From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E205E26158B; Wed, 8 Apr 2026 01:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775613195; cv=none; b=Jy6l74oNsakRpM3H425d6yXjCntwWN1AgGQd/EVCcDJcQtwNV9AifpZbIPKx9anG9n7cMXrnc642EeCuOBQ13lNvWleZIgBP7MS8MfLnzg64RimYw90nurthNjBHMQ1S8a4m+Wx+UJfy4oO/RY3gMJxbR7WJo72BvEjHWPiUQio= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775613195; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oot1CW3zYRijoApmfAfQNt+TN7eXzXttwWjkQW8Dj+Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=Iu9kHWH0V3wXt5KFoCJMlQ0gCnO3X3VZLs32XfLPffnbjYXkhcBiGz88cs1x00++63FMwcnW/6KtxWirP9SMLA70DZ3kiCr9PuJGJ7K+4knFrRKcJmaQjWcTXTf5q/iMHvpSvVklMEsPMXE8qzwO3Sfv/JaPyPNhjb8phk3+NRA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=DBcuVhjV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="DBcuVhjV" Received: from pps.filterd (m0353729.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.11/8.18.1.11) with ESMTP id 637E2T4H2318761; Wed, 8 Apr 2026 01:52:53 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:date:from:message-id:mime-version :subject:to; s=pp1; bh=g6rj0ALg0UDdA6CH9K1KA8uNXSHO7JVCsZ60bnU6T Ls=; b=DBcuVhjVQiucartfFEhvrV/7K6GhneHZMIpm/sFwhx+sLlFIu39ZyWCoa JnC4G8gIdUv2L7GhI2vXRfnwJu0Wr21vC5P8c6ZoHI9kvyndWeIyrrfn+igLZoyp 5BBJW5GTXVdLyxWYFFNUjxZNgkoL6JHpHFzAMaBIvj9EaW0KAaNwQIl1Uf3uCR9a DBgGDDZuv+N5wMH9ll94Yu6pTwU/jQSkA7Cgvw+aYoVrolMQDh+4IOkySKKmbE9p O4VwrXRKDoucAjlUKUk5Hqm49tJuetDBb7aIk5+Qmue4b6cq2JmuujXdMd6mlYNd vTg26xjJSk+9sD9FkGkPTXmshRYxQ== Received: from ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5d.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.93]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4dcn2fwv1n-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 08 Apr 2026 01:52:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 63804vvj013827; Wed, 8 Apr 2026 01:52:51 GMT Received: from smtprelay02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.226]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4dcmf45mw1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 08 Apr 2026 01:52:51 +0000 Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.102]) by smtprelay02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 6381qlbC50594170 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 8 Apr 2026 01:52:47 GMT Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC1F20043; Wed, 8 Apr 2026 01:52:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7395D20040; Wed, 8 Apr 2026 01:52:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ltcrain4-lp15.ltc.tadn.ibm.com (unknown [9.5.7.39]) by smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 8 Apr 2026 01:52:45 +0000 (GMT) From: adubey@linux.ibm.com To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: hbathini@linux.ibm.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Abhishek Dubey , kernel test robot Subject: [PATCH] powerpc32/bpf: fix loading fsession func metadata using PPC_LI32 Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 01:53:01 -0400 Message-ID: <20260408055301.232745-1-adubey@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.52.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=FKArAeos c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=69d5b4f4 cx=c_pps a=3Bg1Hr4SwmMryq2xdFQyZA==:117 a=3Bg1Hr4SwmMryq2xdFQyZA==:17 a=A5OVakUREuEA:10 a=VkNPw1HP01LnGYTKEx00:22 a=RnoormkPH1_aCDwRdu11:22 a=uAbxVGIbfxUO_5tXvNgY:22 a=VwQbUJbxAAAA:8 a=QyXUC8HyAAAA:8 a=VnNF1IyMAAAA:8 a=6s7t5AJM6jSuhkjG0HUA:9 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: OiNXJKwsFEvqySt0UQE1_8rzYoeh0oOf X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjYwNDA4MDAxNCBTYWx0ZWRfX3fbnrFmako0t UyNKPX+solfhugp8ZoDS2xUWb8ZxkZRDb2YMrVg4Wz96sKT+YIfG58Pv7w6RbzvCpD5HJ2ZQbzN bNTlxoLu9qF24BLJSDujtM+/SftRr3y3gufK0Rx8q5OMCvmmUqVCcE/jCjN3ofP4bmnEB9nDx+d KI65UhEljcYpFjBZ7OrRcFysrDbH/DtQIHWOaSPV3+uFtSvx/vWRf1s6rJZasLr87RsUGMOZYrE IMK3s7QzA7zMt1t2SI0GOIQl8vX9fBofKRnpxZFEkrU7+4Y9Ja2PQRdHgtQxjiC8RdgcdvnIFFs nkJiXnWn4kCdVEv/Ggsu9/TWITJ2/R1MG+q5XwjstA9rwTRzICmulpUDrz5Bc5dksiTHYqoXUs/ zV6UcHDA7+Okg06smAbNTrfpPI1ly/B3XVsE0eUiNPXKz2Hk2Cg6GC/TQaukG49g6+Cf9sxQPbj EHkETcZGCDHXkgi2Eng== X-Proofpoint-GUID: OiNXJKwsFEvqySt0UQE1_8rzYoeh0oOf X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1143,Hydra:6.1.51,FMLib:17.12.100.49 definitions=2026-04-08_01,2026-04-07_05,2025-10-01_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.22.0-2604010000 definitions=main-2604080014 From: Abhishek Dubey PPC_RAW_LI32 is not a valid macro in the PowerPC BPF JIT. Use PPC_LI32, which correctly handles immediate loads for large values. Fixes the build error introduced when adding fsession support on ppc32. Reported-by: kernel test robot Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202604040212.jIxEd2DW-lkp@intel.com/ Fixes: 92258b5bf1ec ("powerpc32/bpf: Add fsession support") Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dubey --- Need to apply on tp of powerpc -next, as this fixes a build error reported on that branch arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index f3ae89e1d1d0..bfdc50740da8 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -150,11 +150,11 @@ void store_func_meta(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, * func_meta := argument count in first byte + cookie value */ /* Store lower word */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI32(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG), (u32)func_meta)); + PPC_LI32(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG), (u32)func_meta); EMIT(PPC_RAW_STW(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG), _R1, func_meta_off)); /* Store upper word */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI32(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG), (u32)(func_meta >> 32))); + PPC_LI32(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG), (u32)(func_meta >> 32)); EMIT(PPC_RAW_STW(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG), _R1, func_meta_off + 4)); } -- 2.52.0