[PATCH 6.12 26/70] Revert "mptcp: add needs_id for netlink appending addr"

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

6.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 8e2760eaab778494fc1fa257031e0e1799647f46 ]

This commit was originally adding the ability to add MPTCP endpoints
with ID 0 by accident. The in-kernel PM, handling MPTCP endpoints at the
net namespace level, is not supposed to handle endpoints with such ID,
because this ID 0 is reserved to the initial subflow, as mentioned in
the MPTCPv1 protocol [1], a per-connection setting.

Note that 'ip mptcp endpoint add id 0' stops early with an error, but
other tools might still request the in-kernel PM to create MPTCP
endpoints with this restricted ID 0.

In other words, it was wrong to call the mptcp_pm_has_addr_attr_id
helper to check whether the address ID attribute is set: if it was set
to 0, a new MPTCP endpoint would be created with ID 0, which is not
expected, and might cause various issues later.

Fixes: 584f38942626 ("mptcp: add needs_id for netlink appending addr")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8684#section-3.2-9 [1]
Reviewed-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260407-net-mptcp-revert-pm-needs-id-v2-1-7a25cbc324f8@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
[ applied changes to net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c instead of renamed net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c ]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c |   24 +++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@ static void __mptcp_pm_release_addr_entr
 
 static int mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet,
 					     struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry,
-					     bool needs_id, bool replace)
+					     bool replace)
 {
 	struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *cur, *del_entry = NULL;
 	unsigned int addr_max;
@@ -1135,7 +1135,7 @@ static int mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (!entry->addr.id && needs_id) {
+	if (!entry->addr.id) {
 find_next:
 		entry->addr.id = find_next_zero_bit(pernet->id_bitmap,
 						    MPTCP_PM_MAX_ADDR_ID + 1,
@@ -1146,7 +1146,7 @@ find_next:
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (!entry->addr.id && needs_id)
+	if (!entry->addr.id)
 		goto out;
 
 	__set_bit(entry->addr.id, pernet->id_bitmap);
@@ -1279,7 +1279,7 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id(struct mptc
 	entry->ifindex = 0;
 	entry->flags = MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_IMPLICIT;
 	entry->lsk = NULL;
-	ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry, true, false);
+	ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry, false);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		kfree(entry);
 
@@ -1498,18 +1498,6 @@ next:
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static bool mptcp_pm_has_addr_attr_id(const struct nlattr *attr,
-				      struct genl_info *info)
-{
-	struct nlattr *tb[MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_MAX + 1];
-
-	if (!nla_parse_nested_deprecated(tb, MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_MAX, attr,
-					 mptcp_pm_address_nl_policy, info->extack) &&
-	    tb[MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_ID])
-		return true;
-	return false;
-}
-
 int mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 {
 	struct nlattr *attr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ENDPOINT_ADDR];
@@ -1551,9 +1539,7 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_doit(struct sk_
 			goto out_free;
 		}
 	}
-	ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry,
-						!mptcp_pm_has_addr_attr_id(attr, info),
-						true);
+	ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry, true);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		GENL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(info, "too many addresses or duplicate one: %d", ret);
 		goto out_free;