From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
"open list:QUALCOMM TYPEC PORT MANAGER DRIVER"
<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL HARDENING (not covered by other
areas):Keyword:b__counted_by(_le|_be)?b"
<linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: typec: qcom-pmic-typec: simplify allocation
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 06:04:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026031252-slather-upscale-636e@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKxU2N_dJY60Tp4UgLMZ97ZJywNEktmA1At3z6VOPhhSCRx-1w@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 11:54:55AM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 7:47 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 02:21:48PM -0800, Rosen Penev wrote:
> > > Change kzalloc + kcalloc to just kzalloc with a flexible array member.
> > >
> > > Add __counted_by for extra runtime analysis when requested.
> > >
> > > Shuffle some code in probe to provide a clearer picture.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > .../typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec_pdphy.c | 27 ++++++++-----------
> > > .../typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec_port.c | 26 ++++++++----------
> > > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec_pdphy.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec_pdphy.c
> > > index c8b1463e6e8b..4b3915c6894a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec_pdphy.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec_pdphy.c
> > > @@ -95,13 +95,13 @@ struct pmic_typec_pdphy {
> > > struct regmap *regmap;
> > > u32 base;
> > >
> > > - unsigned int nr_irqs;
> > > - struct pmic_typec_pdphy_irq_data *irq_data;
> > > -
> > > struct work_struct reset_work;
> > > struct work_struct receive_work;
> > > struct regulator *vdd_pdphy;
> > > spinlock_t lock; /* Register atomicity */
> > > +
> > > + unsigned int nr_irqs;
> > > + struct pmic_typec_pdphy_irq_data irq_data[] __counted_by(nr_irqs);
> > > };
> > >
> > > static void qcom_pmic_typec_pdphy_reset_on(struct pmic_typec_pdphy *pmic_typec_pdphy)
> > > @@ -560,31 +560,26 @@ int qcom_pmic_typec_pdphy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > > struct pmic_typec_pdphy_irq_data *irq_data;
> > > int i, ret, irq;
> > >
> > > - pmic_typec_pdphy = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pmic_typec_pdphy), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > - if (!pmic_typec_pdphy)
> > > - return -ENOMEM;
> > > -
> > > if (!res->nr_irqs || res->nr_irqs > PMIC_PDPHY_MAX_IRQS)
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > - irq_data = devm_kcalloc(dev, res->nr_irqs, sizeof(*irq_data),
> > > - GFP_KERNEL);
> > > - if (!irq_data)
> > > + pmic_typec_pdphy = devm_kzalloc(dev, struct_size(pmic_typec_pdphy, irq_data, res->nr_irqs), GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > extra long line, checkpatch.pl didn't complain about this?
> >
> > > + if (!pmic_typec_pdphy)
> > > return -ENOMEM;
> > >
> > > + pmic_typec_pdphy->nr_irqs = res->nr_irqs;
> > > + pmic_typec_pdphy->dev = dev;
> > > + pmic_typec_pdphy->base = base;
> > > + pmic_typec_pdphy->regmap = regmap;
> > > pmic_typec_pdphy->vdd_pdphy = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vdd-pdphy");
> > > if (IS_ERR(pmic_typec_pdphy->vdd_pdphy))
> > > return PTR_ERR(pmic_typec_pdphy->vdd_pdphy);
> > >
> > > - pmic_typec_pdphy->dev = dev;
> > > - pmic_typec_pdphy->base = base;
> > > - pmic_typec_pdphy->regmap = regmap;
> > > - pmic_typec_pdphy->nr_irqs = res->nr_irqs;
> > > - pmic_typec_pdphy->irq_data = irq_data;
> > > spin_lock_init(&pmic_typec_pdphy->lock);
> > > INIT_WORK(&pmic_typec_pdphy->reset_work, qcom_pmic_typec_pdphy_sig_reset_work);
> > >
> > > - for (i = 0; i < res->nr_irqs; i++, irq_data++) {
> > > + for (i = 0; i < res->nr_irqs; i++) {
> > > + irq_data = &pmic_typec_pdphy->irq_data[i];
> > > irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, res->irq_params[i].irq_name);
> > > if (irq < 0)
> > > return irq;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec_port.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec_port.c
> > > index 8051eaa46991..7c5cf8061f04 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec_port.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec_port.c
> >
> > Can you just convert one driver at a time please? This should be a
> > patch series.
> This is not the same driver?
It's two different files, with two different structure allocations, so I
assumed it was two different ones. Either way, it should be two
different patches :)
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-12 5:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-06 22:21 [PATCH] usb: typec: qcom-pmic-typec: simplify allocation Rosen Penev
2026-03-07 7:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-03-07 7:54 ` Rosen Penev
2026-03-11 14:47 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-03-11 18:54 ` Rosen Penev
2026-03-12 5:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026031252-slather-upscale-636e@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.