From: Kevin Lampis <kevin.lampis@citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: jbeulich@suse.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
roger.pau@citrix.com, Kevin Lampis <kevin.lampis@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH v v3 4/7] x86: Remove Intel 0x65, 0x6e, 0x5d from VMX code
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 16:36:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260313163630.1073019-5-kevin.lampis@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260313163630.1073019-1-kevin.lampis@citrix.com>
These Intel models were used in telecoms and not regarded as
general purpose processors.
- 0x5d (SoFIA 3G Granite/ES2.1)
- 0x65 (SoFIA LTE AOSP)
- 0x6e (Cougar Mountain)
Model 06_5DH does appear in the Intel Software Developers Manuals but
Linux has declined to take these models into intel-family.h because
they're not general purpose.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Lampis <kevin.lampis@citrix.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- New patch based on review comments
Changes in v3:
- Expanded the commit message
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 82c55f49ae..e45060d403 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static const struct lbr_info *__init get_model_specific_lbr(void)
case 0x1c: case 0x26: case 0x27: case 0x35: case 0x36:
return at_lbr;
/* Silvermont */
- case 0x37: case 0x4a: case 0x4d: case 0x5a: case 0x5d:
+ case 0x37: case 0x4a: case 0x4d: case 0x5a:
/* Airmont */
case 0x4c:
return sm_lbr;
@@ -3126,10 +3126,7 @@ static bool __init has_if_pschange_mc(void)
case 0x4a: /* Merrifield */
case 0x5a: /* Moorefield */
case 0x5c: /* Goldmont */
- case 0x5d: /* SoFIA 3G Granite/ES2.1 */
- case 0x65: /* SoFIA LTE AOSP */
case 0x5f: /* Denverton */
- case 0x6e: /* Cougar Mountain */
case 0x75: /* Lightning Mountain */
case 0x7a: /* Gemini Lake */
case 0x86: /* Jacobsville */
--
2.51.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-13 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-13 16:36 [PATCH v v3 0/7] Remove x86 prefixed names from cpuinfo Kevin Lampis
2026-03-13 16:36 ` [PATCH v v3 1/7] x86: relax some CPU checks for non-64 bit CPUs Kevin Lampis
2026-03-23 9:54 ` Jan Beulich
2026-03-13 16:36 ` [PATCH v v3 2/7] x86: Remove x86 prefixed names from mcheck code Kevin Lampis
2026-03-23 9:59 ` Jan Beulich
2026-03-13 16:36 ` [PATCH v v3 3/7] x86: Remove x86 prefixed names from acpi code Kevin Lampis
2026-03-23 10:02 ` Jan Beulich
2026-03-13 16:36 ` Kevin Lampis [this message]
2026-03-13 16:36 ` [PATCH v v3 5/7] x86: Remove x86 prefixed names from hvm code Kevin Lampis
2026-03-23 10:06 ` Jan Beulich
2026-03-13 16:36 ` [PATCH v v3 6/7] x86: Remove x86 prefixed names from x86/cpu/ files Kevin Lampis
2026-03-19 9:24 ` Jan Beulich
2026-03-19 11:34 ` Kevin Lampis
2026-03-19 13:51 ` Jan Beulich
2026-03-13 16:36 ` [PATCH v v3 7/7] x86: Remove x86 prefixed names from cpuinfo Kevin Lampis
2026-03-23 10:03 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260313163630.1073019-5-kevin.lampis@citrix.com \
--to=kevin.lampis@citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.