From: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
To: jic23@kernel.org, dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com,
andy@kernel.org
Cc: kees@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/5] iio: ssp_sensors: factor out pending list add/remove helpers
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2026 13:38:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260406080852.2727453-4-sanjayembedded@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260406080852.2727453-1-sanjayembedded@gmail.com>
From: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
The SSP SPI transfer path manipulates the pending message list in
multiple places, each time open-coding the same locking and list
operations.
Re-factor the pending list add and delete logic into small helper
functions to avoid duplication and simplify transfer flow to follow.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
---
drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c | 34 +++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c b/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c
index 08ed92859be0..7c1780e15acf 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c
@@ -174,6 +174,22 @@ static int ssp_check_lines(struct ssp_data *data, bool state)
return 0;
}
+static inline void ssp_pending_add(struct ssp_data *data,
+ struct ssp_msg *msg)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&data->pending_lock);
+ list_add_tail(&msg->list, &data->pending_list);
+ mutex_unlock(&data->pending_lock);
+}
+
+static inline void ssp_pending_del(struct ssp_data *data,
+ struct ssp_msg *msg)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&data->pending_lock);
+ list_del(&msg->list);
+ mutex_unlock(&data->pending_lock);
+}
+
static int ssp_do_transfer(struct ssp_data *data, struct ssp_msg *msg,
struct completion *done, int timeout)
{
@@ -202,19 +218,13 @@ static int ssp_do_transfer(struct ssp_data *data, struct ssp_msg *msg,
goto _error_locked;
}
- if (!use_no_irq) {
- mutex_lock(&data->pending_lock);
- list_add_tail(&msg->list, &data->pending_list);
- mutex_unlock(&data->pending_lock);
- }
+ if (!use_no_irq)
+ ssp_pending_add(data, msg);
status = ssp_check_lines(data, true);
if (status < 0) {
- if (!use_no_irq) {
- mutex_lock(&data->pending_lock);
- list_del(&msg->list);
- mutex_unlock(&data->pending_lock);
- }
+ if (!use_no_irq)
+ ssp_pending_del(data, msg);
goto _error_locked;
}
@@ -224,9 +234,7 @@ static int ssp_do_transfer(struct ssp_data *data, struct ssp_msg *msg,
if (wait_for_completion_timeout(done,
msecs_to_jiffies(timeout)) ==
0) {
- mutex_lock(&data->pending_lock);
- list_del(&msg->list);
- mutex_unlock(&data->pending_lock);
+ ssp_pending_del(data, msg);
data->timeout_cnt++;
return -ETIMEDOUT;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-06 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-06 8:08 [PATCH v5 0/5] iio: ssp_sensors: improve resource cleanup Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-06 8:08 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] iio: ssp_sensors: cleanup codestyle warning Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-06 18:33 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-07 17:42 ` Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-07 19:32 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-06 8:08 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] iio: ssp_sensors: cleanup codestyle check Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-06 8:08 ` Sanjay Chitroda [this message]
2026-04-06 20:04 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] iio: ssp_sensors: factor out pending list add/remove helpers Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-08 8:22 ` Sanjay Chitroda
[not found] ` <FA511CDD-1F98-4E66-BCE8-5156DBAF4359@gmail.com>
2026-04-08 11:36 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-06 8:08 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] iio: ssp_sensors: use devm APIs for mutex and IRQ resources Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-06 16:14 ` David Lechner
2026-04-11 11:35 ` Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-11 18:31 ` David Lechner
2026-04-12 16:45 ` Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-07 12:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-11 11:41 ` Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-06 8:08 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] iio: ssp_sensors: reuse preallocated RX buffer for SPI transfers Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-06 16:07 ` David Lechner
2026-04-11 11:57 ` Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-11 12:17 ` Sanjay Chitroda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260406080852.2727453-4-sanjayembedded@gmail.com \
--to=sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.