From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, oss@malat.biz, paulmck@kernel.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bootconfig: Apply early options from embedded config
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 12:58:27 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260331125827.157a833882830007ea9b0b31@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <acqJk-zbyjIiy6hJ@gmail.com>
On Mon, 30 Mar 2026 08:04:23 -0700
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 06:15:17AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 10:37:44PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > On Fri, 27 Mar 2026 03:06:41 -0700
> > > Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > > > > To fix this, we need to change setup_arch() for each architecture so
> > > > > that it calls this bootconfig_apply_early_params().
> > > >
> > > > Could we instead integrate this into parse_early_param() itself? That
> > > > approach would avoid the need to modify each architecture individually.
> > >
> > > Ah, indeed.
> >
> > I investigated integrating bootconfig into parse_early_param() and hit a
> > blocker: xbc_init() and xbc_make_cmdline() depend on memblock_alloc(), but on
> > most architectures (x86, arm64, arm, s390, riscv) parse_early_param() is called
> > from setup_arch() _before_ memblock is initialized.
>
> That said, I'd like to propose a simpler approach as a first step:
>
> 1) Keep calling bootconfig_apply_early_params() from setup_boot_config().
> This is the least intrusive approach and expands bootconfig support to
> additional early boot parameters.
>
> 2) Document that architecture-specific early parameters might be ignored.
> If a parameter is consumed early enough (during setup_arch()), it will
> not see the bootconfig value.
We have to carefully do this because what parameter is arch specific or not
depends on architecture and undocumented.
How about introducing a new Kconfig, which supports early params by
embedded bootconfig?
>
> 3) Ensure that early bootconfig parameters don't overwrite the boot command
> line. For example, if the boot command line has foo=bar and bootconfig
> later has foo=baz, the command line value should take precedence.
> This prevents early boot code (in setup_arch()) from seeing a parameter
> value that will be changed later.
OK, this also needs to be considered. Currently we just pass the bootconfig
parameters right before bootloader given parameters as "extra_command_line"
if "bootconfig" in cmdline or CONFIG_BOOT_CONFIG_FORCE=y.
[boot_config(.kernel)]<command_line>[ -- [boot_config(.init)][init_command_line]]
This is currently expected behavior. The bootconfig parameters are
expected to be overridden by command_line or command_line are appended.
If we change this for early params, we also should change the expected
output of /proc/cmdline too. I think we have 2 options;
- As before, we expect the parameters provided by the boot configuration
to be processed first and then overridden later by the command line.
Or,
- ignore all parameters which is given from the command line, this also
updates existing setup_boot_config() (means xbc_snprint_cmdline() ).
Anyway, this behavior change will also be a bit critical... We have
to announce it.
>
>
> If that is OK, that is what I have right now:
Let me comment on it.
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/bootconfig.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/bootconfig.rst
> index f712758472d5c..6ed852a0c66d8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/bootconfig.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/bootconfig.rst
> @@ -169,6 +169,15 @@ Boot Kernel With a Boot Config
> There are two options to boot the kernel with bootconfig: attaching the
> bootconfig to the initrd image or embedding it in the kernel itself.
>
> +Early options (those registered with ``early_param()``) may only be
> +specified in the embedded bootconfig, because the initrd is not yet
> +available when early parameters are processed.
> +
> +Note that embedded bootconfig is parsed after ``setup_arch()``, so
> +early options that are consumed during architecture initialization
> +(e.g., ``mem=``, ``memmap=``, ``earlycon``, ``noapic``, ``nolapic``,
> +``acpi=``, ``numa=``, ``iommu=``) may not take effect from bootconfig.
> +
This is easy to explain, but it's quite troublesome for users to
determine which parameters are unavailable. Currently we can identify
it by `git grep early_param -- arch/${ARCH}`. But it is setup in
setup_arch() we need to track the source code. (Or ask AI :))
> Attaching a Boot Config to Initrd
> ---------------------------------
>
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index 7484cd703bc1a..34adcc1feb9b6 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -1525,6 +1525,16 @@ config BOOT_CONFIG_EMBED
> image. But if the system doesn't support initrd, this option will
> help you by embedding a bootconfig file while building the kernel.
>
> + Unlike bootconfig attached to initrd, the embedded bootconfig also
> + supports early options (those registered with early_param()). Any
> + kernel.* key in the embedded bootconfig is applied before
> + parse_early_param() runs. Early options in initrd bootconfig will
> + not be applied. Early options consumed during setup_arch() (e.g.
> + mem=, memmap=, earlycon, noapic, acpi=, numa=, iommu=) may not
> + take effect. If the same early option
> + appears in both bootconfig and the kernel command line, the
> + command line value takes precedence.
> +
As a compromise, how about making this a separate Kconfig?
config BOOT_CONFIG_EMBED_EARLY_PARAM
bool "Support early_params in embedded bootconfig"
and afterwards, we can introduce
depends on ARCH_BOOT_CONFIG_EMBED_EARLY_PARAM
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-31 3:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-25 10:05 [PATCH v2] bootconfig: Apply early options from embedded config Breno Leitao
2026-03-25 14:22 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-03-26 14:30 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-03-27 10:18 ` Breno Leitao
2026-03-27 14:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-03-27 16:11 ` Breno Leitao
2026-03-27 10:06 ` Breno Leitao
2026-03-27 13:37 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-03-30 13:15 ` Breno Leitao
2026-03-30 15:04 ` Breno Leitao
2026-03-31 3:58 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2026-03-31 15:27 ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-01 13:48 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-04-01 15:01 ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-03 2:45 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-04-07 10:19 ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-15 11:15 ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-17 1:46 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-03-31 0:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-03-31 10:18 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-04-01 1:02 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-04-01 9:40 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260331125827.157a833882830007ea9b0b31@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oss@malat.biz \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.