From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: werner@verivus.ai, Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>,
Sun Jian <sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add tests for sock_ops ctx access with same src/dst register
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2026 10:26:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260407022720.162151-3-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260407022720.162151-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Add selftests to verify SOCK_OPS_GET_SK() and SOCK_OPS_GET_FIELD() correctly
return NULL/zero when dst_reg == src_reg and is_fullsock == 0.
Three subtests are included:
- get_sk: ctx->sk with same src/dst register (SOCK_OPS_GET_SK)
- get_field: ctx->snd_cwnd with same src/dst register (SOCK_OPS_GET_FIELD)
- get_sk_diff_reg: ctx->sk with different src/dst register (baseline)
Each BPF program uses inline asm (__naked) to force specific register
allocation, reads is_fullsock first, then loads the field using the same
(or different) register. The test triggers TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV via a TCP
handshake and checks that the result is NULL/zero when is_fullsock == 0.
Reviewed-by: Sun Jian <sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/sock_ops_get_sk.c | 76 ++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/sock_ops_get_sk.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 193 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_ops_get_sk.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_ops_get_sk.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_ops_get_sk.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_ops_get_sk.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..343d92c4df30d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_ops_get_sk.c
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "cgroup_helpers.h"
+#include "network_helpers.h"
+#include "sock_ops_get_sk.skel.h"
+
+/* See progs/sock_ops_get_sk.c for the bug description. */
+static void run_sock_ops_test(int cgroup_fd, int prog_fd)
+{
+ int server_fd, client_fd, err;
+
+ err = bpf_prog_attach(prog_fd, cgroup_fd, BPF_CGROUP_SOCK_OPS, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "prog_attach"))
+ return;
+
+ server_fd = start_server(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, NULL, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(server_fd, "start_server"))
+ goto detach;
+
+ /* Trigger TCP handshake which causes TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV state where
+ * is_fullsock == 0 and is_locked_tcp_sock == 0.
+ */
+ client_fd = connect_to_fd(server_fd, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(client_fd, "connect_to_fd"))
+ goto close_server;
+
+ close(client_fd);
+
+close_server:
+ close(server_fd);
+detach:
+ bpf_prog_detach(cgroup_fd, BPF_CGROUP_SOCK_OPS);
+}
+
+void test_ns_sock_ops_get_sk(void)
+{
+ struct sock_ops_get_sk *skel;
+ int cgroup_fd;
+
+ cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/sock_ops_get_sk");
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(cgroup_fd, "join_cgroup"))
+ return;
+
+ skel = sock_ops_get_sk__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open_load"))
+ goto close_cgroup;
+
+ /* Test SOCK_OPS_GET_SK with same src/dst register */
+ if (test__start_subtest("get_sk")) {
+ run_sock_ops_test(cgroup_fd,
+ bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.sock_ops_get_sk_same_reg));
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->null_seen, 1, "null_seen");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->bug_detected, 0, "bug_not_detected");
+ }
+
+ /* Test SOCK_OPS_GET_FIELD with same src/dst register */
+ if (test__start_subtest("get_field")) {
+ run_sock_ops_test(cgroup_fd,
+ bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.sock_ops_get_field_same_reg));
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->field_null_seen, 1, "field_null_seen");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->field_bug_detected, 0, "field_bug_not_detected");
+ }
+
+ /* Test SOCK_OPS_GET_SK with different src/dst register */
+ if (test__start_subtest("get_sk_diff_reg")) {
+ run_sock_ops_test(cgroup_fd,
+ bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.sock_ops_get_sk_diff_reg));
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->diff_reg_null_seen, 1, "diff_reg_null_seen");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->diff_reg_bug_detected, 0, "diff_reg_bug_not_detected");
+ }
+
+ sock_ops_get_sk__destroy(skel);
+close_cgroup:
+ close(cgroup_fd);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_ops_get_sk.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_ops_get_sk.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..3a0689f8ce7ca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_ops_get_sk.c
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+/*
+ * Test the SOCK_OPS_GET_SK() and SOCK_OPS_GET_FIELD() macros in
+ * sock_ops_convert_ctx_access() when dst_reg == src_reg.
+ *
+ * When dst_reg == src_reg, the macros borrow a temporary register to load
+ * is_fullsock / is_locked_tcp_sock, because dst_reg holds the ctx pointer
+ * and cannot be clobbered before ctx->sk / ctx->field is read. If
+ * is_fullsock == 0 (e.g., TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV with a request_sock), the macro
+ * must still zero dst_reg so the verifier's PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL /
+ * SCALAR_VALUE type is correct at runtime. A missing clear leaves a stale
+ * ctx pointer in dst_reg that passes NULL checks (GET_SK) or leaks a kernel
+ * address as a scalar (GET_FIELD).
+ *
+ * When dst_reg != src_reg, dst_reg itself is used to load is_fullsock, so
+ * the JEQ (dst_reg == 0) naturally leaves it zeroed on the !fullsock path.
+ */
+
+int bug_detected;
+int null_seen;
+
+SEC("sockops")
+__naked void sock_ops_get_sk_same_reg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r7 = *(u32 *)(r1 + %[is_fullsock_off]);"
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + %[sk_off]);"
+ "if r7 != 0 goto 2f;"
+ "if r1 == 0 goto 1f;"
+ "r1 = %[bug_detected] ll;"
+ "r2 = 1;"
+ "*(u32 *)(r1 + 0) = r2;"
+ "goto 2f;"
+ "1:"
+ "r1 = %[null_seen] ll;"
+ "r2 = 1;"
+ "*(u32 *)(r1 + 0) = r2;"
+ "2:"
+ "r0 = 1;"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm_const(is_fullsock_off, offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops, is_fullsock)),
+ __imm_const(sk_off, offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops, sk)),
+ __imm_addr(bug_detected),
+ __imm_addr(null_seen)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+/* SOCK_OPS_GET_FIELD: same-register, is_locked_tcp_sock == 0 path. */
+int field_bug_detected;
+int field_null_seen;
+
+SEC("sockops")
+__naked void sock_ops_get_field_same_reg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r7 = *(u32 *)(r1 + %[is_fullsock_off]);"
+ "r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + %[snd_cwnd_off]);"
+ "if r7 != 0 goto 2f;"
+ "if r1 == 0 goto 1f;"
+ "r1 = %[field_bug_detected] ll;"
+ "r2 = 1;"
+ "*(u32 *)(r1 + 0) = r2;"
+ "goto 2f;"
+ "1:"
+ "r1 = %[field_null_seen] ll;"
+ "r2 = 1;"
+ "*(u32 *)(r1 + 0) = r2;"
+ "2:"
+ "r0 = 1;"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm_const(is_fullsock_off, offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops, is_fullsock)),
+ __imm_const(snd_cwnd_off, offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops, snd_cwnd)),
+ __imm_addr(field_bug_detected),
+ __imm_addr(field_null_seen)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+/* SOCK_OPS_GET_SK: different-register, is_fullsock == 0 path. */
+int diff_reg_bug_detected;
+int diff_reg_null_seen;
+
+SEC("sockops")
+__naked void sock_ops_get_sk_diff_reg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r7 = r1;"
+ "r6 = *(u32 *)(r7 + %[is_fullsock_off]);"
+ "r2 = *(u64 *)(r7 + %[sk_off]);"
+ "if r6 != 0 goto 2f;"
+ "if r2 == 0 goto 1f;"
+ "r1 = %[diff_reg_bug_detected] ll;"
+ "r3 = 1;"
+ "*(u32 *)(r1 + 0) = r3;"
+ "goto 2f;"
+ "1:"
+ "r1 = %[diff_reg_null_seen] ll;"
+ "r3 = 1;"
+ "*(u32 *)(r1 + 0) = r3;"
+ "2:"
+ "r0 = 1;"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm_const(is_fullsock_off, offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops, is_fullsock)),
+ __imm_const(sk_off, offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops, sk)),
+ __imm_addr(diff_reg_bug_detected),
+ __imm_addr(diff_reg_null_seen)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-07 2:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-07 2:26 [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: Fix SOCK_OPS_GET_SK same-register OOB read in sock_ops and add selftest Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-07 2:26 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] bpf: Fix same-register dst/src OOB read and pointer leak in sock_ops Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-07 11:46 ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-07 2:26 ` Jiayuan Chen [this message]
2026-04-08 20:32 ` [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: Fix SOCK_OPS_GET_SK same-register OOB read in sock_ops and add selftest Martin KaFai Lau
2026-04-12 19:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260407022720.162151-3-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--to=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=werner@verivus.ai \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.