From: luka.gejak@linux.dev
To: Marcos Andrade <marcosandrade95963@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, luka.gejak@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: fix boolean logic and clean up coding style
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 10:40:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260330084019.4356-1-luka.gejak@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260326014221.525368-1-marcosandrade95963@gmail.com>
Thanks for working on this cleanup. The series is well-structured and
almost perfect, however below is my comment on what could be improved.
PATCH 1/2
Looks good, the defensive fix is correct and the commit message explains
the rationale well, but:
The subject lines use 'core:rtw_wlan_util.c' which is non-standard.
The kernel convention for staging patches is:
[PATCH <n/m>] staging: <driver-name>: <short description>
Patch 1/2:
[PATCH 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: fix boolean comparison Switch_DM_Func
PATCH 2/2
Two issues to address:
1) In adaptive_early_32k(), you left this unchanged:
if (pmlmeext->bcn_cnt > 100 && (pmlmeext->adaptive_tsf_done == true))
This should be converted to match the boolean fix in patch 1:
if (pmlmeext->bcn_cnt > 100 && pmlmeext->adaptive_tsf_done)
2) Patch 2 does not apply to staging-next tree, please rebase on top of
a staging-next and resend
Also one more thing, please make proper indentation, if you are line
breaking you should allign ( and ( from line above. Same for letters
you should allign the first letter in bracket with the first letter
from upper line. Your code:
- rtw_hal_set_hwreg(Adapter, HW_VAR_ACK_PREAMBLE, (u8 *)&ShortPreamble);
+ rtw_hal_set_hwreg(Adapter, HW_VAR_ACK_PREAMBLE,
+ (u8 *)&ShortPreamble);
- pmlmeext->bcn_delay_ratio[i] = (pmlmeext->bcn_delay_cnt[i] * 100) / pmlmeext->bcn_cnt;
+ pmlmeext->bcn_delay_ratio[i] = (pmlmeext->bcn_delay_cnt[i] * 100) /
+ pmlmeext->bcn_cnt;
Correct:
- rtw_hal_set_hwreg(Adapter, HW_VAR_ACK_PREAMBLE, (u8 *)&ShortPreamble);
+ rtw_hal_set_hwreg(Adapter, HW_VAR_ACK_PREAMBLE,
+ (u8 *)&ShortPreamble);
- pmlmeext->bcn_delay_ratio[i] = (pmlmeext->bcn_delay_cnt[i] * 100) / pmlmeext->bcn_cnt;
+ pmlmeext->bcn_delay_ratio[i] = (pmlmeext->bcn_delay_cnt[i] * 100) /
+ pmlmeext->bcn_cnt;
Best regards,
Luka Gejak
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-30 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-26 1:42 [PATCH 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: fix boolean logic and clean up coding style Marcos Andrade
2026-03-26 1:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: fix coding style issues in core:rtw_wlan_util.c Marcos Andrade
2026-03-30 16:01 ` Greg KH
2026-03-26 1:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] staging: rtl8723bs: fix coding style and remove dead code Marcos Andrade
2026-03-30 16:01 ` Greg KH
2026-03-30 8:40 ` luka.gejak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260330084019.4356-1-luka.gejak@linux.dev \
--to=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=marcosandrade95963@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.