From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: jiawenwu@trustnetic.com
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, mengyuanlou@net-swift.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, richardcochran@gmail.com,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, horms@kernel.org,
michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com,
kees@kernel.org, joe@dama.to, larysa.zaremba@intel.com,
abdun.nihaal@gmail.com, leitao@debian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 04/11] net: ngbe: implement libwx reset ops
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 17:55:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260331005527.3459556-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260326021406.30444-5-jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
---
net: ngbe: implement libwx reset ops
This commit implements the wx->do_reset() callback for the ngbe driver.
It provides a routine to bring the device down and back up when a reset
is requested while the device is running.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/ngbe/ngbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/ngbe/ngbe_main.c
> index 8c9d505721b17..50a13dcf4b3c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/ngbe/ngbe_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/ngbe/ngbe_main.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -579,6 +586,32 @@ int ngbe_setup_tc(struct net_device *dev, u8 tc)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void ngbe_reinit_locked(struct wx *wx)
> +{
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + netif_trans_update(wx->netdev);
> +
> + err = wx_set_state_reset(wx);
> + if (err) {
> + wx_err(wx, "wait device reset timeout\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + ngbe_down(wx);
> + ngbe_up(wx);
> +
> + clear_bit(WX_STATE_RESETTING, wx->state);
> +}
Is it possible to use a standard kernel mutex here instead of a bit flag for
synchronization?
Looking at the underlying implementation of wx_set_state_reset(), it relies
on an open-coded polling loop:
static inline int wx_set_state_reset(struct wx *wx)
{
u8 timeout = 50;
while (test_and_set_bit(WX_STATE_RESETTING, wx->state)) {
timeout--;
if (!timeout)
return -EBUSY;
usleep_range(1000, 2000);
}
return 0;
}
Using a bit flag and a sleep-polling loop to guard a teardown and bringup
section acts as an ad-hoc lock. This approach bypasses standard kernel
synchronization guarantees and prevents lockdep from analyzing the lock
ordering.
Since this context is allowed to sleep, could this section be protected by
a standard mutex instead?
--
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-31 0:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-26 2:13 [PATCH net-next v6 00/11] Wangxun improvement and new support Jiawen Wu
2026-03-26 2:13 ` [PATCH net-next v6 01/11] net: ngbe: remove netdev->ethtool->wol_enabled setting Jiawen Wu
2026-03-26 2:13 ` [PATCH net-next v6 02/11] net: ngbe: move the WOL functions to libwx Jiawen Wu
2026-03-26 2:13 ` [PATCH net-next v6 03/11] net: ngbe: remove redundant macros Jiawen Wu
2026-03-26 2:13 ` [PATCH net-next v6 04/11] net: ngbe: implement libwx reset ops Jiawen Wu
2026-03-31 0:55 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-03-31 7:19 ` Jiawen Wu
2026-03-31 13:03 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-03-31 23:05 ` Jacob Keller
2026-03-26 2:14 ` [PATCH net-next v6 05/11] net: wangxun: move reusable PCI driver ops functions into libwx Jiawen Wu
2026-03-31 0:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-26 2:14 ` [PATCH net-next v6 06/11] net: txgbe: add power management support Jiawen Wu
2026-03-31 0:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-26 2:14 ` [PATCH net-next v6 07/11] net: wangxun: move ethtool_ops.set_channels into libwx Jiawen Wu
2026-03-26 2:14 ` [PATCH net-next v6 08/11] net: wangxun: delete service_timer before cancel service_work Jiawen Wu
2026-03-31 0:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-26 2:14 ` [PATCH net-next v6 09/11] net: wangxun: add Tx timeout process Jiawen Wu
2026-03-31 0:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-26 2:14 ` [PATCH net-next v6 10/11] net: wangxun: improve flow control setting Jiawen Wu
2026-03-31 0:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-26 2:14 ` [PATCH net-next v6 11/11] net: wangxun: implement pci_error_handlers ops Jiawen Wu
2026-03-31 0:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-21 14:33 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-03-31 0:54 ` [PATCH net-next v6 00/11] Wangxun improvement and new support Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260331005527.3459556-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=abdun.nihaal@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jiawenwu@trustnetic.com \
--cc=joe@dama.to \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mengyuanlou@net-swift.com \
--cc=michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.