From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>, Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: Change gfp_t to unsigned long
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2026 14:25:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202603221419.9kAfrwc5-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260319-gfp64-v1-5-2c73b8d42b7f@google.com>
Hi Brendan,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on 8a30aeb0d1b4e4aaf7f7bae72f20f2ae75385ccb]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Brendan-Jackman/drm-managed-Use-special-gfp_t-format-specifier/20260322-145930
base: 8a30aeb0d1b4e4aaf7f7bae72f20f2ae75385ccb
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260319-gfp64-v1-5-2c73b8d42b7f%40google.com
patch subject: [PATCH 5/5] mm: Change gfp_t to unsigned long
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-kunit (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260322/202603221419.9kAfrwc5-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260322/202603221419.9kAfrwc5-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603221419.9kAfrwc5-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from include/linux/module.h:23,
from lib/test_lockup.c:8:
>> lib/test_lockup.c:133:47: error: expected ';' before 'long'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:175:23: note: in definition of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe'
175 | param_check_##type(name, &(value)); \
| ^~~~
lib/test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/moduleparam.h:175:32: error: expected ')' before ',' token
175 | param_check_##type(name, &(value)); \
| ^
include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe'
149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lib/test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:39: error: 'param_ops_unsigned' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'param_ops_uint'?
176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:305:46: note: in definition of macro '__module_param_call'
305 | = { __param_str_##name, THIS_MODULE, ops, \
| ^~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_cb_unsafe'
176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe'
149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lib/test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lib/test_lockup.c:133:47: error: expected '}' before 'long'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:305:46: note: in definition of macro '__module_param_call'
305 | = { __param_str_##name, THIS_MODULE, ops, \
| ^~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_cb_unsafe'
176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe'
149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lib/test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:305:11: note: to match this '{'
305 | = { __param_str_##name, THIS_MODULE, ops, \
| ^
include/linux/moduleparam.h:192:9: note: in expansion of macro '__module_param_call'
192 | __module_param_call(MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX, name, ops, arg, perm, -1, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_cb_unsafe'
176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe'
149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lib/test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from include/linux/module.h:23,
from test_lockup.c:8:
test_lockup.c:133:47: error: expected ';' before 'long'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:175:23: note: in definition of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe'
175 | param_check_##type(name, &(value)); \
| ^~~~
test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/moduleparam.h:175:32: error: expected ')' before ',' token
175 | param_check_##type(name, &(value)); \
| ^
include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe'
149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:39: error: 'param_ops_unsigned' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'param_ops_uint'?
176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:305:46: note: in definition of macro '__module_param_call'
305 | = { __param_str_##name, THIS_MODULE, ops, \
| ^~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_cb_unsafe'
176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe'
149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test_lockup.c:133:47: error: expected '}' before 'long'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:305:46: note: in definition of macro '__module_param_call'
305 | = { __param_str_##name, THIS_MODULE, ops, \
| ^~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_cb_unsafe'
176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe'
149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:305:11: note: to match this '{'
305 | = { __param_str_##name, THIS_MODULE, ops, \
| ^
include/linux/moduleparam.h:192:9: note: in expansion of macro '__module_param_call'
192 | __module_param_call(MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX, name, ops, arg, perm, -1, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:176:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_cb_unsafe'
176 | module_param_cb_unsafe(name, ¶m_ops_##type, &value, perm); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/moduleparam.h:149:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_named_unsafe'
149 | module_param_named_unsafe(name, name, type, perm)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test_lockup.c:133:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_param_unsafe'
133 | module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +133 lib/test_lockup.c
131
132 static gfp_t alloc_pages_gfp = GFP_KERNEL;
> 133 module_param_unsafe(alloc_pages_gfp, unsigned long, 0400);
134 MODULE_PARM_DESC(alloc_pages_gfp, "allocate pages with this gfp_mask, default GFP_KERNEL");
135
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-22 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-19 16:03 [PATCH 0/5] mm: Switch gfp_t to unsigned long Brendan Jackman
2026-03-19 16:03 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/managed: Use special gfp_t format specifier Brendan Jackman
2026-03-19 16:03 ` [PATCH 2/5] iwlegacy: 3945-mac: " Brendan Jackman
2026-03-19 16:03 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm/kfence: " Brendan Jackman
2026-03-19 16:03 ` [PATCH 4/5] net/rds: " Brendan Jackman
2026-03-19 16:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm: Change gfp_t to unsigned long Brendan Jackman
2026-03-22 13:25 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2026-03-22 15:39 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-22 18:47 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-19 16:56 ` [PATCH 0/5] mm: Switch " Matthew Wilcox
2026-03-19 18:40 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-03-19 21:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-03-20 9:48 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-03-20 10:02 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-03-20 13:22 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-03-19 17:03 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-03-19 17:38 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-03-19 19:58 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-03-20 9:56 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-03-19 18:30 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-20 9:37 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-03-20 16:26 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202603221419.9kAfrwc5-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.