All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: "Steven Price" <steven.price@arm.com>,
	"Liviu Dudau" <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
	"Adrián Larumbe" <adrian.larumbe@collabora.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kernel@collabora.com,
	"Nicolas Frattaroli" <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>,
	"Philipp Stanner" <phasta@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/panthor: Fix the "done_fence is initialized" detection logic
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 12:06:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260309120656.5821431e@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd0bcaeb-0a0f-4415-b964-ea1d5219b671@amd.com>

On Mon, 9 Mar 2026 11:50:16 +0100
Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> wrote:

> On 3/9/26 11:30, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > After commit 541c8f2468b9 ("dma-buf: detach fence ops on signal
> > v3"), dma_fence::ops == NULL can't be used to check if the fence is
> > initialized or not. We could turn this into an "is_signaled() ||
> > ops == NULL" test, but that's fragile, since it's still subject to
> > dma_fence internal changes. So let's have the "is_initialized"
> > state encoded directly in the pointer through the lowest bit which
> > is guaranteed to be unused because of the dma_fence alignment
> > constraint.  
> 
> We added the dma_fence_was_initialized() function exactly for this
> use case and fixed all callers.

Oh, I somehow missed that helper. Will respin. Thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-09 11:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-09 10:30 [PATCH] drm/panthor: Fix the "done_fence is initialized" detection logic Boris Brezillon
2026-03-09 10:50 ` Christian König
2026-03-09 11:06   ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2026-03-09 11:05 ` Liviu Dudau
2026-03-09 13:15   ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-09 14:54     ` Liviu Dudau
2026-03-09 15:32       ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-09 11:06 ` Nicolas Frattaroli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260309120656.5821431e@fedora \
    --to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=adrian.larumbe@collabora.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com \
    --cc=phasta@kernel.org \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.