All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: Move nested_run_pending to kvm_vcpu_arch
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 15:45:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260310224546.2582118-2-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260310224546.2582118-1-seanjc@google.com>

From: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>

Move nested_run_pending field present in both svm_nested_state and
nested_vmx to the common kvm_vcpu_arch. This allows for common code to
use without plumbing it through per-vendor helpers.

nested_run_pending remains zero-initialized, as the entire kvm_vcpu
struct is, and all further accesses are done through vcpu->arch instead
of svm->nested or vmx->nested.

No functional change intended.

Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>
[sean: expand the commend in the field declaration]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  9 +++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c       | 18 ++++++-------
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c          | 16 ++++++------
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h          |  4 ---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c       | 46 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c          | 16 ++++++------
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h          |  3 ---
 7 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index c94556fefb75..a1bf0aaedad8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1099,6 +1099,15 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 	 */
 	bool pdptrs_from_userspace;
 
+	/*
+	 * Set if an emulated nested VM-Enter to L2 is pending completion.  KVM
+	 * must not synthesize a VM-Exit to L1 before entering L2, as VM-Exits
+	 * can only occur at instruction boundaries.  The only exception is
+	 * VMX's "notify" exits, which exist in large part to break the CPU out
+	 * of infinite ucode loops, but can corrupt vCPU state in the process!
+	 */
+	bool nested_run_pending;
+
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
 	hpa_t hv_root_tdp;
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
index b191c6cab57d..782d6a34d173 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 	 * the CPU and/or KVM and should be used regardless of L1's support.
 	 */
 	if (guest_cpu_cap_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_NRIPS) ||
-	    !svm->nested.nested_run_pending)
+	    !vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending)
 		vmcb02->control.next_rip = vmcb12_ctrl->next_rip;
 
 	svm->nmi_l1_to_l2 = is_evtinj_nmi(vmcb02->control.event_inj);
@@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 	if (is_evtinj_soft(vmcb02->control.event_inj)) {
 		svm->soft_int_injected = true;
 		if (guest_cpu_cap_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_NRIPS) ||
-		    !svm->nested.nested_run_pending)
+		    !vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending)
 			svm->soft_int_next_rip = vmcb12_ctrl->next_rip;
 	}
 
@@ -1131,11 +1131,11 @@ int nested_svm_vmrun(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (!npt_enabled)
 		vmcb01->save.cr3 = kvm_read_cr3(vcpu);
 
-	svm->nested.nested_run_pending = 1;
+	vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending = 1;
 
 	if (enter_svm_guest_mode(vcpu, vmcb12_gpa, true) ||
 	    !nested_svm_merge_msrpm(vcpu)) {
-		svm->nested.nested_run_pending = 0;
+		vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending = 0;
 		svm->nmi_l1_to_l2 = false;
 		svm->soft_int_injected = false;
 
@@ -1277,7 +1277,7 @@ void nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 	/* Exit Guest-Mode */
 	leave_guest_mode(vcpu);
 	svm->nested.vmcb12_gpa = 0;
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(svm->nested.nested_run_pending);
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending);
 
 	kvm_clear_request(KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES, vcpu);
 
@@ -1487,7 +1487,7 @@ void svm_leave_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
 
 	if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)) {
-		svm->nested.nested_run_pending = 0;
+		vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending = 0;
 		svm->nested.vmcb12_gpa = INVALID_GPA;
 
 		leave_guest_mode(vcpu);
@@ -1672,7 +1672,7 @@ static int svm_check_nested_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	 * previously injected event, the pending exception occurred while said
 	 * event was being delivered and thus needs to be handled.
 	 */
-	bool block_nested_exceptions = svm->nested.nested_run_pending;
+	bool block_nested_exceptions = vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending;
 	/*
 	 * New events (not exceptions) are only recognized at instruction
 	 * boundaries.  If an event needs reinjection, then KVM is handling a
@@ -1847,7 +1847,7 @@ static int svm_get_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		kvm_state.size += KVM_STATE_NESTED_SVM_VMCB_SIZE;
 		kvm_state.flags |= KVM_STATE_NESTED_GUEST_MODE;
 
-		if (svm->nested.nested_run_pending)
+		if (vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending)
 			kvm_state.flags |= KVM_STATE_NESTED_RUN_PENDING;
 	}
 
@@ -1984,7 +1984,7 @@ static int svm_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 
 	svm_set_gif(svm, !!(kvm_state->flags & KVM_STATE_NESTED_GIF_SET));
 
-	svm->nested.nested_run_pending =
+	vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending =
 		!!(kvm_state->flags & KVM_STATE_NESTED_RUN_PENDING);
 
 	svm->nested.vmcb12_gpa = kvm_state->hdr.svm.vmcb_pa;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 3407deac90bd..112731515ee3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -3831,7 +3831,7 @@ static void svm_fixup_nested_rips(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
 
-	if (!is_guest_mode(vcpu) || !svm->nested.nested_run_pending)
+	if (!is_guest_mode(vcpu) || !vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending)
 		return;
 
 	/*
@@ -3979,7 +3979,7 @@ bool svm_nmi_blocked(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 static int svm_nmi_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool for_injection)
 {
 	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
-	if (svm->nested.nested_run_pending)
+	if (vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending)
 		return -EBUSY;
 
 	if (svm_nmi_blocked(vcpu))
@@ -4021,7 +4021,7 @@ static int svm_interrupt_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool for_injection)
 {
 	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
 
-	if (svm->nested.nested_run_pending)
+	if (vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending)
 		return -EBUSY;
 
 	if (svm_interrupt_blocked(vcpu))
@@ -4244,7 +4244,7 @@ static void svm_complete_soft_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 vector,
 	 * the soft int and will reinject it via the standard injection flow,
 	 * and so KVM needs to grab the state from the pending nested VMRUN.
 	 */
-	if (is_guest_mode(vcpu) && svm->nested.nested_run_pending)
+	if (is_guest_mode(vcpu) && vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending)
 		svm_set_nested_run_soft_int_state(vcpu);
 
 	/*
@@ -4547,11 +4547,11 @@ static __no_kcsan fastpath_t svm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 run_flags)
 		nested_sync_control_from_vmcb02(svm);
 
 		/* Track VMRUNs that have made past consistency checking */
-		if (svm->nested.nested_run_pending &&
+		if (vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending &&
 		    !svm_is_vmrun_failure(svm->vmcb->control.exit_code))
                         ++vcpu->stat.nested_run;
 
-		svm->nested.nested_run_pending = 0;
+		vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending = 0;
 	}
 
 	svm->vmcb->control.tlb_ctl = TLB_CONTROL_DO_NOTHING;
@@ -4920,7 +4920,7 @@ bool svm_smi_blocked(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 static int svm_smi_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool for_injection)
 {
 	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
-	if (svm->nested.nested_run_pending)
+	if (vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending)
 		return -EBUSY;
 
 	if (svm_smi_blocked(vcpu))
@@ -5035,7 +5035,7 @@ static int svm_leave_smm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const union kvm_smram *smram)
 	if (ret)
 		goto unmap_save;
 
-	svm->nested.nested_run_pending = 1;
+	vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending = 1;
 
 unmap_save:
 	kvm_vcpu_unmap(vcpu, &map_save);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
index 9909bb7d2d31..1c98419be9d2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
@@ -215,10 +215,6 @@ struct svm_nested_state {
 	 */
 	void *msrpm;
 
-	/* A VMRUN has started but has not yet been performed, so
-	 * we cannot inject a nested vmexit yet.  */
-	bool nested_run_pending;
-
 	/* cache for control fields of the guest */
 	struct vmcb_ctrl_area_cached ctl;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
index 101588914cbb..65e45cee871c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -2273,7 +2273,7 @@ static void vmx_start_preemption_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 
 static u64 nested_vmx_calc_efer(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
 {
-	if (vmx->nested.nested_run_pending &&
+	if (vmx->vcpu.arch.nested_run_pending &&
 	    (vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_EFER))
 		return vmcs12->guest_ia32_efer;
 	else if (vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_IA32E_MODE)
@@ -2513,7 +2513,7 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_early(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct loaded_vmcs *vmcs0
 	/*
 	 * Interrupt/Exception Fields
 	 */
-	if (vmx->nested.nested_run_pending) {
+	if (vmx->vcpu.arch.nested_run_pending) {
 		vmcs_write32(VM_ENTRY_INTR_INFO_FIELD,
 			     vmcs12->vm_entry_intr_info_field);
 		vmcs_write32(VM_ENTRY_EXCEPTION_ERROR_CODE,
@@ -2621,7 +2621,7 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_rare(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
 			vmcs_write64(GUEST_PDPTR3, vmcs12->guest_pdptr3);
 		}
 
-		if (kvm_mpx_supported() && vmx->nested.nested_run_pending &&
+		if (kvm_mpx_supported() && vmx->vcpu.arch.nested_run_pending &&
 		    (vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS))
 			vmcs_write64(GUEST_BNDCFGS, vmcs12->guest_bndcfgs);
 	}
@@ -2718,7 +2718,7 @@ static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
 			!(evmcs->hv_clean_fields & HV_VMX_ENLIGHTENED_CLEAN_FIELD_GUEST_GRP1);
 	}
 
-	if (vmx->nested.nested_run_pending &&
+	if (vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending &&
 	    (vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_DEBUG_CONTROLS)) {
 		kvm_set_dr(vcpu, 7, vmcs12->guest_dr7);
 		vmx_guest_debugctl_write(vcpu, vmcs12->guest_ia32_debugctl &
@@ -2728,13 +2728,13 @@ static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
 		vmx_guest_debugctl_write(vcpu, vmx->nested.pre_vmenter_debugctl);
 	}
 
-	if (!vmx->nested.nested_run_pending ||
+	if (!vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending ||
 	    !(vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_CET_STATE))
 		vmcs_write_cet_state(vcpu, vmx->nested.pre_vmenter_s_cet,
 				     vmx->nested.pre_vmenter_ssp,
 				     vmx->nested.pre_vmenter_ssp_tbl);
 
-	if (kvm_mpx_supported() && (!vmx->nested.nested_run_pending ||
+	if (kvm_mpx_supported() && (!vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending ||
 	    !(vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS)))
 		vmcs_write64(GUEST_BNDCFGS, vmx->nested.pre_vmenter_bndcfgs);
 	vmx_set_rflags(vcpu, vmcs12->guest_rflags);
@@ -2747,7 +2747,7 @@ static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
 	vcpu->arch.cr0_guest_owned_bits &= ~vmcs12->cr0_guest_host_mask;
 	vmcs_writel(CR0_GUEST_HOST_MASK, ~vcpu->arch.cr0_guest_owned_bits);
 
-	if (vmx->nested.nested_run_pending &&
+	if (vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending &&
 	    (vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_PAT)) {
 		vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_PAT, vmcs12->guest_ia32_pat);
 		vcpu->arch.pat = vmcs12->guest_ia32_pat;
@@ -3349,7 +3349,7 @@ static int nested_vmx_check_guest_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	 *   to bit 8 (LME) if bit 31 in the CR0 field (corresponding to
 	 *   CR0.PG) is 1.
 	 */
-	if (to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.nested_run_pending &&
+	if (vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending &&
 	    (vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_EFER)) {
 		if (CC(!kvm_valid_efer(vcpu, vmcs12->guest_ia32_efer)) ||
 		    CC(ia32e != !!(vmcs12->guest_ia32_efer & EFER_LMA)) ||
@@ -3627,15 +3627,15 @@ enum nvmx_vmentry_status nested_vmx_enter_non_root_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 
 	kvm_service_local_tlb_flush_requests(vcpu);
 
-	if (!vmx->nested.nested_run_pending ||
+	if (!vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending ||
 	    !(vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_DEBUG_CONTROLS))
 		vmx->nested.pre_vmenter_debugctl = vmx_guest_debugctl_read();
 	if (kvm_mpx_supported() &&
-	    (!vmx->nested.nested_run_pending ||
+	    (!vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending ||
 	     !(vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS)))
 		vmx->nested.pre_vmenter_bndcfgs = vmcs_read64(GUEST_BNDCFGS);
 
-	if (!vmx->nested.nested_run_pending ||
+	if (!vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending ||
 	    !(vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_CET_STATE))
 		vmcs_read_cet_state(vcpu, &vmx->nested.pre_vmenter_s_cet,
 				    &vmx->nested.pre_vmenter_ssp,
@@ -3844,7 +3844,7 @@ static int nested_vmx_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool launch)
 	 * We're finally done with prerequisite checking, and can start with
 	 * the nested entry.
 	 */
-	vmx->nested.nested_run_pending = 1;
+	vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending = 1;
 	vmx->nested.has_preemption_timer_deadline = false;
 	status = nested_vmx_enter_non_root_mode(vcpu, true);
 	if (unlikely(status != NVMX_VMENTRY_SUCCESS))
@@ -3876,12 +3876,12 @@ static int nested_vmx_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool launch)
 		    !nested_cpu_has(vmcs12, CPU_BASED_NMI_WINDOW_EXITING) &&
 		    !(nested_cpu_has(vmcs12, CPU_BASED_INTR_WINDOW_EXITING) &&
 		      (vmcs12->guest_rflags & X86_EFLAGS_IF))) {
-			vmx->nested.nested_run_pending = 0;
+			vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending = 0;
 			return kvm_emulate_halt_noskip(vcpu);
 		}
 		break;
 	case GUEST_ACTIVITY_WAIT_SIPI:
-		vmx->nested.nested_run_pending = 0;
+		vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending = 0;
 		kvm_set_mp_state(vcpu, KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED);
 		break;
 	default:
@@ -3891,7 +3891,7 @@ static int nested_vmx_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool launch)
 	return 1;
 
 vmentry_failed:
-	vmx->nested.nested_run_pending = 0;
+	vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending = 0;
 	if (status == NVMX_VMENTRY_KVM_INTERNAL_ERROR)
 		return 0;
 	if (status == NVMX_VMENTRY_VMEXIT)
@@ -4288,7 +4288,7 @@ static int vmx_check_nested_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	 * previously injected event, the pending exception occurred while said
 	 * event was being delivered and thus needs to be handled.
 	 */
-	bool block_nested_exceptions = vmx->nested.nested_run_pending;
+	bool block_nested_exceptions = vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending;
 	/*
 	 * Events that don't require injection, i.e. that are virtualized by
 	 * hardware, aren't blocked by a pending VM-Enter as KVM doesn't need
@@ -4657,7 +4657,7 @@ static void sync_vmcs02_to_vmcs12(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
 
 	if (nested_cpu_has_preemption_timer(vmcs12) &&
 	    vmcs12->vm_exit_controls & VM_EXIT_SAVE_VMX_PREEMPTION_TIMER &&
-	    !vmx->nested.nested_run_pending)
+	    !vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending)
 		vmcs12->vmx_preemption_timer_value =
 			vmx_get_preemption_timer_value(vcpu);
 
@@ -5056,7 +5056,7 @@ void __nested_vmx_vmexit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 vm_exit_reason,
 	vmx->nested.mtf_pending = false;
 
 	/* trying to cancel vmlaunch/vmresume is a bug */
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(vmx->nested.nested_run_pending);
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_HYPERV
 	if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES, vcpu)) {
@@ -6679,7 +6679,7 @@ bool nested_vmx_reflect_vmexit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	unsigned long exit_qual;
 	u32 exit_intr_info;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(vmx->nested.nested_run_pending);
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending);
 
 	/*
 	 * Late nested VM-Fail shares the same flow as nested VM-Exit since KVM
@@ -6775,7 +6775,7 @@ static int vmx_get_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)) {
 			kvm_state.flags |= KVM_STATE_NESTED_GUEST_MODE;
 
-			if (vmx->nested.nested_run_pending)
+			if (vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending)
 				kvm_state.flags |= KVM_STATE_NESTED_RUN_PENDING;
 
 			if (vmx->nested.mtf_pending)
@@ -6850,7 +6850,7 @@ static int vmx_get_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 void vmx_leave_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)) {
-		to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.nested_run_pending = 0;
+		vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending = 0;
 		nested_vmx_vmexit(vcpu, -1, 0, 0);
 	}
 	free_nested(vcpu);
@@ -6987,7 +6987,7 @@ static int vmx_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	if (!(kvm_state->flags & KVM_STATE_NESTED_GUEST_MODE))
 		return 0;
 
-	vmx->nested.nested_run_pending =
+	vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending =
 		!!(kvm_state->flags & KVM_STATE_NESTED_RUN_PENDING);
 
 	vmx->nested.mtf_pending =
@@ -7039,7 +7039,7 @@ static int vmx_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return 0;
 
 error_guest_mode:
-	vmx->nested.nested_run_pending = 0;
+	vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending = 0;
 	return ret;
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 9302c16571cd..0e7e0a17bb75 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -5170,7 +5170,7 @@ bool vmx_nmi_blocked(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 int vmx_nmi_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool for_injection)
 {
-	if (to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.nested_run_pending)
+	if (vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending)
 		return -EBUSY;
 
 	/* An NMI must not be injected into L2 if it's supposed to VM-Exit.  */
@@ -5197,7 +5197,7 @@ bool vmx_interrupt_blocked(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 int vmx_interrupt_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool for_injection)
 {
-	if (to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.nested_run_pending)
+	if (vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending)
 		return -EBUSY;
 
 	/*
@@ -6009,7 +6009,7 @@ static bool vmx_unhandleable_emulation_required(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	 * only reachable if userspace modifies L2 guest state after KVM has
 	 * performed the nested VM-Enter consistency checks.
 	 */
-	if (vmx->nested.nested_run_pending)
+	if (vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending)
 		return true;
 
 	/*
@@ -6693,7 +6693,7 @@ static int __vmx_handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, fastpath_t exit_fastpath)
 	 * invalid guest state should never happen as that means KVM knowingly
 	 * allowed a nested VM-Enter with an invalid vmcs12.  More below.
 	 */
-	if (KVM_BUG_ON(vmx->nested.nested_run_pending, vcpu->kvm))
+	if (KVM_BUG_ON(vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending, vcpu->kvm))
 		return -EIO;
 
 	if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)) {
@@ -7621,11 +7621,11 @@ fastpath_t vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 run_flags)
 		 * Track VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME that have made past guest state
 		 * checking.
 		 */
-		if (vmx->nested.nested_run_pending &&
+		if (vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending &&
 		    !vmx_get_exit_reason(vcpu).failed_vmentry)
 			++vcpu->stat.nested_run;
 
-		vmx->nested.nested_run_pending = 0;
+		vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending = 0;
 	}
 
 	if (unlikely(vmx->fail))
@@ -8382,7 +8382,7 @@ void vmx_setup_mce(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 int vmx_smi_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool for_injection)
 {
 	/* we need a nested vmexit to enter SMM, postpone if run is pending */
-	if (to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.nested_run_pending)
+	if (vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending)
 		return -EBUSY;
 	return !is_smm(vcpu);
 }
@@ -8423,7 +8423,7 @@ int vmx_leave_smm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const union kvm_smram *smram)
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
-		vmx->nested.nested_run_pending = 1;
+		vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending = 1;
 		vmx->nested.smm.guest_mode = false;
 	}
 	return 0;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
index 70bfe81dea54..db84e8001da5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
@@ -138,9 +138,6 @@ struct nested_vmx {
 	 */
 	bool enlightened_vmcs_enabled;
 
-	/* L2 must run next, and mustn't decide to exit to L1. */
-	bool nested_run_pending;
-
 	/* Pending MTF VM-exit into L1.  */
 	bool mtf_pending;
 
-- 
2.53.0.473.g4a7958ca14-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-10 22:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-10 22:45 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: Syzkaller nested_run_pending defense Sean Christopherson
2026-03-10 22:45 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-03-10 22:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Suppress WARNs on nested_run_pending after userspace exit Sean Christopherson
2026-03-11  1:53   ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-11 13:27     ` Sean Christopherson
2026-03-11 18:23       ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-12 14:22         ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260310224546.2582118-2-seanjc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=yosry@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.