All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qi Tang <tpluszz77@gmail.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, Qi Tang <tpluszz77@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf v4 1/2] bpf: reject direct access to nullable PTR_TO_BUF pointers
Date: Fri,  3 Apr 2026 11:38:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260403033828.18529-2-tpluszz77@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260403033828.18529-1-tpluszz77@gmail.com>

check_mem_access() matches PTR_TO_BUF via base_type() which strips
PTR_MAYBE_NULL, allowing direct dereference without a null check.

Map iterator ctx->key and ctx->value are PTR_TO_BUF | PTR_MAYBE_NULL.
On stop callbacks these are NULL, causing a kernel NULL dereference.

Add a type_may_be_null() guard to the PTR_TO_BUF branch, matching the
existing PTR_TO_BTF_ID pattern.

Fixes: 20b2aff4bc15 ("bpf: Introduce MEM_RDONLY flag")
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Qi Tang <tpluszz77@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 937c9adf1b3d..17850836943b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -7905,7 +7905,8 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn
 	} else if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_MAP) {
 		err = check_ptr_to_map_access(env, regs, regno, off, size, t,
 					      value_regno);
-	} else if (base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_BUF) {
+	} else if (base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_BUF &&
+		   !type_may_be_null(reg->type)) {
 		bool rdonly_mem = type_is_rdonly_mem(reg->type);
 		u32 *max_access;
 
-- 
2.43.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-03  3:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-03  3:38 [PATCH bpf v4 0/2] bpf: reject direct access to nullable PTR_TO_BUF pointers Qi Tang
2026-04-03  3:38 ` Qi Tang [this message]
2026-04-03  6:16   ` [PATCH bpf v4 1/2] " Amery Hung
2026-04-03  3:38 ` [PATCH bpf v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: add test for nullable PTR_TO_BUF access Qi Tang
2026-04-03  6:16   ` Amery Hung
2026-04-06 20:13     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-04-07 13:42       ` Qi Tang
2026-04-03 15:27 ` [PATCH bpf v4 0/2] bpf: reject direct access to nullable PTR_TO_BUF pointers patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260403033828.18529-2-tpluszz77@gmail.com \
    --to=tpluszz77@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.