From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: bkov@amazon.com, fgriffo@amazon.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop/zap existing present SPTE even when" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2026 05:49:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026040202-confusion-deepness-720f@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac2NRUTLk-yX13va@google.com>
On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 02:25:25PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2026, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> >
> > The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
>
> ...
>
> > Fixes: a54aa15c6bda3 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Handle MMIO SPTEs directly in mmu_set_spte()")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>
> Partially out of curiosity, partially to reduce the probability of future goofs,
> why did the tooling try to apply a patch to a kernel without the Fixes commit?
> 5.10 doesn't have a54aa15c6bda3 and so doesn't need this fix.
>
> I assumed that having an explicit Fixes would implicit scope the backport to
> kernels with that commit (or a backport of that commit).
Yeah, my fault, I still "manually" read that, and my script properly
spit out:
Commit id aad885e774966e97b675dfe928da164214a71605
queued in: queue-6.19/kvm-x86-mmu-drop-zap-existing-present-spte-even-when-creating-an-mmio-spte.patch
queued in: queue-6.18/kvm-x86-mmu-drop-zap-existing-present-spte-even-when-creating-an-mmio-spte.patch
queued in: queue-6.12/kvm-x86-mmu-drop-zap-existing-present-spte-even-when-creating-an-mmio-spte.patch
queued in: queue-6.6/kvm-x86-mmu-drop-zap-existing-present-spte-even-when-creating-an-mmio-spte.patch
fixed in: 5.13
> ○ 6.19
○ 6.18
○ 6.12
○ 6.6
○ 6.1
○ 5.15
○ 5.10
But I guess I seleced "5.10" accidentally as well.
Sorry about that, my fault, one of these days I'll make the script a bit
smarter to "pre-populate" the checkboxes with what it thinks should be
happening here, and not require me to actually read values :)
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-02 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-30 9:39 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop/zap existing present SPTE even when" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2026-04-01 0:44 ` [PATCH 5.10.y] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop/zap existing present SPTE even when creating an MMIO SPTE Sasha Levin
2026-04-01 21:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-04-01 21:25 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop/zap existing present SPTE even when" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree Sean Christopherson
2026-04-02 3:49 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026040202-confusion-deepness-720f@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bkov@amazon.com \
--cc=fgriffo@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.