From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] net: add missing syncookie statistics for BPF custom syncookies
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 09:32:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260411013211.225834-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> (raw)
1. Replace IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF) with CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL for
cookie_bpf_ok() and cookie_bpf_check(). CONFIG_BPF is selected by
CONFIG_NET unconditionally, so IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF) is always
true and provides no real guard. CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL is the correct
config for BPF program functionality.
2. Remove the CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL guard around struct bpf_tcp_req_attrs.
This struct is referenced by bpf_sk_assign_tcp_reqsk() in
net/core/filter.c which is compiled unconditionally, so wrapping
the definition in a config guard could cause build failures when
CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL=n.
3. Fix mismatched declaration of cookie_bpf_check() between the
CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL and stub paths: the real definition takes
'struct net *net' but the declaration in the header did not.
Add the net parameter to the declaration and all call sites.
4. Add missing LINUX_MIB_SYNCOOKIESRECV and LINUX_MIB_SYNCOOKIESFAILED
statistics in cookie_bpf_check(), so that BPF custom syncookie
validation is accounted for in SNMP counters just like the
non-BPF path.
Compile-tested with CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL=y and CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
not set.
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
---
No functional bug here — CONFIG_BPF is always enabled under
CONFIG_NET, so the existing code compiles and works correctly.
This is a cleanup and improvement, no backport needed.
Added a selftest, suggested by Kuniyuki Iwashima.
---
include/net/tcp.h | 7 +++----
net/ipv4/syncookies.c | 10 +++++++---
net/ipv6/syncookies.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
index 6156d1d068e1..570a8836c2ba 100644
--- a/include/net/tcp.h
+++ b/include/net/tcp.h
@@ -598,7 +598,6 @@ struct request_sock *cookie_tcp_reqsk_alloc(const struct request_sock_ops *ops,
struct tcp_options_received *tcp_opt,
int mss, u32 tsoff);
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF)
struct bpf_tcp_req_attrs {
u32 rcv_tsval;
u32 rcv_tsecr;
@@ -612,7 +611,6 @@ struct bpf_tcp_req_attrs {
u8 usec_ts_ok;
u8 reserved[3];
};
-#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SYN_COOKIES
@@ -715,13 +713,14 @@ static inline bool cookie_ecn_ok(const struct net *net, const struct dst_entry *
dst_feature(dst, RTAX_FEATURE_ECN);
}
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF)
+#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
static inline bool cookie_bpf_ok(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
return skb->sk;
}
-struct request_sock *cookie_bpf_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
+struct request_sock *cookie_bpf_check(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
+ struct sk_buff *skb);
#else
static inline bool cookie_bpf_ok(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
diff --git a/net/ipv4/syncookies.c b/net/ipv4/syncookies.c
index f1474598d2c8..d685631438cb 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/syncookies.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/syncookies.c
@@ -295,8 +295,9 @@ static int cookie_tcp_reqsk_init(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
return 0;
}
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF)
-struct request_sock *cookie_bpf_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
+#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
+struct request_sock *cookie_bpf_check(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
+ struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct request_sock *req = inet_reqsk(skb->sk);
@@ -306,6 +307,9 @@ struct request_sock *cookie_bpf_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (cookie_tcp_reqsk_init(sk, skb, req)) {
reqsk_free(req);
req = NULL;
+ __NET_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_SYNCOOKIESFAILED);
+ } else {
+ __NET_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_SYNCOOKIESRECV);
}
return req;
@@ -419,7 +423,7 @@ struct sock *cookie_v4_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
goto out;
if (cookie_bpf_ok(skb)) {
- req = cookie_bpf_check(sk, skb);
+ req = cookie_bpf_check(net, sk, skb);
} else {
req = cookie_tcp_check(net, sk, skb);
if (IS_ERR(req))
diff --git a/net/ipv6/syncookies.c b/net/ipv6/syncookies.c
index 4f6f0d751d6c..111d7a41d957 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/syncookies.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/syncookies.c
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ struct sock *cookie_v6_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
goto out;
if (cookie_bpf_ok(skb)) {
- req = cookie_bpf_check(sk, skb);
+ req = cookie_bpf_check(net, sk, skb);
} else {
req = cookie_tcp_check(net, sk, skb);
if (IS_ERR(req))
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-04-11 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-11 1:32 Jiayuan Chen [this message]
2026-04-11 1:32 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: verify syncookie statistics in tcp_custom_syncookie Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-14 5:50 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-04-14 9:08 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-04-14 9:17 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-04-14 20:02 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-04-15 2:22 ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-14 5:38 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] net: add missing syncookie statistics for BPF custom syncookies Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-04-14 19:51 ` Martin KaFai Lau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260411013211.225834-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--to=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.