From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 04/12] drm/xe: Issue GGTT invalidation under lock in ggtt_node_remove
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 21:32:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260316043255.226352-5-matthew.brost@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260316043255.226352-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>
Async work (e.g., GuC queue teardowns) can call ggtt_node_remove, so the
operation must be performed under the GGTT lock to ensure the GGTT
online check remains stable. GGTT insertion and removal are heavyweight
operations (e.g., queue create/destroy), so the additional serialization
cost is negligible compared to ensuring correctness.
Fixes: 4f3a998a173b ("drm/xe: Open-code GGTT MMIO access protection")
Signed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c | 9 ++-------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
index 017f679ba13f..353b324f7301 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
@@ -482,15 +482,10 @@ static void ggtt_node_remove(struct xe_ggtt_node *node)
xe_ggtt_clear(ggtt, xe_ggtt_node_addr(node), xe_ggtt_node_size(node));
drm_mm_remove_node(&node->base);
node->base.size = 0;
- mutex_unlock(&ggtt->lock);
-
- if (!bound)
- goto free_node;
-
- if (node->invalidate_on_remove)
+ if (bound && node->invalidate_on_remove)
xe_ggtt_invalidate(ggtt);
+ mutex_unlock(&ggtt->lock);
-free_node:
ggtt_node_fini(node);
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-16 4:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-16 4:32 [RFC PATCH 00/12] Introduce DRM dep queue Matthew Brost
2026-03-16 4:32 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] workqueue: Add interface to teach lockdep to warn on reclaim violations Matthew Brost
2026-03-25 15:59 ` Tejun Heo
2026-03-26 1:49 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-26 2:19 ` Tejun Heo
2026-03-27 4:33 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-27 17:25 ` Tejun Heo
2026-03-16 4:32 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] drm/dep: Add DRM dependency queue layer Matthew Brost
2026-03-16 9:16 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-17 5:22 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-17 8:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-16 10:25 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-03-17 5:10 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-17 12:19 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-03-18 23:02 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-17 2:47 ` Daniel Almeida
2026-03-17 5:45 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-17 7:17 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-03-17 8:26 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-17 12:04 ` Daniel Almeida
2026-03-17 19:41 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-03-23 17:31 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-23 17:42 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-03-17 18:14 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-17 19:48 ` Daniel Almeida
2026-03-17 20:43 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-18 22:40 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-19 9:57 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-22 6:43 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-23 7:58 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-23 10:06 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-23 17:11 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-17 12:31 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-03-17 14:25 ` Daniel Almeida
2026-03-17 14:33 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-03-18 22:50 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-17 8:47 ` Christian König
2026-03-17 14:55 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-18 23:28 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-19 9:11 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-23 4:50 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-23 9:55 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-23 17:08 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-23 18:38 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-24 9:23 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-24 16:06 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-25 2:33 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-24 8:49 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-24 16:51 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-17 16:30 ` Shashank Sharma
2026-03-16 4:32 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] drm/xe: Use WQ_MEM_WARN_ON_RECLAIM on all workqueues in the reclaim path Matthew Brost
2026-03-16 4:32 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-03-26 5:45 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] drm/xe: Issue GGTT invalidation under lock in ggtt_node_remove Bhadane, Dnyaneshwar
2026-03-16 4:32 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] drm/xe: Return fence from xe_sched_job_arm and adjust job references Matthew Brost
2026-03-16 4:32 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] drm/xe: Convert to DRM dep queue scheduler layer Matthew Brost
2026-03-16 4:32 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] drm/xe: Make scheduler message lock IRQ-safe Matthew Brost
2026-03-16 4:32 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] drm/xe: Rework exec queue object on top of DRM dep Matthew Brost
2026-03-16 4:32 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] drm/xe: Enable IRQ job put in " Matthew Brost
2026-03-16 4:32 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] drm/xe: Use DRM dep queue kill semantics Matthew Brost
2026-03-16 4:32 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] accel/amdxdna: Convert to drm_dep scheduler layer Matthew Brost
2026-03-16 4:32 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] drm/panthor: " Matthew Brost
2026-03-16 4:52 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce DRM dep queue Patchwork
2026-03-16 4:53 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-03-16 5:28 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-03-16 8:09 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260316043255.226352-5-matthew.brost@intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.