From: luka.gejak@linux.dev
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, fmaurer@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v6 2/2] net: hsr: reject unresolved interlink ifindex
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:34:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260413103449.169913-3-luka.gejak@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260413103449.169913-1-luka.gejak@linux.dev>
From: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
In hsr_newlink(), a provided but invalid IFLA_HSR_INTERLINK attribute
was silently ignored if __dev_get_by_index() returned NULL. This leads
to incorrect RedBox topology creation without notifying the user.
Fix this by returning -EINVAL and an extack message when the
interlink attribute is present but cannot be resolved.
Assisted-by: Gemini:Gemini-3.1-flash
Reviewed-by: Felix Maurer <fmaurer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
---
net/hsr/hsr_netlink.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_netlink.c b/net/hsr/hsr_netlink.c
index db0b0af7a692..f0ca23da3ab9 100644
--- a/net/hsr/hsr_netlink.c
+++ b/net/hsr/hsr_netlink.c
@@ -76,9 +76,14 @@ static int hsr_newlink(struct net_device *dev,
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (data[IFLA_HSR_INTERLINK])
+ if (data[IFLA_HSR_INTERLINK]) {
interlink = __dev_get_by_index(link_net,
nla_get_u32(data[IFLA_HSR_INTERLINK]));
+ if (!interlink) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Interlink does not exist");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
if (interlink && interlink == link[0]) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Interlink and Slave1 are the same");
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-13 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-13 10:34 [PATCH net-next v6 0/2] net: hsr: strict supervision TLV validation luka.gejak
2026-04-13 10:34 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/2] net: hsr: require valid EOT supervision TLV luka.gejak
2026-04-13 10:57 ` Felix Maurer
2026-04-13 10:34 ` luka.gejak [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-05-13 18:26 [PATCH net-next v6 0/2] net: hsr: strict supervision TLV validation luka.gejak
2026-05-13 18:26 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/2] net: hsr: reject unresolved interlink ifindex luka.gejak
2026-05-14 12:55 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260413103449.169913-3-luka.gejak@linux.dev \
--to=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fmaurer@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.