All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, kernel-team@fb.com,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
	Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/13] bpf: share several utility functions as internal API
Date: Thu,  9 Apr 2026 18:11:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260409-patch-set-v2-1-651804512349@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260409-patch-set-v2-0-651804512349@gmail.com>

Namely:
- bpf_subprog_is_global
- bpf_vlog_alignment

Acked-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |  2 ++
 kernel/bpf/log.c             |  4 ++--
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c        | 10 +++++-----
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 36bfd96d4563..15f7f9f35be9 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -1121,12 +1121,14 @@ void print_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const struct bpf_verifie
 			  u32 frameno, bool print_all);
 void print_insn_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate,
 		      u32 frameno);
+u32 bpf_vlog_alignment(u32 pos);
 
 struct bpf_subprog_info *bpf_find_containing_subprog(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int off);
 int bpf_jmp_offset(struct bpf_insn *insn);
 struct bpf_iarray *bpf_insn_successors(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 idx);
 void bpf_fmt_stack_mask(char *buf, ssize_t buf_sz, u64 stack_mask);
 bool bpf_calls_callback(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx);
+bool bpf_subprog_is_global(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog);
 
 int bpf_find_subprog(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int off);
 int bpf_compute_const_regs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/log.c b/kernel/bpf/log.c
index 37d72b052192..f0902ecb7df6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/log.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/log.c
@@ -847,7 +847,7 @@ void print_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const struct bpf_verifie
 		mark_verifier_state_clean(env);
 }
 
-static inline u32 vlog_alignment(u32 pos)
+u32 bpf_vlog_alignment(u32 pos)
 {
 	return round_up(max(pos + BPF_LOG_MIN_ALIGNMENT / 2, BPF_LOG_ALIGNMENT),
 			BPF_LOG_MIN_ALIGNMENT) - pos - 1;
@@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ void print_insn_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const struct bpf_verifier_st
 	if (env->prev_log_pos && env->prev_log_pos == env->log.end_pos) {
 		/* remove new line character */
 		bpf_vlog_reset(&env->log, env->prev_log_pos - 1);
-		verbose(env, "%*c;", vlog_alignment(env->prev_insn_print_pos), ' ');
+		verbose(env, "%*c;", bpf_vlog_alignment(env->prev_insn_print_pos), ' ');
 	} else {
 		verbose(env, "%d:", env->insn_idx);
 	}
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 84699a428077..dd81cfbad680 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static struct btf_record *reg_btf_record(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
 	return rec;
 }
 
-static bool subprog_is_global(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog)
+bool bpf_subprog_is_global(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog)
 {
 	struct bpf_func_info_aux *aux = env->prog->aux->func_info_aux;
 
@@ -4610,7 +4610,7 @@ static int backtrack_insn(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int idx, int subseq_idx,
 			if (subprog < 0)
 				return -EFAULT;
 
-			if (subprog_is_global(env, subprog)) {
+			if (bpf_subprog_is_global(env, subprog)) {
 				/* check that jump history doesn't have any
 				 * extra instructions from subprog; the next
 				 * instruction after call to global subprog
@@ -6971,7 +6971,7 @@ static int check_max_stack_depth_subprog(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int idx,
 		if (subprog[idx].has_tail_call)
 			tail_call_reachable = true;
 
-		frame = subprog_is_global(env, idx) ? 0 : frame + 1;
+		frame = bpf_subprog_is_global(env, idx) ? 0 : frame + 1;
 		if (frame >= MAX_CALL_FRAMES) {
 			verbose(env, "the call stack of %d frames is too deep !\n",
 				frame);
@@ -11040,7 +11040,7 @@ static int check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 	err = btf_check_subprog_call(env, subprog, caller->regs);
 	if (err == -EFAULT)
 		return err;
-	if (subprog_is_global(env, subprog)) {
+	if (bpf_subprog_is_global(env, subprog)) {
 		const char *sub_name = subprog_name(env, subprog);
 
 		if (env->cur_state->active_locks) {
@@ -25186,7 +25186,7 @@ static int do_check_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 again:
 	new_cnt = 0;
 	for (i = 1; i < env->subprog_cnt; i++) {
-		if (!subprog_is_global(env, i))
+		if (!bpf_subprog_is_global(env, i))
 			continue;
 
 		sub_aux = subprog_aux(env, i);

-- 
2.53.0

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-10  1:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-10  1:11 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/13] bpf: static stack liveness data flow analysis Eduard Zingerman
2026-04-10  1:11 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2026-04-10  1:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/13] bpf: save subprogram name in bpf_subprog_info Eduard Zingerman
2026-04-10  1:50   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-10  4:04     ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-04-10  1:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/13] bpf: Add spis_*() helpers for 4-byte stack slot bitmasks Eduard Zingerman
2026-04-10  1:50   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-10  4:05     ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-04-10  1:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/13] bpf: make liveness.c track stack with 4-byte granularity Eduard Zingerman
2026-04-10  1:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/13] bpf: 4-byte precise clean_verifier_state Eduard Zingerman
2026-04-10  1:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/13] bpf: prepare bpf_liveness api for use by static analysis pass Eduard Zingerman
2026-04-10  1:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/13] bpf: introduce forward arg-tracking dataflow analysis Eduard Zingerman
2026-04-10  2:02   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-10  1:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/13] bpf: simplify liveness to use (callsite, depth) keyed func_instances Eduard Zingerman
2026-04-10  2:02   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-10  1:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/13] bpf: change logging scheme for live stack analysis Eduard Zingerman
2026-04-10  2:02   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-10  4:06     ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-04-10  1:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/13] selftests/bpf: update existing tests due to liveness changes Eduard Zingerman
2026-04-10  1:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/13] selftests/bpf: adjust verifier_log buffers Eduard Zingerman
2026-04-10  1:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/13] selftests/bpf: add new tests for static stack liveness analysis Eduard Zingerman
2026-04-10  1:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 13/13] bpf: poison dead stack slots Eduard Zingerman
2026-04-10  2:02   ` bot+bpf-ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260409-patch-set-v2-1-651804512349@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=yatsenko@meta.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.