All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"# 6 . 14 . x" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: (sashiko review) [PATCH 1/2] mm/damon/core: fix damon_call() vs kdamond_fn() exit race
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 17:43:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260328004307.7244-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260327233319.3528-2-sj@kernel.org>

Forwarding Sashiko review for doing discussions via mails.

# review url: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260327233319.3528-2-sj@kernel.org
# start of sashiko.dev inline review
commit 9cf54c95f0c4bda07c5dbaf4019d0d731f6c58fd
Author: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>

mm/damon/core: fix damon_call() vs kdamond_fn() exit race

This commit introduces a new call_controls_obsolete flag to prevent
damon_call() from adding requests to a terminating kdamond context.
It removes the after-registration DAMON context termination check.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260325141956.87144-1-sj@kernel.org

> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> index db6c67e52d2b..9bcda2765ac9 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -1629,10 +1604,12 @@ int damon_call(struct damon_ctx *ctx, struct damon_call_control *control)
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&control->list);
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
> +	if (ctx->call_controls_obsolete) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
> +		return -ECANCELED;
> +	}
>  	list_add_tail(&control->list, &ctx->call_controls);
>  	mutex_unlock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
> -	if (!damon_is_running(ctx))
> -		return damon_call_handle_inactive_ctx(ctx, control);
>  	if (control->repeat)
>  		return 0;
>  	wait_for_completion(&control->completion);

Can this code trigger a use-after-free on control?

This appears to be a pre-existing issue that remains unfixed. If
kdamond_fn() is terminating, it executes kdamond_call(ctx, true). This
function removes the request, sets it as canceled, and calls kfree(control)
if control->dealloc_on_cancel is true.

Since ctx->call_controls_lock is dropped right before the control->repeat
check:

CPU1 (kdamond_fn)
kdamond_call(ctx, true)
    list_del(&control->list);
    kfree(control);

CPU2 (damon_call)
    mutex_unlock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
    if (control->repeat)

Could kdamond_call() free control before damon_call() evaluates
control->repeat?

Furthermore, if memory poisoning causes the freed memory to evaluate
control->repeat as false, would this proceed to call wait_for_completion()
on the freed memory and cause wait queue corruption?


# end of sashiko.dev inline review
# review url: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260327233319.3528-2-sj@kernel.org
#
# hkml [1] generated a draft of this mail.  It can be regenerated
# using below command:
#
#     hkml patch sashiko_dev --for_forwarding \
#             20260327233319.3528-2-sj@kernel.org
#
# [1] https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail

Sent using hkml (https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail)

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-28  0:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-27 23:33 [PATCH 0/2] mm/damon/core: fix damon_call()/damos_walk() vs kdmond exit race SeongJae Park
2026-03-27 23:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/damon/core: fix damon_call() vs kdamond_fn() " SeongJae Park
2026-03-28  0:43   ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2026-03-28  0:51     ` (sashiko review) " SeongJae Park
2026-03-27 23:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/damon/core: fix damos_walk() " SeongJae Park
2026-03-28  0:42 ` (sashiko status) [PATCH 0/2] mm/damon/core: fix damon_call()/damos_walk() vs kdmond " SeongJae Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260328004307.7244-1-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.