All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,objecting@objecting.org,mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,dennis@kernel.org,devnexen@gmail.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + lib-introduce-hierarchical-per-cpu-counters-fix.patch added to mm-unstable branch
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2026 14:45:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260314214515.ED89AC116C6@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3473 bytes --]


The patch titled
     Subject: lib: fix compare_delta parameter order in percpu_counter_tree
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     lib-introduce-hierarchical-per-cpu-counters-fix.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/lib-introduce-hierarchical-per-cpu-counters-fix.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via various
branches at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there most days

------------------------------------------------------
From: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Subject: lib: fix compare_delta parameter order in percpu_counter_tree
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 17:54:24 +0000

The compare_delta() helper takes (delta, accuracy_neg, accuracy_pos), but
every call site passes (delta, accuracy_pos, accuracy_neg) — the last
two arguments are consistently swapped.

The documented invariant (include/linux/percpu_counter_tree.h) is:

  (precise_sum - under) <= approx_sum <= (precise_sum + over)

Which means precise_sum is in [approx_sum - over, approx_sum + under].

For a positive delta (v - approx_sum >= 0), accuracy_pos must be
"under" (the maximum amount precise_sum can exceed approx_sum).
For a negative delta, accuracy_neg must be "over". Since under > over
always (batch_size * M vs (batch_size - 1) * M), swapping them causes
false definitive results: the functions return 1 ("v > counter") when
the correct answer is 0 (indeterminate).

This affects all comparison functions:
- percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value()
- percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare()
- percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value()
- percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare()

The precise variants are also affected because their approximate
fast-path can short-circuit with a wrong result, skipping the precise
sum computation.

Fix by swapping the parameter order in compare_delta() itself, since all
call sites are consistently swapped.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20260313175424.132735-1-devnexen@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Law <objecting@objecting.org>
Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 lib/percpu_counter_tree.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/lib/percpu_counter_tree.c~lib-introduce-hierarchical-per-cpu-counters-fix
+++ a/lib/percpu_counter_tree.c
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ long percpu_counter_tree_precise_sum(str
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_counter_tree_precise_sum);
 
 static
-int compare_delta(long delta, unsigned long accuracy_neg, unsigned long accuracy_pos)
+int compare_delta(long delta, unsigned long accuracy_pos, unsigned long accuracy_neg)
 {
 	if (delta >= 0) {
 		if (delta <= accuracy_pos)
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from devnexen@gmail.com are

lib-introduce-hierarchical-per-cpu-counters-fix.patch


                 reply	other threads:[~2026-03-14 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260314214515.ED89AC116C6@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=devnexen@gmail.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=objecting@objecting.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.