From: Cao Ruichuang <create0818@163.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Cao Ruichuang <create0818@163.com>,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
shuah@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/ftrace: Account for fprobe attachment at creation
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 12:32:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260410043243.65800-1-create0818@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260409172955.98e2d20a7f7736a1a9834816@kernel.org>
Hi Masami,
I reran this in clean QEMU on two kernels and got different results.
1. Ubuntu distro kernel:
Linux 6.8.0-100-generic #100-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
Tue Jan 13 16:40:06 UTC 2026
baseline count=2
after_create123 count=4
after_enable1/2/3 count=4
baseline enabled_functions:
__hid_bpf_tail_call ...
after_create123 enabled_functions:
kernel_clone (2) R ->arch_ftrace_ops_list_func+0x0/0x280
kmem_cache_free (1) R tramp: ... ->fprobe_handler+0x0/0x40
__hid_bpf_tail_call ...
2. Current source-tree kernel built from the clean snapshot of my patch
branch:
Linux 7.0.0-rc6 #2 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Apr 10 12:19:39 CST 2026
baseline count=0
after_create123 count=0
after_enable1 count=1
after_enable2 count=1
after_enable3 count=2
after_create123 enabled_functions:
<empty>
after_enable3 enabled_functions:
kernel_clone (2) ->arch_ftrace_ops_list_func+0x0/0x200
kmem_cache_free (1) tramp: ... ->fprobe_ftrace_entry+0x0/0x220
So the behavior I reported earlier reproduces on that Ubuntu 6.8 kernel,
but not on the current source-tree kernel. I think my earlier conclusion
was too broad.
I will stop pushing this testcase change for now unless I can narrow down
which kernel change caused the difference.
Thanks,
Cao Ruichuang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-10 4:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-07 11:57 [PATCH] selftests/ftrace: Account for fprobe attachment at creation Cao Ruichuang
2026-04-08 0:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-04-08 4:09 ` Cao Ruichuang
2026-04-09 5:18 ` Cao Ruichuang
2026-04-09 8:29 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-04-10 4:32 ` Cao Ruichuang [this message]
2026-04-13 8:48 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-04-08 4:25 ` [PATCH v2] selftests/ftrace: Account for fprobe attachment before enable Cao Ruichuang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260410043243.65800-1-create0818@163.com \
--to=create0818@163.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.