From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] driver core: Don't link the device to the bus until we're ready to probe
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 06:41:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026032152-getting-carmaker-29d5@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260320200656.RFC.1.Id750b0fbcc94f23ed04b7aecabcead688d0d8c17@changeid>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 08:06:58PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> The moment we link a "struct device" into the list of devices for the
> bus, it's possible probe can happen. This is because another thread
> can load the driver at any time and that can cause the device to
> probe. This has been seen in practice with a stack crawl that looks
> like this [1]:
>
> really_probe()
> __driver_probe_device()
> driver_probe_device()
> __driver_attach()
> bus_for_each_dev()
> driver_attach()
> bus_add_driver()
> driver_register()
> __platform_driver_register()
> init_module() [some module]
> do_one_initcall()
> do_init_module()
> load_module()
> __arm64_sys_finit_module()
> invoke_syscall()
Are you sure this isn't just a platform bus issue? A bus should NOT be
allowing a driver to be added at the same time a device is being added
for that bus, ideally there should be a bus-specific lock somewhere for
this.
When a device is added to the bus, yes, a probe can happen, and is
expected to happen, for that device, so this feels odd.
that being said, your patch does seem sane, and I don't see anything
obviously wrong with it. But it feels odd that this is just now showing
up for something that has been this way for a few decades...
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-21 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-21 3:06 [RFC PATCH] driver core: Don't link the device to the bus until we're ready to probe Douglas Anderson
2026-03-21 5:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2026-03-21 7:35 ` Doug Anderson
2026-03-21 7:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-03-21 8:05 ` Doug Anderson
2026-03-21 15:54 ` Alan Stern
2026-03-23 17:07 ` Doug Anderson
2026-03-23 17:47 ` Alan Stern
2026-03-23 22:24 ` Doug Anderson
2026-03-24 15:21 ` Alan Stern
2026-03-26 21:49 ` Doug Anderson
2026-03-27 18:46 ` Alan Stern
2026-03-27 19:30 ` Doug Anderson
2026-03-28 1:35 ` Alan Stern
2026-03-30 14:31 ` Doug Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026032152-getting-carmaker-29d5@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.