From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83A5B301493 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2026 04:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775017380; cv=none; b=UOX/OLqwvO0IF/b+JW0tQbiIF90PKOmtNfa9spwCWdQjsbfoUn8fni/F6Cx4bWikCsY43bdO8Jyl/jncyBiG5iTIBPvGSel3+/Rax7irPngw3L8DrHqNEPWuW26khfIsfNu37CP4foi6jIx5lJrm/K00peDdtUJTsV/14E9s0Ys= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775017380; c=relaxed/simple; bh=omIKvZbaLjAte5tSNkqePsgEAGpT5HrhyAyvQp3+BHg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID; b=B5ttUwqZDXjZ1YDjagqOyifRnQPvcm5s3a4XFYp5LMLSXfNFUTqcLmJ+pYCwHXFYD9mXzKjepKsNleZFAYb6L5iJmuWxd9+bnxG6C7uyswDhf5fg78+3WKYU7vZDjXFm7Ov7SYpBj3LgYfRW2kszB/4ngCmZEBs8R8NPSzIj0+s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=iI0GVzGY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="iI0GVzGY" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1775017378; x=1806553378; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id; bh=omIKvZbaLjAte5tSNkqePsgEAGpT5HrhyAyvQp3+BHg=; b=iI0GVzGYnG2Cte52ecouq0ZGenSSVgXqO2d69fGX6XGMKDv8xpRuBAxi GAWF6CTWXm1AwtGSh8Ls8sYqIJ4QnoTVqYwzqiWcwbDR4U12XLkMH4rQu TtS9V7kNcY19lyTFvZkxnPZv4AxWeQ01PoJTVB/bfhUpkP8iQQ/7iyHMT 6F6hYj0icmR2ysHpLsLlcUeT71lTzlkI11uEJXL4p7X966LD547CqHMGd cqXp5X3fs8a5mPRSm1oQpCz/Zn9Ac1MNA+mEw/Y9AZLao26gpL9DSfd1q Ro9teR/+KehBtq/oZgwTmp2g1agJHpMRoZKkfyua/7OT7eULo9PEkETAR A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: yIL1B+NMQlGqy7OrSComCw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: AUFrZMDgTH6FuWLwRT1L2w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11745"; a="76160416" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,153,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="76160416" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 31 Mar 2026 21:22:58 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 2es2eaNAS/yAobffpZaM+w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Xwnu8osSQ1CLOAvZ8Qg2hQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,153,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="221706987" Received: from igk-lkp-server01.igk.intel.com (HELO 9958d990ccf2) ([10.211.93.152]) by fmviesa006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 Mar 2026 21:22:56 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 9958d990ccf2 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1w7n6U-000000008dl-41sD; Wed, 01 Apr 2026 04:22:54 +0000 Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2026 06:22:48 +0200 From: kernel test robot To: cros-kernel-buildreports@googlegroups.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: [android-common:mirror-poly-aosp-pixel-malibu 1/1] iommufd_utils.h:649:18: error: 'struct iommu_hw_info' has no member named 'in_data_type'; did you mean 'out_data_type'? Message-ID: <202604010624.EwhbbCOh-lkp@intel.com> User-Agent: s-nail v14.9.25 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi Nicolin, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common mirror-poly-aosp-pixel-malibu head: 9cbd7eeda1fe517f9ce3451fb3d7b4663df71429 commit: 724f6df514f78613995fb5c02463e42429942495 [1/1] iommufd/selftest: Update hw_info coverage for an input data_type config: i386-allnoconfig-bpf (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260401/202604010624.EwhbbCOh-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260401/202604010624.EwhbbCOh-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202604010624.EwhbbCOh-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from iommufd.c:10: iommufd_utils.h: In function '_test_cmd_get_hw_info': >> iommufd_utils.h:649:18: error: 'struct iommu_hw_info' has no member named 'in_data_type'; did you mean 'out_data_type'? 649 | .in_data_type = data_type, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ | out_data_type >> iommufd_utils.h:655:26: error: 'IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_DEFAULT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_SELFTEST'? 655 | if (data_type != IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_DEFAULT) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_SELFTEST iommufd_utils.h:655:26: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in >> iommufd_utils.h:656:30: error: 'IOMMU_HW_INFO_FLAG_INPUT_TYPE' undeclared (first use in this function) 656 | cmd.flags |= IOMMU_HW_INFO_FLAG_INPUT_TYPE; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from iommufd_utils.h:13: iommufd.c: In function 'iommufd_ioas_setup': iommufd.c:230:44: error: 'MOCK_FLAGS_DEVICE_PASID' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MOCK_FLAGS_DEVICE_NO_DIRTY'? 230 | MOCK_FLAGS_DEVICE_PASID, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../kselftest_harness.h:758:20: note: in definition of macro '__EXPECT' 758 | __typeof__(_seen) __seen = (_seen); \ | ^~~~~ iommufd_utils.h:123:9: note: in expansion of macro 'ASSERT_EQ' 123 | ASSERT_EQ(0, _test_cmd_mock_domain_flags(self->fd, ioas_id, flags, \ | ^~~~~~~~~ iommufd.c:229:17: note: in expansion of macro 'test_cmd_mock_domain_flags' 229 | test_cmd_mock_domain_flags(self->ioas_id, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ iommufd.c: In function 'iommufd_ioas_get_hw_info': >> iommufd.c:618:38: error: 'IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_DEFAULT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_SELFTEST'? 618 | IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_DEFAULT, NULL, 0); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../kselftest_harness.h:758:20: note: in definition of macro '__EXPECT' 758 | __typeof__(_seen) __seen = (_seen); \ | ^~~~~ iommufd_utils.h:701:9: note: in expansion of macro 'ASSERT_EQ' 701 | ASSERT_EQ(0, _test_cmd_get_hw_info(self->fd, device_id, data_type, \ | ^~~~~~~~~ iommufd.c:617:17: note: in expansion of macro 'test_cmd_get_hw_info' 617 | test_cmd_get_hw_info(self->device_id, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ iommufd.c:650:35: error: 'MOCK_PASID_WIDTH' undeclared (first use in this function) 650 | ASSERT_EQ(MOCK_PASID_WIDTH, max_pasid); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../kselftest_harness.h:757:20: note: in definition of macro '__EXPECT' 757 | __typeof__(_expected) __exp = (_expected); \ | ^~~~~~~~~ iommufd.c:650:25: note: in expansion of macro 'ASSERT_EQ' 650 | ASSERT_EQ(MOCK_PASID_WIDTH, max_pasid); | ^~~~~~~~~ iommufd.c: In function 'iommufd_dirty_tracking_device_dirty_capability': iommufd_utils.h:711:44: error: 'IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_DEFAULT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_SELFTEST'? 711 | IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_DEFAULT, NULL, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../kselftest_harness.h:758:20: note: in definition of macro '__EXPECT' 758 | __typeof__(_seen) __seen = (_seen); \ | ^~~~~ iommufd_utils.h:710:9: note: in expansion of macro 'ASSERT_EQ' 710 | ASSERT_EQ(0, _test_cmd_get_hw_info(self->fd, device_id, \ | ^~~~~~~~~ iommufd.c:1965:9: note: in expansion of macro 'test_cmd_get_hw_capabilities' 1965 | test_cmd_get_hw_capabilities(self->idev_id, caps); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- In file included from iommufd_fail_nth.c:23: iommufd_utils.h: In function '_test_cmd_get_hw_info': >> iommufd_utils.h:649:18: error: 'struct iommu_hw_info' has no member named 'in_data_type'; did you mean 'out_data_type'? 649 | .in_data_type = data_type, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ | out_data_type >> iommufd_utils.h:655:26: error: 'IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_DEFAULT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_SELFTEST'? 655 | if (data_type != IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_DEFAULT) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_SELFTEST iommufd_utils.h:655:26: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in >> iommufd_utils.h:656:30: error: 'IOMMU_HW_INFO_FLAG_INPUT_TYPE' undeclared (first use in this function) 656 | cmd.flags |= IOMMU_HW_INFO_FLAG_INPUT_TYPE; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ iommufd_fail_nth.c: In function 'test_nth_device': >> iommufd_fail_nth.c:615:54: error: 'IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_DEFAULT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_SELFTEST'? 615 | if (_test_cmd_get_hw_info(self->fd, idev_id, IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_DEFAULT, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_SELFTEST -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki