From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] iommu/vt-d: Simplify calculate_psi_aligned_address()
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2026 12:35:22 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260402153522.GF310919@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b23df32-ed14-417f-b694-a191f4423aac@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 04:39:08PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 4/2/26 14:57, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > From: Jason Gunthorpe<jgg@nvidia.com>
> >
> > This is doing far too much math for the simple task of finding a power
> > of 2 that fully spans the given range. Use fls directly on the xor
> > which computes the common binary prefix.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe<jgg@nvidia.com>
> > Link:https://lore.kernel.org/r/4-v1-f175e27af136+11647-
> > iommupt_inv_vtd_jgg@nvidia.com
> > Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/intel/cache.c | 49 ++++++++++++-------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> Hi Joerg,
>
> Can you please remove this last patch from the pull request? The AI
> reviewer reported an issue in this patch.
>
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260402065734.1687476-1-baolu.lu%40linux.intel.com
Yeah, that's an interesting remark. I think this is enough to deal
with all of its items:
- if (unlikely(sz_lg2 >= MAX_AGAW_PFN_WIDTH)) {
+ if (unlikely(sz_lg2 >= BITS_PER_LONG)) {
+ /*
+ * MAX_AGAW_PFN_WIDTH triggers full invalidation in all
+ * downstream users.
+ */
*size_order = MAX_AGAW_PFN_WIDTH;
return 0;
}
1) Yes AGAW_PFN_WIDTH is in "PFN" not byte notation, so it is off by
12 bits and we would errantly move to full invalidation too soon
2) Yes, if sz_lg2 is BITS_PER_LONG the GENMASK explodes, in this case
it should trigger full invalidation even if ulong is 32 bits
3) Yes, we sould retain the 0/ULONG_MASK means full invalidation, but
this happens properly now because of the above BITS_PER_LONG check
so no need to bring back the other check.
I'll post an updated patch
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-02 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-02 6:57 [PATCH 00/10] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for v7.1 Lu Baolu
2026-04-02 6:57 ` [PATCH 01/10] iommu/vt-d: Block PASID attachment to nested domain with dirty tracking Lu Baolu
2026-04-02 6:57 ` [PATCH 02/10] iommu/vt-d: Rename device_set_dirty_tracking() and pass dmar_domain pointer Lu Baolu
2026-04-02 6:57 ` [PATCH 03/10] iommu/vt-d: Support dirty tracking on PASID Lu Baolu
2026-04-02 6:57 ` [PATCH 04/10] iommufd/selftest: Test " Lu Baolu
2026-04-02 6:57 ` [PATCH 05/10] iommu/vt-d: Remove dmar_readl() and dmar_readq() Lu Baolu
2026-04-02 6:57 ` [PATCH 06/10] iommu/vt-d: Remove dmar_writel() and dmar_writeq() Lu Baolu
2026-04-02 6:57 ` [PATCH 07/10] iommu/vt-d: Split piotlb invalidation into range and all Lu Baolu
2026-04-02 6:57 ` [PATCH 08/10] iommu/vt-d: Pass size_order to qi_desc_piotlb() not npages Lu Baolu
2026-04-02 6:57 ` [PATCH 09/10] iommu/vt-d: Remove the remaining pages along the invalidation path Lu Baolu
2026-04-02 6:57 ` [PATCH 10/10] iommu/vt-d: Simplify calculate_psi_aligned_address() Lu Baolu
2026-04-02 8:39 ` Baolu Lu
2026-04-02 9:46 ` Joerg Roedel
2026-04-02 15:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2026-04-02 7:26 ` [PATCH 00/10] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for v7.1 Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260402153522.GF310919@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.