From: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
To: john.fastabend@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, sd@queasysnail.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/8] tls: Factor tls_strp_msg_release() from tls_strp_msg_done()
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 20:19:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260311001952.57059-5-cel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260311001952.57059-1-cel@kernel.org>
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
tls_strp_msg_done() conflates releasing the current record with
checking for the next one via tls_strp_check_rcv(). Batch
processing requires releasing a record without immediately
triggering that check, so the release step is separated into
tls_strp_msg_release(). tls_strp_msg_done() is preserved as a
wrapper for existing callers.
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
---
net/tls/tls.h | 1 +
net/tls/tls_strp.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls.h b/net/tls/tls.h
index e8f81a006520..a97f1acef31d 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls.h
+++ b/net/tls/tls.h
@@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ int tls_strp_init(struct tls_strparser *strp, struct sock *sk);
void tls_strp_data_ready(struct tls_strparser *strp);
void tls_strp_check_rcv(struct tls_strparser *strp);
+void tls_strp_msg_release(struct tls_strparser *strp);
void tls_strp_msg_done(struct tls_strparser *strp);
int tls_rx_msg_size(struct tls_strparser *strp, struct sk_buff *skb);
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_strp.c b/net/tls/tls_strp.c
index 98e12f0ff57e..a7648ebde162 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_strp.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_strp.c
@@ -581,7 +581,16 @@ static void tls_strp_work(struct work_struct *w)
release_sock(strp->sk);
}
-void tls_strp_msg_done(struct tls_strparser *strp)
+/**
+ * tls_strp_msg_release - release the current strparser message
+ * @strp: TLS stream parser instance
+ *
+ * Release the current record without triggering a check for the
+ * next record. Callers must invoke tls_strp_check_rcv() before
+ * releasing the socket lock, or queued data will stall until
+ * the next tls_strp_data_ready() event.
+ */
+void tls_strp_msg_release(struct tls_strparser *strp)
{
WARN_ON(!strp->stm.full_len);
@@ -592,7 +601,11 @@ void tls_strp_msg_done(struct tls_strparser *strp)
WRITE_ONCE(strp->msg_ready, 0);
memset(&strp->stm, 0, sizeof(strp->stm));
+}
+void tls_strp_msg_done(struct tls_strparser *strp)
+{
+ tls_strp_msg_release(strp);
tls_strp_check_rcv(strp);
}
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-11 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-11 0:19 [PATCH v2 0/8] TLS read_sock performance scalability Chuck Lever
2026-03-11 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] tls: Factor tls_decrypt_async_drain() from recvmsg Chuck Lever
2026-03-11 17:24 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-03-11 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] tls: Factor tls_rx_decrypt_record() helper Chuck Lever
2026-03-11 17:25 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-03-11 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] tls: Fix dangling skb pointer in tls_sw_read_sock() Chuck Lever
2026-03-11 0:19 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2026-03-11 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] tls: Suppress spurious saved_data_ready on all receive paths Chuck Lever
2026-03-11 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] tls: Flush backlog before tls_rx_rec_wait in read_sock Chuck Lever
2026-03-11 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] tls: Restructure tls_sw_read_sock() into submit/deliver phases Chuck Lever
2026-03-11 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] tls: Enable batch async decryption in read_sock Chuck Lever
2026-03-11 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] TLS read_sock performance scalability Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260311001952.57059-5-cel@kernel.org \
--to=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.