();
   297	
   298		if (!__mutex_trylock_fast(lock))
 > 299			__mutex_lock_nospin(lock);
   300	}
   301	#endif
   302	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-06 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-04  7:46 [RFC PATCH 0/2] disable optimistic spinning for ftrace_lock Yafang Shao
2026-03-04  7:46 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] locking: add mutex_lock_nospin() Yafang Shao
2026-03-04  9:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-04  9:37     ` Yafang Shao
2026-03-04 10:11       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-04 11:52         ` Yafang Shao
2026-03-04 12:41           ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-04 14:25             ` Yafang Shao
2026-03-04  9:54     ` David Laight
2026-03-04 20:57       ` Steven Rostedt
2026-03-04 21:44         ` David Laight
2026-03-05  2:17           ` Yafang Shao
2026-03-05  2:28             ` Steven Rostedt
2026-03-05  2:33               ` Yafang Shao
2026-03-05  3:00                 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-03-05  3:08                   ` Yafang Shao
2026-03-05  4:30                     ` Waiman Long
2026-03-05  5:40                       ` Yafang Shao
2026-03-05 13:21                         ` Steven Rostedt
2026-03-06  2:22                           ` Yafang Shao
2026-03-06 10:00                             ` David Laight
2026-03-09  2:34                               ` Yafang Shao
2026-03-05 18:34                         ` Waiman Long
2026-03-05 18:44                           ` Waiman Long
2026-03-06  2:27                             ` Yafang Shao
2026-03-05  9:32                       ` David Laight
2026-03-05 19:00                         ` Waiman Long
2026-03-06  2:33                           ` Yafang Shao
2026-03-06 18:12   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2026-03-06 18:24   ` kernel test robot
2026-03-04  7:46 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] ftrace: disable optimistic spinning for ftrace_lock Yafang Shao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202603070239.YyGTDfDj-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.