From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
Cc: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Lorenz Bauer <lmb@isovalent.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] selftests/bpf: Initialize operation name before use
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 06:58:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260324065820.GC43072@e132581.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31243215-918a-4f03-917b-de869b7b7bf1@linux.dev>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 03:52:38PM -0700, Ihor Solodrai wrote:
> On 3/23/26 8:40 AM, Leo Yan wrote:
> > ASAN reports stack-buffer-overflow due to the uninitialized op_name.
> >
> > Initialize it to fix the issue.
> >
> > Fixes: 054b6c7866c7 ("selftests/bpf: Add verifier log tests for BPF_BTF_LOAD command")
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier_log.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier_log.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier_log.c
> > index aaa2854974c0a91cbbb9fc13ae0f966de1bcc818..dcbe2ef995c5b211c2b86b9555c02144e11ee7d6 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier_log.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier_log.c
> > @@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ static void verif_btf_log_subtest(bool bad_btf)
> > res = load_btf(&opts, true);
> > ASSERT_EQ(res, -ENOSPC, "half_log_fd");
> > ASSERT_EQ(strlen(logs.buf), 24, "log_fixed_25");
> > + snprintf(op_name, sizeof(op_name), "log_fixed");
>
> You should use strscpy() here.
Sure, I will change to :
strscpy(op_name, "log_fixed", sizeof(op_name));
> This patch looks very unrelated.
> Did this surface only after the changes in the makefiles?
Yes. This change fixes ASAN error reported by BPF CI:
https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/23239705647/job/67554431963
Thanks,
Leo
> > ASSERT_STRNEQ(logs.buf, logs.reference, 24, op_name);
> >
> > /* validate rolling verifier log logic: try all variations of log buf
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-23 15:40 [PATCH 0/6] tools build: bpf: Append EXTRA_CFLAGS and HOST_EXTRACFLAGS Leo Yan
2026-03-23 15:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] bpftool: Avoid adding EXTRA_CFLAGS to HOST_CFLAGS Leo Yan
2026-03-31 8:46 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-23 15:40 ` [PATCH 2/6] bpftool: Append extra host flags Leo Yan
2026-03-23 15:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] libbpf: Initialize CFLAGS before including Makefile.include Leo Yan
2026-03-23 22:50 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-03-23 15:40 ` [PATCH 4/6] tools/bpf: build: Append extra cflags Leo Yan
2026-03-23 15:40 ` [PATCH 5/6] selftests/bpf: Initialize operation name before use Leo Yan
2026-03-23 22:52 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-03-24 6:58 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2026-03-24 15:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-03-23 15:40 ` [PATCH 6/6] selftests/bpf: Append extra cflags Leo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260324065820.GC43072@e132581.arm.com \
--to=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lmb@isovalent.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=qmo@kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.