From: Sean Chang <seanwascoding@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sean Chang <seanwascoding@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] sunrpc: Fix dprintk type mismatch using do-while(0)
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 02:09:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260320180955.150696-2-seanwascoding@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260320180955.150696-1-seanwascoding@gmail.com>
Following David Laight's suggestion, simplify the macro definitions by removing
the unnecessary 'fmt' argument and using no_printk(VA_ARGS) directly.
To resolve a Sparse warning (void vs int mismatch) when dfprintk is used in
conditional statements, wrap the non-debug definition in a do-while(0) block.
This ensures the macro always evaluates to a void expression.
Suggested-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Chang <seanwascoding@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h
index ab61bed2f7af..f6f2a106eeaf 100644
--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h
@@ -38,8 +38,6 @@ extern unsigned int nlm_debug;
do { \
ifdebug(fac) \
__sunrpc_printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
- else \
- no_printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
} while (0)
# define dfprintk_rcu(fac, fmt, ...) \
@@ -48,15 +46,13 @@ do { \
rcu_read_lock(); \
__sunrpc_printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
rcu_read_unlock(); \
- } else { \
- no_printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
} \
} while (0)
#else
# define ifdebug(fac) if (0)
-# define dfprintk(fac, fmt, ...) no_printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
-# define dfprintk_rcu(fac, fmt, ...) no_printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+# define dfprintk(fac, ...) no_printk(__VA_ARGS__)
+# define dfprintk_rcu(fac, ...) no_printk(__VA_ARGS__)
#endif
/*
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-20 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-20 18:09 [PATCH v4 0/5] sunrpc/nfs: cleanup redundant debug checks and refactor macros Sean Chang
2026-03-20 18:09 ` Sean Chang [this message]
2026-03-20 18:09 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] nfsd/lockd: Remove redundant debug checks Sean Chang
2026-03-20 18:09 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] svcrdma: remove redundant IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SUNRPC_DEBUG) guards Sean Chang
2026-03-20 18:09 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] nfs: refactor nfs_errorf macros and remove unused ones Sean Chang
2026-03-20 19:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-03-20 18:09 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] nfsd: remove obsolete __maybe_unused from variables Sean Chang
2026-03-20 19:17 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260320180955.150696-2-seanwascoding@gmail.com \
--to=seanwascoding@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.