From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Di Zhu <zhud@hygon.cn>
Cc: jasowang@redhat.com, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com,
eperezma@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
willemb@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, lijing@hygon.cn,
yingzhiwei@hygon.cn, Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com>,
Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] virtio-net: enable NETIF_F_GRO_HW only if GRO-related offloads are supported
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:04:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260317074739-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260317113433.927022-1-zhud@hygon.cn>
On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 07:34:33PM +0800, Di Zhu wrote:
> Negotiating VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS indicates the device
> allows control over offload support, but the offloads that can be
> controlled may have nothing to do with GRO (e.g., if neither GUEST_TSO4
> nor GUEST_TSO6 is supported).
>
> In such a setup, reporting NETIF_F_GRO_HW as available for the device
> is too optimistic and misleading to the user.
>
> Improve the situation by masking off NETIF_F_GRO_HW unless the device
> possesses actual GRO-related offload capabilities. Out of an abundance
> of caution, this does not change the current behaviour for hardware with
> just v6 or just v4 GRO: current interfaces do not allow distinguishing
> between v6/v4 GRO, so we can't expose them to userspace precisely.
>
> Fixes: dbcf24d15388 ("virtio-net: use NETIF_F_GRO_HW instead of NETIF_F_LRO")
> Signed-off-by: Di Zhu <zhud@hygon.cn>
> ---
> /* v3 */
> -Update Fixes tag to dbcf24d15388
> -Refine commit message using Maintainer's "too optimistic"
> phrasing to clarify the risk of misleading configurations.
>
> /* v2 */
> -make the modified logic clearer
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 72d6a9c6a5a2..b233c99925e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -6781,8 +6781,6 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) ||
> virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6))
> dev->features |= NETIF_F_GRO_HW;
> - if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS))
> - dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_GRO_HW;
>
> dev->vlan_features = dev->features;
> dev->xdp_features = NETDEV_XDP_ACT_BASIC | NETDEV_XDP_ACT_REDIRECT |
> @@ -7058,6 +7056,10 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> }
> vi->guest_offloads_capable = vi->guest_offloads;
>
> + if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS) &&
> + (vi->guest_offloads_capable & GUEST_OFFLOAD_GRO_HW_MASK))
> + dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_GRO_HW;
> +
Hmm wait a second. Isn't this late? netdev registered, even link is
up already.
Documentation/networking/netdev-features.rst says:
1. netdev->hw_features set contains features whose state may possibly
be changed (enabled or disabled) for a particular device by user's
request. This set should be initialized in ndo_init callback and not
changed later.
I'd say let's move it up?
Having said that, we already have a bug:
dev->hw_features &= ~NETIF_F_RXHASH;
is after register, too.
This is because we take pains to recover from these commands failing.
Except, we completely ignore that in virtnet_set_rxfh ...
Cc relevant contributors to maybe take a look at fixing all that.
> rtnl_unlock();
>
> err = virtnet_cpu_notif_add(vi);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-17 11:34 [PATCH net v3] virtio-net: enable NETIF_F_GRO_HW only if GRO-related offloads are supported Di Zhu
2026-03-17 12:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2026-03-17 12:41 ` Zhud
2026-03-17 22:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-19 0:43 ` Zhud
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260317074739-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lijing@hygon.cn \
--cc=lulie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yingzhiwei@hygon.cn \
--cc=zhud@hygon.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.