From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: macb: Remove dedicated IRQ handler for WoL
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2026 17:17:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260403161707.GO113102@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260328-macb-irq-v1-0-7b3e622fb46c@gmail.com>
On Sat, Mar 28, 2026 at 06:17:44PM +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> During debugging of a suspend/resume issue, I observed that the macb driver
> employs a dedicated IRQ handler for Wake-on-LAN (WoL) support. To my knowledge,
> no other Ethernet driver adopts this approach. This implementation unnecessarily
> complicates the suspend/resume process without providing any clear benefit.
> Instead, we can easily modify the existing IRQ handler to manage WoL events,
> avoiding any overhead in the TX/RX hot path.
>
> I am skeptical that the minor optimizations to the IRQ handler proposed in this
> patch series would yield any measurable performance improvement. However, it
> does appear that the execution time of the macb_interrupt() function is
> slightly reduced.
>
> The following data(net throughput and execution time of macb_interrupt) were
> collected from my AMD Zynqmp board using the commands:
> taskset -c 1,2,3 iperf3 -c 192.168.3.4 -t 60 -Z -P 3 -R
> cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_stat/function0
...
For the series:
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-03 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-28 10:17 [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: macb: Remove dedicated IRQ handler for WoL Kevin Hao
2026-03-28 10:17 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: macb: Replace open-coded implementation with napi_schedule() Kevin Hao
2026-03-28 10:17 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: macb: Consolidate MACB_CAPS_ISR_CLEAR_ON_WRITE checks in IRQ handler Kevin Hao
2026-04-01 2:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-01 9:30 ` Kevin Hao
2026-04-01 11:49 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-04-02 13:44 ` Kevin Hao
2026-03-28 10:17 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: macb: Factor out the handling of non-hot IRQ events into a separate function Kevin Hao
2026-04-01 2:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-01 9:31 ` Kevin Hao
2026-03-28 10:17 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] net: macb: Remove dedicated IRQ handler for WoL Kevin Hao
2026-04-01 2:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-01 9:32 ` Kevin Hao
2026-04-03 16:17 ` Simon Horman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260403161707.GO113102@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haokexin@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.