From: luka.gejak@linux.dev
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: horms@kernel.org, fmaurer@redhat.com, liuhangbin@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v1 4/7] net: hsr: use __func__ instead of hardcoded function name
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 15:46:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260324144630.189094-5-luka.gejak@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260324144630.189094-1-luka.gejak@linux.dev>
From: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
Replace the hardcoded string "hsr_get_untagged_frame" with the
standard __func__ macro in netdev_warn_once() call to make the code
more robust to refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
---
net/hsr/hsr_forward.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c b/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c
index aefc9b6936ba..0aca859c88cb 100644
--- a/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c
+++ b/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ struct sk_buff *hsr_get_untagged_frame(struct hsr_frame_info *frame,
create_stripped_skb_hsr(frame->skb_hsr, frame);
else
netdev_warn_once(port->dev,
- "Unexpected frame received in hsr_get_untagged_frame()\n");
+ "Unexpected frame received in %s()\n", __func__);
if (!frame->skb_std)
return NULL;
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-24 14:46 [PATCH net-next v1 0/7] net: hsr: subsystem cleanups and modernization luka.gejak
2026-03-24 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next v1 1/7] net: hsr: constify hsr_ops and prp_ops protocol operation structures luka.gejak
2026-03-24 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next v1 2/7] net: hsr: replace fallthrough comments with fallthrough macro luka.gejak
2026-03-26 13:34 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-26 16:25 ` Felix Maurer
2026-03-26 21:31 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-26 22:16 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-24 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next v1 3/7] net: hsr: remove unnecessary void function return statement luka.gejak
2026-03-24 14:46 ` luka.gejak [this message]
2026-03-24 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next v1 5/7] net: hsr: remove unnecessary braces for single statement block luka.gejak
2026-03-24 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next v1 6/7] net: hsr: add missing blank lines after function declarations luka.gejak
2026-03-24 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next v1 7/7] net: hsr: use BIT() macro for bit shift constant luka.gejak
2026-03-26 16:26 ` Felix Maurer
2026-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH net-next v1 0/7] net: hsr: subsystem cleanups and modernization Felix Maurer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260324144630.189094-5-luka.gejak@linux.dev \
--to=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fmaurer@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.