From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7746C407100 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 17:15:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774372514; cv=none; b=dX4Kt+HRb572vyhiq+RwWoJSbqjkOUOIbyi8mk2eX7/lKqJfUpEGHvvaZn2sq1IAI/xiszUSFAnINumGRzLrkZuxilk4JOvOr2qBhHm0AarKK4VfKSxmFoI1nZWBga0qUQo6s7xSpYFRxLw/HOKWqHmkWb55Ja66KgYqSZYQqrE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774372514; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Bee7ELSW+8Ka2JJv4DOWB536cqm7x972M6vqivJh9ss=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=RpZQjv4JVxUa2VCHFfsD6IWNiqMqRI98jstXqvcwFcTw1O/1/JtdpxMGt5UrU/tJ/piCnKiTW9eGXqfSzRI/o6xeKNqDA/KpMzyn0Z+LuYYTtQ+VkX3zeTwVolXOCgtZ7qECIifMstSBON18vjaHf6vqwqLYgtAiICb5luqcA9U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=M1TnjAPq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="M1TnjAPq" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51817C2BC87; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 17:15:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1774372514; bh=Bee7ELSW+8Ka2JJv4DOWB536cqm7x972M6vqivJh9ss=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=M1TnjAPqkHT1TzzbIQgpYVh0g297HBZpWGn7S7MipphR1MeXqNoOPalunNlhjsSmn nEh1pgvueCZkldwxMV/VJWKufiORmzk/hN8LO+WPBXZVzhzaKOrmvyLtRWEEbvTQhF AtgkwOSBgGXnkCYTX5zC3y49ltIeIiS/c1IsnK9KXBSRFSA5UgZuovY5x+BJPG5Idc 4HUM+rtwR0eDZ9xN6rbV0woK95su9/W4TKeoPEqAEOmUDvZxIygDmU16UcbOINDs/2 BVwF7cm9oULNtD/1q6gdsJm7fbJ5sCg8IYRkCfP1V6f2/PCbtvYlx4OTgYqEEiwG/l +6S+LGzbuGu2g== Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 10:15:13 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: cem@kernel.org, Long Li , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: don't expose stale pointers to callers of xlog_recover_iget Message-ID: <20260324171513.GQ6223@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20260323210157.GM6223@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20260323210351.GN6223@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 11:17:51PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 02:03:51PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > From: Darrick J. Wong > > > > Fix this function to avoid exposing a stale pointer to the caller when > > returning an error code after dqattach fails. > > I still think this is silly. > > > Cc: # v5.15 > > Fixes: 4bc619833f738f ("xfs: refactor xfs_iget calls from log intent recovery") > > .. and certainly does not actually fix anything. I'll let cem decide if he wants to trade more stack usage for removing theoretical bugs via this patch, then. --D