From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, Avinesh Kumar <avinesh.kumar@suse.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] zram: do not forget to endio for partial discard requests
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 17:49:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260331174926.58ef8dc4d40ac12f8ce3905d@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260331074255.777019-1-senozhatsky@chromium.org>
On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 16:42:44 +0900 Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org> wrote:
> As reported by Qu Wenruo, the following
>
> getconf PAGESIZE
> 65536
> blkdiscard -p 4k /dev/zram0
>
> takes literally forever to complete.
I'm wondering how you measured this interval ;)
> zram doesn't support
> partial discards and just returns immediately w/o doing any
> discard work in such cases. The problem is that we forget
> to endio on our way out, so blkdiscard sleeps forever in
> submit_bio_wait(). Fix this by jumping to end_bio label,
> which does bio_endio().
>
> Fixes: 0120dd6e4e202 ("zram: make zram_bio_discard more self-contained")
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
> Reported-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/92361cd3-fb8b-482e-bc89-15ff1acb9a59@suse.com
> Test-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> Cc: Avinesh Kumar <avinesh.kumar@suse.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Thanks. I made several changes to the changelog from the earlier
discussion (Anivesh Reported-by:/Closes:) and added a cc:stable.
0120dd6e4e202 was a few years ago so no need to rush this into mainline
- target this to the upcoming merge window.
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: zram: do not forget to endio for partial discard requests
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 16:42:44 +0900
As reported by Qu Wenruo and Avinesh Kumar, the following
getconf PAGESIZE
65536
blkdiscard -p 4k /dev/zram0
takes literally forever to complete. zram doesn't support partial
discards and just returns immediately w/o doing any discard work in such
cases. The problem is that we forget to endio on our way out, so
blkdiscard sleeps forever in submit_bio_wait(). Fix this by jumping to
end_bio label, which does bio_endio().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20260331074255.777019-1-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Fixes: 0120dd6e4e202 ("zram: make zram_bio_discard more self-contained")
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Reported-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/92361cd3-fb8b-482e-bc89-15ff1acb9a59@suse.com
Tested-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reported-by: Avinesh Kumar <avinesh.kumar@suse.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256530
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c~zram-do-not-forget-to-endio-for-partial-discard-requests
+++ a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -2678,7 +2678,7 @@ static void zram_bio_discard(struct zram
*/
if (offset) {
if (n <= (PAGE_SIZE - offset))
- return;
+ goto end_bio;
n -= (PAGE_SIZE - offset);
index++;
@@ -2693,6 +2693,7 @@ static void zram_bio_discard(struct zram
n -= PAGE_SIZE;
}
+end_bio:
bio_endio(bio);
}
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-01 0:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-31 7:42 [PATCH v3] zram: do not forget to endio for partial discard requests Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-03-31 15:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-01 0:49 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2026-04-01 1:10 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260331174926.58ef8dc4d40ac12f8ce3905d@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avinesh.kumar@suse.com \
--cc=bgeffon@google.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.